Anterior|Siguiente

Machine learning paradigms in high-resolution remote sensing image interpretation

  • role： First author第一作者
  • Affiliation：

    Research and Development Institute of Northwestern Polytechnical University in Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518057, China

    School of Automation, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China

  • Email：zhoupeicheng@mail.nwpu.edu.cn
  • Introduction：周培诚, 1988年生, 男, 博士研究生, 研究方向为计算机视觉与模式识别。E-mail: zhoupeicheng@mail.nwpu.edu.cn
ZHOU Peicheng12,  
  • Affiliation：

    Research and Development Institute of Northwestern Polytechnical University in Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518057, China

    School of Automation, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China

CHENG Gong12,  
  • Affiliation：

    Research and Development Institute of Northwestern Polytechnical University in Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518057, China

    School of Automation, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China

YAO Xiwen12,  
  • role： Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation：

    School of Automation, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China

  • Email：jhan@nwpu.edu.cn
  • Introduction：韩军伟, 1977年生, 男, 教授， 研究方向为计算机视觉与模式识别。E-mail: jhan@nwpu.edu.cn
HAN Junwei2*

resumen

High-resolution remote sensing image interpretation is a major topic in remote sensing information processing. It plays a vital role in the knowledge mining and intelligent analysis of remote sensing big data and has important application values in civil and military fields. The traditional methods of high-resolution remote sensing image interpretation generally use manual visual interpretation, which is time consuming and laborious and has low accuracy. Therefore, interpreting high-resolution remote sensing images automatically and efficiently is an urgent problem to be solved. The rapid development of artificial intelligence technology in recent years has made machine learning the mainstream research direction of high-resolution remote sensing image interpretation. In this study, we systematically review five kinds of representative machine learning paradigms on the basis of the typical tasks of high-resolution remote sensing image interpretation, such as object detection, scene classification, semantic segmentation, and hyperspectral image classification. Specifically, we introduce their definitions, typical methods, and applications. The representative machine learning paradigms include supervised learning (e.g., support vector machine, k-nearest neighbor, decision tree, random tree, and probabilistic graph model), semi-supervised learning (e.g., pure semi-supervised learning, transductive learning, and active learning), weakly supervised learning (e.g., multiple instance learning), unsupervised learning (e.g., clustering, principal component analysis, and sparse coding), and deep learning (e.g., stacked auto-encoder, deep belief network, convolutional neural network, and generative adversarial network). Then, we comprehensively analyze the strengths and limitations of the five kinds of machine learning paradigms and summarize their typical applications in remote sensing image interpretation. Finally, we summarize the development direction of high-resolution remote sensing image interpretation, such as few-shot learning, unsupervised deep learning, and reinforcement learning.

palabra clave

remote sensing image interpretation;machine learning paradigm;deep learning;weakly supervised learning;few-shot learning;reinforcement learning

References

  1. 1.
    Arı C and Aksoy S. 2014. Detection of compound structures using a gaussian mixture model with spectral and spatial constraints. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 52(10): 6627-6638
  2. 2.
    Bai X, Zhang H G and Zhou J. 2014. VHR object detection based on structural feature extraction and query expansion. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 52(10): 6508-6520
  3. 3.
    Bandos T V, Bruzzone L and Camps-Valls G. 2009. Classification of hyperspectral images with regularized linear discriminant analysis. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 47(3): 862-873
  4. 4.
    Blaschke T. 2010. Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 65(1): 2-16
  5. 5.
    Boualleg Y, Farah M and Farah I R. 2019. Remote sensing scene classification using convolutional features and deep forest classifier. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 16(12): 1944-1948
  6. 6.
    Chen H, Wu C, Du B, Zhang L P and Wang L. 2020. Change detection in multisource VHR images via deep siamese convolutional multiple-layers recurrent neural network. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 58(4): 2848-2864
  7. 7.
    Chen Y S, Jiang H L, Li C Y, Jia X P and Ghamisi P. 2016. Deep feature extraction and classification of hyperspectral images based on convolutional neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 54(10): 6232-6251
  8. 8.
    Chen Y S, Lin Z H, Zhao X, Wang G and Gu Y F. 2014. Deep learning-based classification of hyperspectral data. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 7(6): 2094-2107
  9. 9.
    Chen Y S, Zhao X and Jia X P. 2015. Spectral–spatial classification of hyperspectral data based on deep belief network. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 8(6): 2381-2392
  10. 10.
    Cheng G, Guo L, Zhao T Y, Han J W, Li H H and Fang J. 2013a. Automatic landslide detection from remote-sensing imagery using a scene classification method based on BoVW and pLSA. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 34(1): 45-59
  11. 11.
    Cheng G and Han J W. 2016. A survey on object detection in optical remote sensing images. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 117: 11-28
  12. 12.
    Cheng G, Han J W, Guo L, Liu Z B, Bu S H and Ren J C. 2015a. Effective and efficient midlevel visual elements-oriented land-use classification using VHR remote sensing images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 53(8): 4238-4249
  13. 13.
    Cheng G, Han J W, Guo L, Qian X L, Zhou P C, Yao X W and Hu X T. 2013b. Object detection in remote sensing imagery using a discriminatively trained mixture model. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 85: 32-43
  14. 14.
    Cheng G, Han J W and Lu X Q. 2017a. Remote sensing image scene classification: benchmark and state of the art. Proceedings of the IEEE, 105(10): 1865-1883
  15. 15.
    Cheng G, Han J W, Zhou P C and Guo L. 2014. Multi-class geospatial object detection and geographic image classification based on collection of part detectors. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 98: 119-132
  16. 16.
    Cheng G, Han J W, Zhou P C and Xu D. 2019. Learning rotation-invariant and fisher discriminative convolutional neural networks for object detection. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 28(1): 265-278
  17. 17.
    Cheng G, Li Z P, Han J W, Yao X W and Guo L. 2018a. Exploring hierarchical convolutional features for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 56(11): 6712-6722
  18. 18.
    Cheng G, Li Z P, Yao X W, Guo L and Wei Z L. 2017b. Remote sensing image scene classification using bag of convolutional features. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 14(10): 1735-1739
  19. 19.
    Cheng G, Ma C C, Zhou P C, Yao X W and Han J W. 2016a. Scene classification of high resolution remote sensing images using convolutional neural networks//2016 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS). Beijing: IEEE: 767-770
  20. 20.
    Cheng G, Si Y J, Hong H L, Yao X W and Guo L. 2020. Cross-scale feature fusion for object detection in optical remote sensing images. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters: 1-5
  21. 21.
    Cheng G, Yang C Y, Yao X W, Guo L and Han J W. 2018b. When deep learning meets metric learning: remote sensing image scene classification via learning discriminative CNNs. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 56(5): 2811-2821
  22. 22.
    Cheng G, Zhou P C and Han J W. 2016b. Learning rotation-invariant convolutional neural networks for object detection in VHR optical remote sensing images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 54(12): 7405-7415
  23. 23.
    Cheng G, Zhou P C and Han J W. 2016c. RIFD-CNN: rotation-invariant and fisher discriminative convolutional neural networks for object detection//2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Las Vegas, NV, USA: IEEE: 2884-2893
  24. 24.
    Cheng G, Zhou P C and Han J W. 2016d. Learning rotation-invariant convolutional neural networks for object detection in VHR optical remote sensing images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 54(12): 7405-7415
  25. 25.
    Cheng G, Zhou P C, Han J W, Guo L and Han J G. 2015b. Auto-encoder-based shared mid-level visual dictionary learning for scene classification using very high resolution remote sensing images. IET Computer Vision, 9(5): 639-647
  26. 26.
    Cheng L, Liu X, Li L L, Jiao L C and Tang X. 2018c. Deep adaptive proposal network for object detection in optical remote sensing images. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1807.07327
  27. 27.
    Cortes C and Vapnik V. 1995. Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 20(3): 273-297
  28. 28.
    Cover T and Hart P. 1967. Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 13(1): 21-27
  29. 29.
    Deng C, Xue Y M, Liu X L, Li C and Tao D C. 2019. Active transfer learning network: a unified deep joint spectral–spatial feature learning model for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 57(3): 1741-1754
  30. 30.
    Ding J, Xue N, Long Y, Xia G S and Lu Q K. 2019. Learning RoI transformer for oriented object detection in aerial images//2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Long Beach, CA, USA: IEEE: 2844-2853
  31. 31.
    Dópido I, Li J, Marpu P R, Plaza A, Dias J M B and Benediktsson J A. 2013. Semisupervised self-learning for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 51(7): 4032-4044
  32. 32.
    Eikvil L, Aurdal L and Koren H. 2009. Classification-based vehicle detection in high-resolution satellite images. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 64(1): 65-72
  33. 33.
    Fan Y D, Wu W, Wang W, Liu M and Wen Q. 2016. Research progress of disaster remote sensing in China. Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(5): 1170-1184
  34. 34.
    Fauvel M, Benediktsson J A, Chanussot J and Sveinsson J R. 2008. Spectral and spatial classification of hyperspectral data using SVMs and morphological profiles. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 46(11): 3804-3814
  35. 35.
    Feng X X, Han J W, Yao X W and Cheng G. 2020. Progressive contextual instance refinement for weakly supervised object detection in remote sensing images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing: 1-11
  36. 36.
    Gao L R, Gu D X, Zhuang L N, Ren J C, Yang D and Zhang B. 2020. Combining t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding with convolutional neural networks for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 17(8): 1368-1372
  37. 37.
    Geng J, Wang H Y, Fan J C and Ma X R. 2018. SAR image classification via deep recurrent encoding neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 56(4): 2255-2269
  38. 38.
    Gong J Y and Zhong Y F. 2016. Survey of intelligent optical remote sensing image processing. Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(5): 733-747
  39. 39.
    Han J W, Zhang D W, Cheng G, Guo L and Ren J C. 2015. Object detection in optical remote sensing images based on weakly supervised learning and high-level feature learning. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 53(6): 3325-3337
  40. 40.
    Han J W, Zhou P C, Zhang D W, Cheng G, Guo L, Liu Z B, Bu S H and Wu J. 2014. Efficient, simultaneous detection of multi-class geospatial targets based on visual saliency modeling and discriminative learning of sparse coding. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 89: 37-48
  41. 41.
    He K M, Zhang X Y, Ren S Q and Sun J. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition//2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Las Vegas, NV, USA: IEEE: 770-778
  42. 42.
    Hinton G E and Salakhutdinov R R. 2006. Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science, 313(5786): 504
  43. 43.
    Hu W, Huang Y Y, Wei L, Zhang F and Li H C. 2015. Deep convolutional neural networks for hyperspectral image classification. Journal of Sensors, 2015: 258619
  44. 44.
    Jia X P and Richards J A. 2002. Cluster-space representation for hyperspectral data classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 40(3): 593-598
  45. 45.
    Kang X D, Xiang X L, Li S T and Benediktsson J A. 2017. PCA-based edge-preserving features for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 55(12): 7140-7151
  46. 46.
    Kong Y, Cheng Y H, Chen C L P and Wang X S. 2019. Hyperspectral image clustering based on unsupervised broad learning. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 16(11): 1741-1745
  47. 47.
    Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I and Hinton G E. 2012. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks//Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Red Hook, United states: ACM: 1097-1105
  48. 48.
    Lei Z, Fang T, Huo H and Li D R. 2012. Rotation-invariant object detection of remotely sensed images based on texton forest and hough voting. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50(4): 1206-1217
  49. 49.
    Lei Z, Fang T and Li D R. 2011. Land cover classification for remote sensing imagery using conditional texton forest with historical land cover map. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 8(4): 720-724
  50. 50.
    Li D R, Zhang L P and Xia G S. 2014. Automatic analysis and mining of remote sensing big data. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 43(12): 1211-1216
  51. 51.
    Li J, Bioucas-Dias J M and Plaza A. 2012. Spectral–spatial hyperspectral image segmentation using subspace multinomial logistic regression and markov random fields. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50(3): 809-823
  52. 52.
    Li K, Cheng G, Bu S H and You X. 2018a. Rotation-insensitive and context-augmented object detection in remote sensing images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 56(4): 2337-2348
  53. 53.
    Li K, Wan G, Cheng G, Meng L Q and Han J W. 2020a. Object detection in optical remote sensing images: a survey and a new benchmark. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 159: 296-307
  54. 54.
    Li S S, Zhang B, Li A, Jia X P, Gao L R and Peng M. 2013. Hyperspectral imagery clustering with neighborhood constraints. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 10(3): 588-592
  55. 55.
    Li S T, Song W W, Fang L Y, Chen Y S, Ghamisi P and Benediktsson J A. 2019. Deep learning for hyperspectral image classification: an overview. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 57(9): 6690-6709
  56. 56.
    Li Y S, Zhang Y J, Huang X and Yuille A L. 2018b. Deep networks under scene-level supervision for multi-class geospatial object detection from remote sensing images. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 146: 182-196
  57. 57.
    Li Z L, Xu K, Xie J F, Bi Q and Qin K. 2020b. Deep multiple instance convolutional neural networks for learning robust scene representations. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 58(5): 3685-3702
  58. 58.
    Lillesand T M, Kiefer R W and Chipman J W. 2015. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation. 7th ed. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons
  59. 59.
    Liu Q H, Kampffmeyer M, Jenssen R and Salberg A B. 2020. Dense dilated convolutions' merging network for land cover classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 58(9): 6309-6320
  60. 60.
    Liu W, Su F L and Huang X. 2019. Unsupervised adversarial domain adaptation network for semantic segmentation. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters: 1-5
  61. 61.
    Lu X Q, Sun H and Zheng X T. 2019. A feature aggregation convolutional neural network for remote sensing scene classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 57(10): 7894-7906
  62. 62.
    Lu X Q, Wang B Q, Zheng X T and Li X L. 2018. Exploring models and data for remote sensing image caption generation. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 56(4): 2183-2195
  63. 63.
    Luo R, Wang L, Xiao Y J, He Y and Zhao D F. 2020. Application of deep learning technology in military field. Command Control and Simulation, 42(1): 1-5
  64. 64.
    Ma D G, Tang P and Zhao L J. 2019. SiftingGAN: generating and sifting labeled samples to improve the remote sensing image scene classification baseline in vitro. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 16(7): 1046-1050
  65. 65.
    Ma L, Crawford M M and Tian J. 2010. Local manifold learning-based k-nearest-neighbor for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 48(11): 4099-4109
  66. 66.
    Mei A X. 2001. An Introduction to Remote Sensing. Beijing: Higher Education Press
  67. 67.
    Mou L C, Bruzzone L and Zhu X X. 2019. Learning spectral-spatial-temporal features via a recurrent convolutional neural network for change detection in multispectral imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 57(2): 924-935
  68. 68.
    Mou L C, Ghamisi P and Zhu X X. 2017. Deep recurrent neural networks for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 55(7): 3639-3655
  69. 69.
    Mountrakis G, Im J and Ogole C. 2011. Support vector machines in remote sensing: a review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 66(3): 247-259
  70. 70.
    Olshausen B A and Field D J. 1996. Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature, 381(6583): 607-609
  71. 71.
    Peng C, Li Y Y, Jiao L C, Chen Y Q and Shang R H. 2019. Densely based multi-scale and multi-modal fully convolutional networks for high-resolution remote-sensing image semantic segmentation. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 12(8): 2612-2626
  72. 72.
    Persello C and Bruzzone L. 2014. Active and semisupervised learning for the classification of remote sensing images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 52(11): 6937-6956
  73. 73.
    Redmon J, Divvala S, Girshick R and Farhadi A. 2016. You only look once: unified, real-time object detection//2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Las Vegas, NV, USA: IEEE: 779-788
  74. 74.
    Ren S Q, He K M, Girshick R and Sun J. 2017. Faster R-CNN: towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 39(6): 1137-1149
  75. 75.
    Simonyan K and Zisserman A. 2014. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1409.1556
  76. 76.
    Szegedy C, Liu W, Jia Y Q, Sermanet P, Reed S, Anguelov D, Erhan D, Vanhoucke V and Rabinovich A. 2015. Going deeper with convolutions//2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Boston, MA, USA: IEEE: 1-9
  77. 77.
    Tang J X, Deng C W, Huang G B and Zhao B J. 2015. Compressed-domain ship detection on spaceborne optical image using deep neural network and extreme learning machine. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 53(3): 1174-1185
  78. 78.
    Tao Z and Nevatia R. 2001. Car detection in low resolution aerial image//Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. Vancouver, BC, Canada: IEEE: 710-717
  79. 79.
    Tong Q X, Zhang B and Zhang L F. 2016. Current progress of hyperspectral remote sensing in China. Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(5): 689-707
  80. 80.
    Tong X D. 2016. Development of China high-resolution earth observation system. Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(5): 775-780
  81. 81.
    Vincent P, Larochelle H, Lajoie I, Bengio Y and Manzagol P A. 2010. Stacked denoising autoencoders: learning useful representations in a deep network with a local denoising criterion. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11(12): 3371-3408
  82. 82.
    Wang Q, Liu S T, Chanussot J and Li X L. 2019a. Scene classification with recurrent attention of VHR remote sensing images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 57(2): 1155-1167
  83. 83.
    Wang R, Nie F P, Wang Z, He F and Li X L. 2019b. Scalable graph-based clustering with nonnegative relaxation for large hyperspectral image. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 57(10): 7352-7364
  84. 84.
    Wang S G, Wang M, Yang S Y and Jiao L C. 2017. New hierarchical saliency filtering for fast ship detection in high-resolution SAR images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 55(1): 351-362
  85. 85.
    Wang Y B, Zhang L Q, Tong X H, Nie F P, Huang H Y and Mei J. 2018. LRAGE: learning latent relationships with adaptive graph embedding for aerial scene classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 56(2): 621-634
  86. 86.
    Wang Y B, Zhang L Q, Tong X H, Zhang L, Zhang Z X, Liu H, Xing X Y and Mathiopoulos P T. 2016. A three-layered graph-based learning approach for remote sensing image retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 54(10): 6020-6034
  87. 87.
    Wang Z Y, Nasrabadi N M and Huang T S. 2015. Semisupervised hyperspectral classification using task-driven dictionary learning with laplacian regularization. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 53(3): 1161-1173
  88. 88.
    Xia G S, Bai X, Ding J, Zhu Z, Belongie S, Luo J B, Datcu M, Pelillo M and Zhang L P. 2018. DOTA: a large-scale dataset for object detection in aerial images//2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Salt Lake City, UT, United States: IEEE: 3974-3983
  89. 89.
    Xia G S, Hu J W, Hu F, Shi B G, Bai X, Zhong Y F, Zhang L P and Lu X Q. 2017. AID: a benchmark data set for performance evaluation of aerial scene classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 55(7): 3965-3981
  90. 90.
    Xu F, Yang W, Jiang T B, Lin S J, Luo H and Xia G S. 2020. Mental retrieval of remote sensing images via adversarial sketch-image feature learning. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing: 1-14
  91. 91.
    Xu X D, Li W, Ran Q, Du Q, Gao L R and Zhang B. 2018. Multisource remote sensing data classification based on convolutional neural network. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 56(2): 937-949
  92. 92.
    Xu Z Z, Xu X, Wang L, Yang R and Pu F L. 2017. Deformable convnet with aspect ratio constrained NMS for object detection in remote sensing imagery. Remote Sensing, 9(12): 1312
  93. 93.
    Yang G and Liu X N. 2004. The present research condition and development trend of remotely sensed imagery interpretation. Remote Sensing for Land and Resources, 16(2): 7-10, 15
  94. 94.
    Yang W, Yin X S and Xia G S. 2015. Learning high-level features for satellite image classification with limited labeled samples. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 53(8): 4472-4482
  95. 95.
    Yao W, Dumitru C O, Loffeld O and Datcu M. 2016a. Semi-supervised hierarchical clustering for semantic SAR image annotation. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 9(5): 1993-2008
  96. 96.
    Yao X W, Feng X X, Han J W, Cheng G and Guo L. 2020. Automatic weakly supervised object detection from high spatial resolution remote sensing images via dynamic curriculum learning. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
  97. 97.
    Yao X W, Han J W, Cheng G, Qian X M and Guo L. 2016b. Semantic annotation of high-resolution satellite images via weakly supervised learning. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 54(6): 3660-3671
  98. 98.
    Yao X W, Han J W, Guo L, Bu S H and Liu Z B. 2015. A coarse-to-fine model for airport detection from remote sensing images using target-oriented visual saliency and CRF. Neurocomputing, 164: 162-172
  99. 99.
    You H F, Tian S W, Yu L and Lv Y L. 2020. Pixel-level remote sensing image recognition based on bidirectional word vectors. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 58(2): 1281-1293
  100. 100.
    Yu H Y, Gao L R, Li W, Du Q and Zhang B. 2017a. Locality sensitive discriminant analysis for group sparse representation-based hyperspectral imagery classification. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 14(8): 1358-1362
  101. 101.
    Yu H Y, Gao L R, Liao W Z, Zhang B, Pižurica A and Philips W. 2017b. Multiscale superpixel-level subspace-based support vector machines for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 14(11): 2142-2146
  102. 102.
    Yu H Y, Shang X D, Zhang X, Gao L R, Song M P and Hu J C. 2020. Hyperspectral image classification based on adjacent constraint representation. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters: 1-5
  103. 103.
    Zhang B, Li S S, Jia X P, Gao L R and Peng M. 2011. Adaptive markov random field approach for classification of hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 8(5): 973-977
  104. 104.
    Zhang D W, Han J W, Cheng G, Liu Z B, Bu S H and Guo L. 2015. Weakly supervised learning for target detection in remote sensing images. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 12(4): 701-705
  105. 105.
    Zhang F, Du B, Zhang L P and Xu M Z. 2016a. Weakly supervised learning based on coupled convolutional neural networks for aircraft detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 54(9): 5553-5563
  106. 106.
    Zhang Q P and Couloigner I. 2006. Benefit of the angular texture signature for the separation of parking lots and roads on high resolution multi-spectral imagery. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(9): 937-946
  107. 107.
    Zhang X R, Song Q, Gao Z Y, Zheng Y G, Weng P and Jiao L C. 2016b. Spectral-spatial feature learning using cluster-based group sparse coding for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 9(9): 4142-4159
  108. 108.
    Zhao Z Q, Jiao L C, Liu F, Zhao J Q and Chen P H. 2016. Semisupervised discriminant feature learning for SAR image category via sparse ensemble. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 54(6): 3532-3547
  109. 109.
    Zheng C, Zhang Y and Wang L G. 2017. Semantic segmentation of remote sensing imagery using an object-based markov random field model with auxiliary label fields. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 55(5): 3015-3028
  110. 110.
    Zhong P, Gong Z Q, Li S T and Schönlieb C B. 2017. Learning to diversify deep belief networks for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 55(6): 3516-3530
  111. 111.
    Zhong P and Wang R S. 2007. A multiple conditional random fields ensemble model for urban area detection in remote sensing optical images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 45(12): 3978-3988
  112. 112.
    Zhou P C, Cheng G, Liu Z B, Bu S H and Hu X T. 2016. Weakly supervised target detection in remote sensing images based on transferred deep features and negative bootstrapping. Multidimensional Systems and Signal Processing, 27(4): 925-944
  113. 113.
    Zhou P C, Han J W, Cheng G and Zhang B C. 2019a. Learning compact and discriminative stacked autoencoder for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 57(7): 4823-4833
  114. 114.
    Zhou X L, Chen X J and Chen S Y. 2019b. Weakly supervised learning-based object detection: a survey. Computer Science, 46(11): 49-57
  115. 115.
    Zhou Z H. 2013. Disagreement-based semi-supervised learning. Acta Automatica Sinica, 39(11): 1871-1878
  116. 116.
    Zhou Z H. 2016. Machine Learning. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2016 (周志华. 2016. 机器学习. 北京: 清华大学出版社)
  117. 117.
    Zhou Z H. 2018. A brief introduction to weakly supervised learning. National Science Review, 5(1): 44-53
  118. 118.
    Zhu C, Shi W, Pesaresi M, Liu L, Chen X and King B. 2005. The recognition of road network from high-resolution satellite remotely sensed data using image morphological characteristics. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26(24): 5493-5508
  119. 119.
    Zhu L, Chen Y S, Ghamisi P and Benediktsson J A. 2018. Generative adversarial networks for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 56(9): 5046-5063

Leer el texto completo

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website