Anterior|Siguiente

Hyperspectral anomaly change detection model based on independent component analysis

  • role： First author第一作者
  • Affiliation：

    Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

  • Email：linyk@radi.ac.cn
  • Introduction：林昱坤，1991年生，女，博士研究生，研究方向为时空谱变化检测方法及应用。E-mail：linyk@radi.ac.cn
LIN Yukun12,  
  • Affiliation：

    Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

WANG Nan1,  
  • role： Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation：

    Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, China

    Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

  • Email：zhanglf@radi.ac.cn
  • Introduction：张立福，1967年生，男，研究员，研究方向为高光谱遥感机理及典型应用。E-mail：zhanglf@radi.ac.cn
ZHANG Lifu31*,  
  • Affiliation：

    Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

CEN Yi1,  
  • Affiliation：

    Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

SUN Xuejian1,  
  • Affiliation：

    Guizhou Jingyuan Science and Technology Co., Ltd, Guiyang 550081, China

LU Hanyu4,  
  • Affiliation：

    Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

TONG Qingxi1

resumen

Small target signals detected through remote sensing are typically weak signals. The traditional hyperspectral anomaly change detection method directly suppresses the background. However, it frequently causes small targets to be suppressed simultaneously, thereby resulting in a low target detection rate and a high false alarm rate. In this study, a hyperspectral anomaly change detection model based on independent component analysis is used. The proposed model is projected on an independent component, which first highlights the anomaly changes and then suppresses the background to achieve the effective separation of anomaly changes and background. This model can effectively reduce the false alarm rate and improve the detection rate. The accuracy is verified by simulation and real data. Results show that the detection accuracy is 99% using simulated data, and the detection accuracy is 86% using real data. The accuracy is increased by 9% in comparison with the traditional anomaly change detection algorithm. The proposed hyperspectral anomaly change detection method is suitable for processing weak targets. Remote sensing image change detection is the process of quantitatively analyzing the surface changes in remote sensing images that are not obtained in the same surface area simultaneously. However, change detection frequently fails to highlight the change in interest given the differences in atmospheric environment and radiation difference caused by various sensors. We aim to find the small changes that are rare and different from the overall background trend. Traditional hyperspectral anomaly detection methods are generally used to highlight abnormal changes by directly suppressing the background. However, the three methods mentioned above cannot effectively eliminate the radiation differences in the case of complex objects and cannot guarantee the consistency of the background. The background is difficult to suppress, and the anomaly changes cannot be highlighted. Abnormal change detection method based on Independent Component Analysis (ICA) through the abnormal changes in RX anomaly detection method of pixels selects the anomalies with strong changes in abnormal pixels for initial projection direction and to all pixels to initialize the orthogonal projection of projection direction and abnormal pixel labeling for a second projection direction until the number of iterations to achieve independent component. The visual discrimination results after joining LCRA anomaly change detection results effectively restrain the false alarm rates and highlight the anomaly change targets, and abnormal change detection obtains accurate results. The ICA results show that the accuracy of anomaly change detection is superior to other methods. The result shows the quantitative evaluation result of abnormal change detection. ICA realizes the highest accuracy. The ICA anomaly change detection method achieves a low false alarm rate and favorable detection effect, and this method can obtain the highest accuracy with or without the LCRA matching strategy. Considering the evident geometric matching error of real data, the accuracies of all methods improve by approximately 0.2 after the LCRA matching strategy is adopted. The result shows the corresponding accuracy of the ICA anomaly detection method for analyzing the number of different independent components. Moreover, the result accuracy of this method is the highest when the number of independent components is moderate and between 7 and 14, thereby reflecting its robustness. The accuracy of the proposed method is better than other methods when the parameter size is reasonable. This study presents an ICA model, which determines the abnormal changes in projection on an independent component and the prominent changes in the target and restrains the background to achieve the effective separation of target and background, effectively improve the detection rate, and achieve low false alarm rates. The conclusions are summarized as follows: (1)The proposed method that uses simulated data achieves abnormal change detection accuracy of 99% and real data detection accuracy of 86% in comparison with the traditional abnormal change detection algorithm, which accuracy reaches 9%; (2) Aiming at the abnormal change target of a subpixel level, the proposed method has a 1% improvement in accuracy in comparison with traditional abnormal change detection. (3) The proposed method has only one parameter, and the selection of parameters slightly impact accuracy, which has strong robustness.

palabra clave

independent component analysis;anomaly change detection;projection pursuit;subpixel;remote sensing;hyperspectral

References

  1. 1.
    Acito N, Diani M, Rossi A and de Ceglie S U. 2014. Hyperspectral anomalous change detection in the presence of non-stationary atmospheric/illumination conditions//Proceedings of SPIE 9244, Image and Signal Processing for Remote Sensing XX. Amsterdam, Netherlands: SPIE [DOI: 10.1117/12.2067314]
  2. 2.
    Eismann M T, Meola J and Hardie R C. 2008. Hyperspectral change detection in the presenceof diurnal and seasonal variations. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 46(1): 237–249
  3. 3.
    Jin H and Ling C X. 2005. Using AUC and accuracy in evaluating learning algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 17(3): 299–310
  4. 4.
    Matteoli S, Diani M and Corsini G. 2010. A tutorial overview of anomaly detection in hyperspectral images. IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, 25(7): 5–28
  5. 5.
    Peng B, Zhang L F, Zhang P, Peng X M and Cen Y. 2017. Real-time sample-wise hyperspectral anomaly detection algorithm using Cholesky decomposition. Journal of Remote Sensing, 21(5): 739–748
  6. 6.
    Pieper M, Manolakis D, Cooley T, Brueggeman M, Weisner A and Jacobson J. 2015a. New insights and practical considerations in hyperspectral change detection//Proceedings of 2015 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS). Milan, Italy: IEEE: 4161-4164 [DOI: 10.1109/IGARSS.2015.7326742]
  7. 7.
    Pieper M, Manolakis D, Truslow E, Cooley T, Brueggeman M, Weisner A and Jacobson J. 2015b. Comparison of hyperspectral change detection algorithms//Proceedings of SPIE 9611, Imaging Spectrometry XX. San Diego, California, United States: SPIE [DOI: 10.1117/12.2188316]
  8. 8.
    Reed I S and Yu X. 1990. Adaptive multiple-band CFAR detection of an optical pattern with unknown spectral distribution. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 38(10): 1760–1770
  9. 9.
    Rossi A, Acito N, Diani M, Corsini G, De Ceglie S U, Riccobono A and Chiarantini L. 2014. Hyperspectral data collection for the assessment of target detection algorithms: the Viareggio 2013 trial//Proceedings of SPIE 9250, Electro-Optical Remote Sensing, Photonic Technologies, and Applications VIII; and Military Applications in Hyperspectral Imaging and High Spatial Resolution Sensing II. Amsterdam, Netherlands: SPIE [DOI: 10.1117/12.2067313]
  10. 10.
    Rotman S and Shalev H. 2017. Evaluating hyperspectral imaging change detection methods//Proceedings of 2017 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS). Fort Worth, TX, USA: IEEE: 1946-1949 [DOI: 10.1109/IGARSS.2017.8127360]
  11. 11.
    Schweizer S M and Moura J M F. 2000. Hyperspectral imagery: clutter adaptation in anomaly detection. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 46(5): 1855–1871
  12. 12.
    Singh A. 1989. Review article digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 10(6): 989–1003
  13. 13.
    Theiler J. 2008a. Quantitative comparison of quadratic covariance-based anomalous change detectors. Applied Optics, 47(28): F12–F26
  14. 14.
    Theiler J. 2008b. Subpixel anomalous change detection in remote sensing imagery//Proceedings of 2008 IEEE Southwest Symposium on Image Analysis and Interpretation. Santa Fe, NM, USA: IEEE: 165-168 [DOI: 10.1109/SSIAI.2008.4512311]
  15. 15.
    Theiler J and Matsekh A M. 2010. Total least squares for anomalous change detection//Proceedings of SPIE 7695, Algorithms and Technologies for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery XVI. Orlando, Florida, United States: SPIE [DOI: 10.1117/12.851935]
  16. 16.
    Theiler J and Perkins S. 2006. Proposed framework for anomalous change detection//Workshop on Machine Learning Algorithms for Surveillance and Event Detection at the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning. Los Alamos, NM: Los Alamos National Laboratory
  17. 17.
    Theiler J and Wohlberg B. 2012. Local coregistration adjustment for anomalous change detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50(8): 3107–3116
  18. 18.
    Tong Q X, Zhang B and Zhang L F. 2016. Current progress of hyperspectral remote sensing in China. Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(5): 689–707
  19. 19.
    Vongsy K, Karimkhan S, Shaw A K and Wicker D. 2007. Change detection for hyperspectral imagery//Proceedings of SPIE 6565, Algorithms and Technologies for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery XIII. Orlando, Florida, United States: SPIE [DOI: 10.1117/12.723161]
  20. 20.
    Vongsy K, Mendenhall M J, Hanna P M and Kaufman J. 2009. Change detection using synthetic hyperspectral imagery//Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing. Grenoble, France: IEEE: 1-6 [DOI: 10.1109/WHISPERS.2009.5289016]
  21. 21.
    Wang B, Choi S K, Han Y K, Lee S K and Choi J W. 2015. Application of IR-MAD using synthetically fused images for change detection in hyperspectral data. Remote Sensing Letters, 6(8): 578–586
  22. 22.
    Wang T, Du B and Zhang L P. 2013. A kernel-based target-constrained interference-minimized filter for hyperspectral sub-pixel target detection. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 6(2): 626–637
  23. 23.
    Wohlberg B and Theiler J. 2010. Symmetrized local co-registration optimization for anomalous change detection//Proceedings of SPIE 7533, Computational Imaging VIII. San Jose, California, United States: SPIE: 753307 [DOI: 10.1117/12.845210]

Leer el texto completo

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website