Anterior|Siguiente

Small water body extraction method based on Sentinel-2 satellite multi-spectral remote sensing image

  • role： First author第一作者
  • Affiliation：

    College of Geography and Tourism, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241000, China

  • Email：wuqing@ahnu.edu.cn
  • Introduction：吴庆双，研究方向为GIS应用于遥感分析。E-mail：wuqing@ahnu.edu.cn
WU Qingshuang1,  
  • Affiliation：

    College of Geography and Tourism, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241000, China

    Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China

WANG Mingxiu12,  
  • role： Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation：

    Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China

  • Email：shenqian@nadi.ac.cn
  • Introduction：申茜，研究方向为内陆水环境遥感，黑臭水体遥感。E-mail：shenqian@nadi.ac.cn
SHEN Qian2*,  
  • Affiliation：

    Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China

YAO Yue2,  
  • Affiliation：

    Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China

LI Junsheng2,  
  • Affiliation：

    Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China

ZHANG Fangfang2,  
  • Affiliation：

    Ministry of Ecology and Environment Center for Satellite Application on Ecology and Environment, Beijing 100094, China

ZHOU Yaming3

resumen

The water body extraction algorithm based on satellite remote sensing is mainly aimed at large- and medium-sized lakes or large rivers. When applied to small water bodies, misjudging often occurs. The multi-spectral remote sensing data of the Sentinel 2 satellite has a spatial resolution of 10, 20, and 60 meters; a dual-star time resolution of 5 days; and a high temporal and spatial resolution. Therefore, this paper uses the sentinel-2 green light band (560 nm), red-edge band (705 nm), near-infrared band (842 nm, 865 nm), and short wave-infrared band (2190 nm) for remote sensing reflectance. A new water index algorithm (red edge-based water index, RWI for short) is proposed for the extraction of fine water. The normalized remote sensing reflectance of vegetation, shadow, building, mixed pixel, bare soil, and water body is compared and analyzed. The mechanism explains why RWI has a better effect of extracting fine water bodies compared with other water body indexes.To quantitatively evaluate the advantages of the RWI water body extraction algorithm proposed in this paper, this paper compares several current water body extraction algorithms, including the improved normalized difference water index MNDWI (modified normalized difference water index), multi-band water body index MBWI (multi-band water index), and AWEI (automatic water extraction index). The water body extraction results obtained by several algorithms and the area statistics of the artificial water interpretation of the water body results are calculated using the error formula to obtain RWI. The errors of MNDWI, MBWI, AWEIsh, and AWEInsh are 3.6%, 4.2%, 12.2%, 8.8%, and 19.8%, respectively. Results show that the RWI algorithm has the highest accuracy. At the same time, through analysis, the advantages and disadvantages of several water extraction results are quantitatively evaluated. From the results of image extraction, this paper proposes that the water boundary extraction method extracted by the RWI water body extraction algorithm is better, and it can eliminate mountains, building shadows, and clouds. The effect of shadows can eliminate the effects of mixed pixels.At the same time, this paper carried out multi-temporal water extraction in Xiong’an New District, Shendong Mining Area, and Yongcheng Mining Area. In the time range from January 2016 to December 2018, a total of 43 Sentinel-2 images without clouds were screened, and the small broken water bodies in the three areas of Xiong’an New District, Shendong Mining Area, and Yongcheng Mining Area were selected by the algorithm proposed in this paper. The distribution carried out multi-temporal analysis. Results from statistical area analysis indicate that Xiong’an New District has the largest water body area in spring, followed by summer and autumn. No significant change in water area was observed in the Shendong and Yongcheng mining areas. After careful observation, the results of each phase are very good, the boundary of the small water body is highly differentiated, and no data are misleading or missing, and the algorithm has good applicability and stability.

palabra clave

water extraction;water body index;small water body;Sentinel-2;RWI;MNDWI;MBWI;AWEI

