Anterior|Siguiente

Progresses in integrated application methods of geographic analysis models for virtual geographic environment construction

  • role： First author第一作者
  • Affiliation：

    School of Geography, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China

    Key Laboratory of Virtual Geographic Environment (Nanjing Normal University), Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210023, China

    Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Nanjing 210023, China

  • Email：yuesongshan@njnu.edu.cn
  • Introduction：乐松山，研究方向为地理场景建模、虚拟地理环境、泛在数据挖掘。E-mail： yuesongshan@njnu.edu.cn
YUE Songshan,  
  • Affiliation：

    School of Geography, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China

    Key Laboratory of Virtual Geographic Environment (Nanjing Normal University), Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210023, China

    Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Nanjing 210023, China

LYU Guonian,  
  • Affiliation：

    School of Geography, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China

    Key Laboratory of Virtual Geographic Environment (Nanjing Normal University), Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210023, China

    Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Nanjing 210023, China

WEN Yongning,  
  • role： Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation：

    School of Geography, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China

    Key Laboratory of Virtual Geographic Environment (Nanjing Normal University), Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210023, China

    Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Nanjing 210023, China

  • Email：chenmin0902@163.com
  • Introduction：陈旻，研究方向为开放式地理建模与模拟、虚拟地理环境。E-mail： chenmin0902@163.com
CHEN Min*

resumen

Geographic analysis models serve as crucial resources for tackling geo-problems, simulating geographic environments, and supporting decision-making analysis. They play a key role in constructing virtual geographic environments (also known as digital twin geographic environments). Integrating geographic analysis models with diverse simulation capabilities from various fields enables a comprehensive representation of real geographical environments. This integration supports the development of visual, usable, analyzable, and interactive virtual geographic environments.This study systematically examines the current research progress in the integration methods of geographic analysis models. In general, integrating physical and social processes and merging big data with deep learning have gained increased attention in recent years. Compared with using a single model, multimodel integration enhances the understanding of the objective geographical world by integrating multiple elements and processes. Integrating models within a single domain or across domains ultimately involves basic execution links, such as combining, nesting, and connecting multiple models in a specific computing environment. In response to this, customized integration and modular integration are the main approaches to current geographical analysis model integration research. Customized integration offers tailored solutions for specific models considering cognitive and technical characteristics. However, it is heavily influenced by individual model characteristics and may become unsustainable during the integration of numerous models, leading to frequent revision activities. Modular integration relies on standardized components with clear association logic and supports component replacement. However, it faces strong technical dependencies and constraints, such as those that involve programming language, data structure, and operating environment. In practice, current model integration research often varies between customization and modularity, with the former lacking sustainability and the latter being limited by compatibility issues.In this study, the idea of a “geographic analysis model container” is proposed, and the methods are implemented to address the problems mentioned. With the assistance of the concept of containerization, the data, programs, and computing resources upon which geographical models rely are loaded into a “container.” Then, the model is developed in a customized manner within the container, while the modular model integration work occurs outside the container. Striking a balance between customized and modular approaches is anticipated to enhance the overall effectiveness of geographic modeling and simulation efforts. Conducting a multilevel, multigranularity, and multiscale integration across elements, processes, and functional relationships is necessary for addressing specific geographical problems. The development of “geographic analysis model containers” tailored to express geographical system evolution laws and driving mechanisms has become crucial.Accumulating and improving model integration capabilities based on containers is expected to establish an effective bridge between model construction, transformation, and integration. This advancement can promote geographical models from experimental tools to essential components of social service infrastructure. Decision-making analysis, solution simulation, and customized planning capabilities can be provided for various digital twin geographical scenarios (such as digital twin cities, digital twin river basins, and digital twin water conservancies) by integrating geographical analysis models. This integration drives advancements in digital twins, metaverses, and digital human technology, spanning visual experiences, operation, and maintenance management. It also incorporates geographical knowledge, enhances interactive functions, and promotes a comprehensive understanding.

palabra clave

remote sensing;geographical analysis models;virtual geographic environment;digital twin geographic environment;model integration;geographical analysis model container

References

  1. 1.
    Bao Q, Lin P F, Zhou T J, Liu Y M, Yu Y Q, Wu G X, He B, He J, Li L J, Li J D, Li Y C, Liu H L, Qiao F L, Song Z Y, Wang B, Wang J, Wang P F, Wang X C, Wang Z Z, Wu B, Wu T W, Xu Y F, Yu H Y, Zhao W, Zheng W P and Zhou L J. 2013. The flexible global ocean-atmosphere-land system model, spectral version 2: FGOALS-s2. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 30(3): 561-576
  2. 2.
    Batty M. 1997. Virtual geography. Futures, 29(4/5): 337-352
  3. 3.
    Batty M. 2018. Digital twins. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 45(5): 817-820
  4. 4.
    Binkowski F S and Roselle S J. 2003. Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model aerosol component 1. Model description. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 108(D6): 4183
  5. 5.
    Birant D and Kut A. 2007. ST-DBSCAN: an algorithm for clustering spatial-temporal data. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 60(1): 208-221
  6. 6.
    Brunsdon C, Fotheringham S and Charlton M. 1998. Geographically weighted regression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 47(3): 431-443
  7. 7.
    Bu X Q, Yue P, Zhang M D and Wang L N. 2016. A geoscientific workflow scripting approach for integration of distributed multiple source geoprocessing packages. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 41(10): 159-164
  8. 8.
    Chassin T, Ingensand J, Christophe S and Touya G. 2022. Experiencing virtual geographic environment in urban 3D participatory e-planning: a user perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 224: 104432
  9. 9.
    Chen C S, Liu H D and Beardsley R C. 2003. An unstructured grid, finite-volume, three-dimensional, primitive equations ocean model: application to coastal ocean and estuaries. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 20(1): 159-186
  10. 10.
    Chen M, Lü G N, Zhou C H, Lin H, Ma Z Y, Yue S S, Wen Y N, Zhang F Y, Wang J, Zhu Z Y, Xu K and He Y Q. 2021. Geographic modeling and simulation systems for geographic research in the new era: some thoughts on their development and construction. Science China Earth Sciences, 64(8): 1207-1223
  11. 11.
    Chen M, Yue S S, Lü G N, Lin H, Yang C W, Wen Y N, Hou T, Xiao D W and Jiang H. 2019. Teamwork-oriented integrated modeling method for geo-problem solving. Environmental Modelling and Software, 119: 111-123
  12. 12.
    Chen Y Y, Gan S, Tian Y D and Zhou X B. 2015. GIS spatial modeling in mountainous land evaluation. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 27(2): 196-200
  13. 13.
    Cheng C X, Zhou C H and Lu F. 2003. The improved base state with amendments spatio-temporal model in the object-relation GIS. Journal of Image and Graphics, 8(6): 697-702
  14. 14.
    Cheng G D, Xiao H L, Fu B J, Xiao D N, Zheng C M, Kang S Z, Yan X D, Wang Y, An L Z, Li X B, Chen Y Y, Leng S Y, Wang Y H, Yang D W, Li X Y, Zhang G L, Zheng Y R, Liu Q H and Zou S B. 2014. Advances in synthetic research on the eco-hydrological process of the Heihe River Basin. Advances in Earth Science, 29(4): 431-437
  15. 15.
    Choi E S, Lavier L and Gurnis M. 2008. Thermomechanics of mid-ocean ridge segmentation. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 171(1/4): 374-386
  16. 16.
    Collins D B G, Bras R L and Tucker G E. 2004. Modeling the effects of vegetation-erosion coupling on landscape evolution. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 109(F3): F03004
  17. 17.
    Coon E T and Shuai P. 2022. Watershed Workflow: a toolset for parameterizing data-intensive, integrated hydrologic models. Environmental Modelling and Software, 157: 105502
  18. 18.
    Cova T J and Goodchild M F. 2002. Extending geographical representation to include fields of spatial objects. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 16(6): 509-532
  19. 19.
    Cui X H, Xie J F, Zhang F, Ding L, Li Z S, Hao Z H, Liu Y and Zhao Q C. 2017. Establishment of PM2.5 forecasting model based on deep learning. Beijing Surveying and Mapping, (6): 22-27
  20. 20.
    David O, Ascough J C II, Lloyd W, Green T R, Rojas K W, Leavesley G H and Ahuja L R. 2013. A software engineering perspective on environmental modeling framework design: the object modeling system. Environmental Modelling and Software, 39: 201-213
  21. 21.
    Davis C, Wang W, Chen S S, Chen Y S, Corbosiero K, DeMaria M, Dudhia J, Holland G, Klemp J, Michalakes J, Reeves H, Rotunno R, Snyder C and Xiao Q N. 2008. Prediction of landfalling hurricanes with the advanced hurricane WRF model. Monthly Weather Review, 136(6): 1990-2005
  22. 22.
    Di L P. 2004. GeoBrain-A web services based geospatial knowledge building system//Paper presented at the NASA Earth Science Technology Conference. Palo Alto
  23. 23.
    Douglas-Mankin K R, Srinivasan R and Arnold J G. 2010. Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model: current developments and applications. Transactions of the ASABE, 53(5): 1423-1431
  24. 24.
    Falkowski P, Scholes R J, Boyle E, Canadell J, Canfield D, Elser J, Gruber N, Hibbard K, Högberg P, Linder S, Mackenzie F T, Moore B Ⅲ, Pedersen T, Rosenthal Y, Seitzinger S, Smetacek V and Steffen W. 2000. The global carbon cycle: a test of our knowledge of earth as a system. Science, 290(5490): 291-296
  25. 25.
    Fan J. 2018. “Territorial System of Human-environment Interaction”: a theoretical cornerstone for comprehensive research on formation and evolution of the geographical pattern. Acta Geographica Sinica, 73(4): 597-607
  26. 26.
    Fang W J. 2017. Urban Road Traffic Noise Prediction Based on RLS90 and Traffic Flow Factors Analysis. Xi’an: Chang’an University
  27. 27.
    Foley J A, Prentice I C, Ramankutty N, Levis S, Pollard D, Sitch S and Haxeltine A. 1996. An integrated biosphere model of land surface processes, terrestrial carbon balance, and vegetation dynamics. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 10(4): 603-628
  28. 28.
    Fu B J. 2018. Thoughts on the recent development of physical geography. Progress in Geography, 37(1): 1-7
  29. 29.
    Fu Z Y, Xu R Z and Liu W Q. 2016. Research on terrorist attack warning model based on Bayesian network. Journal of Catastrophology, 31(3): 184-189
  30. 30.
    Gong J H, Li W H, Zhang G Y, Shen S, Huang L and Sun J. 2018. An augmented geographic environment for geo-process visualization--a case of crowd evacuation simulation. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 47(8): 1089-1097
  31. 31.
    Gong J H, Zhou J P and Zhang L H. 2010. Study progress and theorectical framework of virtual geographic environments. Advances in Earth Science, 25(9): 915-926
  32. 32.
    Gong J Y. 1997. An object oriented spatio temporal data model in GIS. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 26(4): 289-298
  33. 33.
    Goodall J L, Saint K D, Ercan M B, Briley L J, Murphy S, You H H, DeLuca C and Rood R B. 2013. Coupling climate and hydrological models: interoperability through Web Services. Environmental Modelling and Software, 46: 250-259
  34. 34.
    Goodchild M F, Yuan M and Cova T J. 2007. Towards a general theory of geographic representation in GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 21(3): 239-260
  35. 35.
    Griffith D A and Peres-Neto P R. 2006. Spatial modeling in ecology: the flexibility of eigenfunction spatial analyses. Ecology, 87(10): 2603-2613 [DOI: [2603:SMIETF]2.0.CO;2]
  36. 36.
    Guenther A, Karl T, Harley P, Wiedinmyer C, Palmer P I and Geron C. 2006. Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature). Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 6(11): 3181-3210
  37. 37.
    Guo R Z, Lin H J, He B and Zhao Z G. 2020. GIS framework for smart cities. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 45(12): 1829-1835
  38. 38.
    Habtu W and Jayappa K S. 2022. Assessment of soil erosion extent using RUSLE model integrated with GIS and RS: the case of Megech-Dirma watershed, Northwest Ethiopia. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 194(5): 318
  39. 39.
    Hill C, DeLuca C, Balaji, Suarez M and Da Silva A. 2004. The architecture of the earth system modeling framework. Computing in Science and Engineering, 6(1): 18-28
  40. 40.
    Huang H S. 2009. Complete integration of GIS with resource and environmental model. Journal of Computer Applications, 29(S1): 362-365
  41. 41.
    Huber W C and Dickinson R E. 1988. Storm Water Management Model, Version 4: User’s Manual. Athens: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  42. 42.
    Hughes J D, Russcher M J, Langevin C D, Morway E D and McDonald R R. 2022. The MODFLOW Application Programming Interface for simulation control and software interoperability. Environmental Modelling and Software, 148: 105257
  43. 43.
    Johansson L, Karppinen A, Kurppa M, Kousa A, Niemi J V and Kukkonen J. 2022. An operational urban air quality model ENFUSER, based on dispersion modelling and data assimilation. Environmental Modelling and Software, 156: 105460
  44. 44.
    Kim S H, Edmonds J, Lurz J, Smith S J and Wise M. 2006. The ObjECTS framework for integrated assessment: hybrid modeling of transportation. The Energy Journal, 27(2S): 63-91
  45. 45.
    Korzukhin M D, Ter-Mikaelian M T and Wagner R G. 1996. Process versus empirical models: which approach for forest ecosystem management?. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 26(5): 879-887
  46. 46.
    Langran G. 1992. Time in Geographic Information Systems. London: CRC Press
  47. 47.
    Li D, Liu X P, Luo Y and Wang Y F. 2016. Sensitivity analysis of the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (MAUP) in simulating urban expansion dynamic using cellular automata. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 32(5): 14-21
  48. 48.
    Li D R, Gong J Y and Bian F L. 1994. Data organization and processing methods of GIS. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, (1): 28-37
  49. 49.
    Li L H, Lei B B and Mao C L. 2022. Digital twin in smart manufacturing. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 26: 100289
  50. 50.
    Li L J, Lin P F, Yu Y Q, Wang B, Zhou T J, Liu L, Liu J P, Bao Q, Xu S M, Huang W Y, Xia K, Pu Y, Dong L, Shen S, Liu Y M, Hu N, Liu M M, Sun W Q, Shi X J, Zheng W P, Wu B, Song M R, Liu H L, Zhang X H, Wu G X, Xue W, Huang X M, Yang G W, Song Z Y and Qiao F L. 2013. The flexible global ocean-atmosphere-land system model, Grid-point Version 2: FGOALS-g2. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 30(3): 543-560
  51. 51.
    Li Q Q and Li D R. 2014. Big data GIS. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 39(6): 641-644, 666
  52. 52.
    Li S C, Zhang W B, Chen L Y, Liang Z, Zhang Y J and Wang Z. 2022. Digital twin space and its applications: concurrent discussion on the space reconstruction of geographical research. Acta Geographica Sinica, 77(3): 507-517
  53. 53.
    Li X, Yang Q S and Liu X P. 2007. Knowledge mining and planning scenario simulation of urban evolution based on CA. Scientia Sinica (Terrae), 37(9): 1242-1251
  54. 54.
    Li X L and Yin H. 2019. Research on event-level space-time model for government text data. Jiangxi Science, 37(6): 958-963, 988
  55. 55.
    Li Y L, Zhang Q, Yao J and Li X H. 2013. Integrated simulation of hydrological and hydrodynamic processes for Lake Poyang catchment system. Journal of Lake Sciences, 25(2): 227-235
  56. 56.
    Lin H, Chen M, Lu G N, Zhu Q, Gong J H, You X, Wen Y N, Xu B L and Hu M Y. 2013. Virtual Geographic Environments (VGEs): a new generation of geographic analysis tool. Earth-Science Reviews, 126: 74-84
  57. 57.
    Lin H, Hu M Y, Chen M, Zhang F, You L and Chen Y T. 2020. Cognitive transformation from geographic information system to virtual geographic environments. Journal of Geo-Information Science, 22(4): 662-672
  58. 58.
    Lin H, Xu B L, Chen Y T, Jing Q and You L. 2022. The virtual geographic environments: more than the digital twin of the physical geographical environments//Li B, Shi X, Zhu A X, Wang C Z and Lin H, eds. New Thinking in GIScience. Singapore: Springer: 17-28
  59. 59.
    Lin Y L, Huang X M, Liang Y S, Qin Y, Xu S M, Huang W Y, Xu F H, Liu L, Wang Y, Peng Y R, Wang L N, Xue W, Fu H H, Zhang G J, Wang B, Li R Z, Zhang C, Lu H, Yang K, Luo Y, Bai Y Q, Song Z Y, Wang M Q, Zhao W J, Zhang F, Xu J H, Zhao X, Lu C S, Luo Y Q, Chen Y Z, Hu Y, Tang Q, Chen D X, Yang G W and Gong P. 2019. The Community Integrated Earth System Model (CIESM) from Tsinghua University and its plan for CMIP6 experiments. Climate Change Research, 15(5): 545-550
  60. 60.
    Liu C Z, Chao Q C, Wang S R and Liu Z Y. 2023. The research progress of hydrologic cycle in hydrometeorology. Climate Change Research, 19(1): 1-10
  61. 61.
    Liu H M, Fang C L, Li Y H. 2019. The Coupled Human and Natural Cube: A conceptual framework for analyzing urbanization and eco-environment interactions. Acta Geographica Sinica, 74(8): 1489-1507
  62. 62.
    Liu L, Ji J K, Song G W, Liao W W, Yu H J and Liu W J. 2019. Hotspot prediction of public property crime based on spatial differentiation of crime and built environment. Journal of Geo-Information Science, 21(11): 1655-1668
  63. 63.
    Liu R Y and Liu N. 2002. A study on spatio-temporal process and storage in dynamic land management system. Journal of Image and Graphics, 7(4): 388-393
  64. 64.
    Liu W, Yang C Y, Li Y D and Shi X K. 2018. The development and application of the WRF-POM regional air-sea coupled model based on the MCT coupler. Marine Sciences, 42(5): 98-107
  65. 65.
    Liu X Y. 2010. Implementation of sea ice-ocean coupled model in form of coupler component. Computer Engineering and Applications, 46(1): 24-27
  66. 66.
    Liu Y, Goodchild M F, Guo Q H, Tian Y P and Wu L. 2008. Towards a general field model and its order in GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22(6): 623-643
  67. 67.
    Liu Y, Kang C G and Wang F H. 2014. Towards big data-driven human mobility patterns and models. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 39(6): 660-666
  68. 68.
    Liu Y F, Lu B B, Zhang Y B and Liu T. 2009. Modeling the dynamic evolvement of road networks based on object version management methods. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 45(3): 488-494
  69. 69.
    Lu D D. 2015. The value of geographical science and the feelings of geographers. Acta Geographica Sinica, 70(10): 1539-1551
  70. 70.
    Lu Y L, Li J W, Ye S X, Jiang J W, Yin M and Zhou Y L. 2018. Big data organization method of GIS spatio-temporal expanded the streaming data cube. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, (8): 115-118
  71. 71.
    Lü G N. 2011. Geographic analysis-oriented Virtual Geographic Environment: framework, structure and functions. Science China Earth Sciences, 54(5): 733-743
  72. 72.
    Lü G N, Chen M, Yuan L W, Zhou L C, Wen Y N, Wu M G, Hu B, Yu Z Y, Yue S S and Sheng Y H. 2018. Geographic scenario: a possible foundation for further development of virtual geographic environments. International Journal of Digital Earth, 11(4): 356-368
  73. 73.
    Lü G N, Yuan L W and Yu Z Y. 2022. Information geography: a new fulcrum of geographic ternary world. Science China Earth Sciences, 65(2): 383-386
  74. 74.
    Lü G N, Zhou C H, Lin H, Chen M, Yue S S and Wen Y N. 2021. Development overview and some thoughts on geographic synthesis. Chinese Science Bulletin, 66(20): 2542-2554
  75. 75.
    Mei C G, Yu L H, Ni K J, Chen X and Que J J. 2023. Development and application of “four pre” flood control system for Zhougongzhai Reservoir based on digital twin. Water Resources Informatization, 1: 23-28, 32
  76. 76.
    Mishra A K, Kumar P, Dubey A K, Tiwari G and Sein D V. 2022. Impact of air–sea coupling on the simulation of Indian summer monsoon using a high-resolution Regional Earth System Model over CORDEX-SA. Climate Dynamics, 59(9/10): 3013-3033
  77. 77.
    Moore R V and Tindall C I. 2005. An overview of the open modelling interface and environment (the OpenMI). Environmental Science and Policy, 8(3): 279-286
  78. 78.
    Nixon V and Hornsby K S. 2010. Using geolifespans to model dynamic geographic domains. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24(9): 1289-1308
  79. 79.
    Olasz A, Thai B N and Kristóf D. 2016. A new initiative for tiling, stitching and processing geospatial big data in distributed computing environments. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, III-4: 111-118
  80. 80.
    Omrani H, Parmentier B, Helbich M and Pijanowski B. 2019. The land transformation model-cluster framework: applying k-means and the Spark computing environment for large scale land change analytics. Environmental Modelling and Software, 111: 182-191
  81. 81.
    Peckham S D, Hutton E W H and Norris B. 2013. A component-based approach to integrated modeling in the geosciences: the design of CSDMS. Computers and Geosciences, 53: 3-12
  82. 82.
    Pei T, Huang Q, Wang X, Chen X, Liu Y X, Song C, Chen J and Zhou C H. 2021. Big geodata aggregation: connotation, classification, and framework. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 25(11): 2153-2162
  83. 83.
    Qi J H, Chen C S and Beardsley R C. 2018. FVCOM one-way and two-way nesting using ESMF: development and validation. Ocean Modelling, 124: 94-110 [DOI10.1016/j.ocemod.2018.02.007]
  84. 84.
    Rashidi P, Wang T J, Skidmore A, Vrieling A, Darvishzadeh R, Toxopeus B, