Anterior|Siguiente

Extraction of marsh wetland in Heilongjiang Basin based on GEE and multi-source remote sensing data

  • role： First author第一作者
  • Affiliation：

    Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Chinese Academy of Surveying and Mapping, Beijing 100036, China

    College of Geomatics,Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China

  • Email：ningxg@casm.ac.cn
  • Introduction：宁晓刚，1979年生， 男， 研究员，研究方向为地理国情和自然资源遥感监测。 E-mail： ningxg@casm.ac.cn
NING Xiaogang12,  
  • Affiliation：

    Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Chinese Academy of Surveying and Mapping, Beijing 100036, China

    College of Geomatics,Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China

CHANG Wentao12,  
  • role： Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation：

    Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Chinese Academy of Surveying and Mapping, Beijing 100036, China

    College of Geomatics,Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China

  • Email：wanghao@casm.ac.cn
  • Introduction：王浩，1985 年生，男，副研究员，研究方向为生态遥感监测与土地利用变化分析。E-mail： wanghao@casm.ac.cn
WANG Hao12*,  
  • Affiliation：

    Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Chinese Academy of Surveying and Mapping, Beijing 100036, China

ZHANG Hanchao1,  
  • Affiliation：

    State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210029, China

ZHU Qiande3

resumen

Wetland is an important ecosystem on the planet and plays a pivotal role in maintaining global ecological environment security. Traditional wetland monitoring requires a lot of manpower and financial resources due to the unique hydrological characteristics of wetlands, and extracting large-scale wetland information is also difficult. Compared with traditional field surveys, remote sensing technology, which has the advantages of wide observation range, short update cycle, has played an important role in large-scale wetland information extraction. However, remote sensing monitoring of march wetland mainly uses optical images traditionally, which are severely affected by weather such as clouds and rain, making large-scale marsh wetland extraction challenging. The use of radar and terrain data can combine the spectral information and scattering mechanism, which has great potential for marsh wetland information extraction. Nevertheless, there are few studies that evaluate the differences of optical, SAR, and topographic features in importance for the extraction of marsh wetland information. The rise of big data and cloud computing has enabled large-scale and long time series spatial data processing. On the basis of the Google Earth Engine (GEE) cloud platform, this study uses Sentinel-1 synthetic aperture radar data, Sentinel-2 optical data, and terrain data to explore their importance to the extraction of marsh wetland at large scale, and verify the feasibility of JM distance to find the optimal feature combination to the extraction of marsh wetland. Random forest algorithm is also used to extract marsh wetlands in Heilongjiang Basin in 2018. In order to explore the importance of red edge, radar and topographic features and the best features conducive to marsh wetland extraction, six experimental schemes are designed. Scheme one uses the combination of spectral feature, vegetation index and water index. Scheme two uses the combination of spectral feature and red edge feature. Scheme three uses the combination of spectral feature and terrain feature. Scheme four uses the combination of spectral feature and radar feature. Scheme five uses the combination of spectral feature, vegetation index, water index, red edge feature, terrain feature and radar feature. Scheme six uses all features, which are optimized by JM distance. The research shows that (1) Sentinel-2 red edge bands and Sentinel-1 radar bands and terrain data are conducive to marsh wetland information extraction. Compared with vegetation indexes and water indexes, the producer accuracy of marsh increased by 7.56%, 5.04%, and 4.48%. (2) The separation obtained using JM distance shows that the order is red-edge features > other optical features > terrain features > radar features. The marsh wetland in scheme six has the highest mapping accuracy and user accuracy. After using the JM distance to select features, the producer and user accuracies of the marsh wetland increased by 1.45% and 3.02%, respectively. The overall accuracy of the combined random forest algorithm was 91.54%, and the accuracy of marsh extraction was 88%. This study uses the GEE cloud platform, multisource remote sensing data, and machine learning algorithms to accurately, quickly, and efficiently extract large-scale marsh wetland information. This method has great application potential.

palabra clave

remote sensing;Google Earth Engine;marsh;Sentinel-1;Sentinel-2;JM distance;Random Forest;red-edge bands

References

  1. 1.
    Amani M, Brisco B, Afshar M, Mirmazloumi S M, Mahdavi S, Mirzadeh S M J, Huang W M and Granger J. 2019. A generalized supervised classification scheme to produce provincial wetland inventory maps: an application of Google Earth Engine for big geo data processing. Big Earth Data, 3(4): 378-394
  2. 2.
    Belgiu M and Drăguţ L. 2016. Random forest in remote sensing: a review of applications and future directions. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 114: 24-31
  3. 3.
    Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1): 5-32
  4. 4.
    Chang W T, Wang H, Ning X G and Zhang H C. 2020. Extraction of Zhalong wetlands information based on images of sentinel-2 red-edge bands and sentinel-1 radar bands. Wetland Science, 18(1): 10-19
  5. 5.
    Chatziantoniou A, Psomiadis E and Petropoulos G P. 2017. Co-Orbital Sentinel 1 and 2 for LULC mapping with emphasis on wetlands in a mediterranean setting based on machine learning. Remote Sensing, 9(12): 1259
  6. 6.
    Congalton R G. 1991. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 37(1): 35-46
  7. 7.
    Cui M H. 2006. Status quo of wetlands of Heilongjiang River valley and the protection. Forest Inventory and Planning, 31(1): 75-78
  8. 8.
    Dubeau P, King D J, Unbushe D G and Rebelo L M. 2017. Mapping the Dabus wetlands, Ethiopia, using random forest classification of Landsat, PALSAR and topographic data. Remote Sensing, 9(10): 1056
  9. 9.
    Fang L, Wang W J, Jiang W G, Chen M, Wang Y, Jia K and Li Y S. 2017. Spatio-temporal variations of vegetation cover and its responses to climate change in the Heilongjiang Basin of China from 2000 to 2014. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 37(11): 1745-1754
  10. 10.
    Gorelick N, Hancher M, Dixon M, Ilyushchenko S, Thau D and Moore R. 2017. Google earth engine: planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sensing of Environment, 202: 18-27
  11. 11.
    He Y, Huang C, Li H, Liu Q S, Liu G H, Zhou Z C and Zhang C C. 2019. Land-cover classification of random forest based on Sentinel-2A image feature optimization. Resources Science, 41(5): 992-1001
  12. 12.
    Hird J N, DeLancey E R, McDermid G J and Kariyeva J. 2017. Google Earth Engine, open-access satellite data, and machine learning in support of large-area probabilistic wetland mapping. Remote Sensing, 9(12): 1315
  13. 13.
    Limpitlaw D and Gens R. 2006. Dambo mapping for environmental monitoring using Landsat TM and SAR imagery: case study in the Zambian Copperbelt. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27(21): 4839-4845
  14. 14.
    Lin C S, Wu C C, Tsogt K, Ouyang Y C and Chang C I. 2015. Effects of atmospheric correction and pansharpening on LULC classification accuracy using WorldView-2 imagery. Information Processing in Agriculture, 2(1): 25-36
  15. 15.
    Liu L, Zang S Y, Na X D and Pei X Y. 2013. Wetland mapping in the Zhalong natural reserve using optical and radar remotely sensed data and ancillary topographical data. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 29(1): 36-40
  16. 16.
    Mahdianpari M, Salehi B, Mohammadimanesh F, Homayouni S and Gill E. 2019. The first wetland inventory map of newfoundland at a spatial resolution of 10 m using sentinel-1 and sentinel-2 data on the Google earth engine cloud computing platform. Remote Sensing, 11(1): 43
  17. 17.
    Meng M, Tian H F, Wu M Q, Wang L and Niu Y. 2019. Evolution characteristics analysis of wetland landscape pattern based on Google Earth Engine platform: a case study on Baiyangdian. Journal of Yunnan University (Natural Science Edition), 41(2): 416-424
  18. 18.
    Mitsch W J, Bernal B, Nahlik A M, Mander Ü, Zhang L, Anderson C J, Jørgensen S E and Brix H. 2013. Wetlands, carbon, and climate change. Landscape Ecology, 28(4): 583-597
  19. 19.
    Mitsch W J and Gosselink J G. 2000. The value of wetlands: importance of scale and landscape setting. Ecological Economics, 35(1): 25-33
  20. 20.
    Ozesmi S L and Bauer M E. 2002. Satellite remote sensing of wetlands. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 10(5): 381-402
  21. 21.
    Rodriguez-Galiano V F, Ghimire B, Rogan J, Chica-Olmo M and Rigol-Sanchez J P. 2012. An assessment of the effectiveness of a random forest classifier for land-cover classification. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 67: 93-104
  22. 22.
    Shalaby A and Tateishi R. 2007. Remote sensing and GIS for mapping and monitoring land cover and land-use changes in the Northwestern coastal zone of Egypt. Applied Geography, 27(1): 28-41
  23. 23.
    Shoko C and Mutanga O. 2017. Examining the strength of the newly-launched Sentinel 2 MSI sensor in detecting and discriminating subtle differences between C3 and C4 grass species. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 129: 32-40
  24. 24.
    Song C H, Woodcock C E, Seto K C, Lenney M P and Macomber S A. 2001. Classification and change detection using Landsat TM data: when and how to correct atmospheric effects?. Remote Sensing of Environment, 75(2): 230-244
  25. 25.
    Teluguntla P, Thenkabail P S, Oliphant A, Xiong J, Gumma M K, Congalton R G, Yadav K and Huete A. 2018. A 30-m landsat-derived cropland extent product of Australia and China using random forest machine learning algorithm on Google Earth Engine cloud computing platform. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 144: 325-340
  26. 26.
    Wang A Q, Zhou D M and Gong H L. 2012. A research on method of wetland vegetation identification and classification based on radar backscatter characteristics. Remote Sensing Information, (2): 15-19
  27. 27.
    Whyte A, Ferentinos K P and Petropoulos G P. 2018. A new synergistic approach for monitoring wetlands using Sentinels -1 and 2 data with object-based machine learning algorithms. Environmental Modelling and Software, 104: 40-54
  28. 28.
    Yan B, Zhang X, Xia Z Q, Guo M C, Liu C X and Luo Y Y. 2019. Characteristics of precipitation variation in Heilongjiang River Basin. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 36(7): 14-17, 22
  29. 29.
    Yan T T, Bian H F, Liao G X, Sheng L X, Zhang J S and Gao M H. 2014. Research status of methods for mapping forested wetlands based on remote sensing. Remote Sensing for Land and Resources, 26(2): 11-18
  30. 30.
    Yesou H, Pottier E, Mercier G, Grizonnet M, Haouet S, Giros A, Faivre R, Huber C and Michel J. 2016. Synergy of Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 imagery for wetland monitoring information extraction from continuous flow of sentinel images applied to water bodies and vegetation mapping and monitoring//2016 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS). Beijing: IEEE: 162-165
  31. 31.
    Zhang M and Zeng Y N. 2015. Mapping paddy fields of Dongting Lake area by fusing Landsat and MODIS data. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 31(13): 178-185
  32. 32.
    Zhang M, Zeng Y N and Zhu Y S. 2017. Wetland mapping of Donting Lake Basin based on time-series MODIS data and object-oriented method. Journal of Remote Sensing, 21(3): 479-492

Leer el texto completo

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website