References

  1. 1.
    Cao R L, Li C J, Liu L Y, Wang J H and Yan G J. 2008. Extracting Miyun reservoir’s water area and monitoring its change based on a revised normalized different water index. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 33(2): 158-160
  2. 2.
    Chen J. 2010. Study on Obiect-based Classification of High-resolution Remote Sensing Imagery. Changsha: Central South University
  3. 3.
    Danaher T and Collett L. 2006. Development optimisation and multi-temporal application of a simple Landsat based water index//Proceedings of the 13th Australasian Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry Conference. Canberra: Spatial Sciences Institute
  4. 4.
    Ding F. 2009. Study on information extraction of water body with a new water index (NWI). Science of Surveying and Mapping, 34(4): 155-157
  5. 5.
    Du Y, Zhang Y H, Ling F, Wang Q M, Li W B and Li X D. 2016. Water bodies’ mapping from sentinel-2 imagery with modified normalized difference water index at 10-m spatial resolution produced by sharpening the SWIR band. Remote Sensing, 8(4): 354
  6. 6.
    European Space Agency. 2015. ESA standard document[S/OL]. (2015-07-24)[2020-01-08].
  7. 7.
    Feyisa G L, Meilby H, Fensholt R and Proud S R. 2014. Automated water extraction index: a new technique for surface water mapping using Landsat imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 140: 23-35
  8. 8.
    Fisher A, Flood N and Danaher T. 2016. Comparing Landsat water index methods for automated water classification in eastern Australia. Remote Sensing of Environment, 175: 167-182
  9. 9.
    Hong L, Huang Y J, Yang K, Peng S Y and Xu Q L. 2019. Study on urban surface water extraction from heterogeneous environments using GF-2 remotely sensed images. Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(5): 871-882
  10. 10.
    Ji H X, Fan X W, Wu G P and Liu Y B. 2015. Accuracy comparison and analysis of methods for water area extraction of discrete lakes. Journal of Lake Sciences, 27(2): 327-334
  11. 11.
    Jiang H, Feng M, Zhu Y Q, Lu N, Huang J X and Xiao T. 2014. An automated method for extracting rivers and lakes from Landsat imagery. Remote Sensing, 6(6): 5067-5089
  12. 12.
    Lu S L, Wu B F, Yan N N and Wang H. 2011. Water body mapping method with HJ-1A/B satellite imagery. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 13(3): 428-434
  13. 13.
    McFeeters S K. 1996. The use of the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17(7): 1425-1432
  14. 14.
    Wang D Z, Wang S M and Huang C. 2019. Comparison of Sentinel-2 imagery with Landsat8 imagery for surface water extraction using four common water indexes. Remote Sensing for Land and Resources, 31(3): 157-165
  15. 15.
    Wang X B, Xie S P and Du J K. 2018. Water index formulation and its effectiveness research on the complicated surface water surroundings. Journal of Remote Sensing, 22(2): 360-372
  16. 16.
    Wang X B, Xie S P, Zhang X L, Chen C, Guo H, Du J K and Duan Z. 2018a. A robust Multi-Band Water Index (MBWI) for automated extraction of surface water from Landsat 8 OLI imagery. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 68: 73-91
  17. 17.
    Wang Z F, Liu J G, Li J B and Zhang D D. 2018b. Multi-spectral water index (MuWI): a native 10-m multi-spectral water index for accurate water mapping on sentinel-2. Remote Sensing, 10(10): 1643
  18. 18.
    Xiao Y F, Zhao W J and Zhu L. 2010. A study on information extraction of water body using band1 and band7 of TM imagery. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 35(5): 226-227, 216
  19. 19.
    Xu H Q. 2005. A study on information extraction of water body with the modified normalized difference water index (MNDWI). Journal of Remote Sensing, 9(5): 589-595
  20. 20.
    Xu H Q. 2008. Comment on the enhanced water index (EWI): a discussion on the creation of a water index. Geo-Information Science, 10(6): 776-780
  21. 21.
    Yan P, Zhang Y J and Zhang Y. 2007. A study on information extraction of water system in semi-arid regions with the enhanced water index (EWI) and GIS based noise remove techniques. Remote Sensing Information, (6): 62-67
  22. 22.
    Yang X C, Qin Q M, Grussenmeyer P and Koehl M. 2018. Urban surface water body detection with suppressed built-up noise based on water indices from Sentinel-2 MSI imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 219: 259-270
  23. 23.
    Yang Y and Ruan R Z. 2010. Extraction of plain lake water body based on TM imagery. Remote Sensing Information, (3): 60-64
  24. 24.
    Yin Q J and Yang Y L. 2005. Remote sensing monitoring of lake Qinghai based on EOS/MODIS Data. Journal of Lake Sciences, 17(4): 356-360
  25. 25.
    Zhang M H. 2008. Extracting water-body information with improved medal of spectal relationship in a higher mountain area. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 24(2): 14-16, 22

Leer el texto completo

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website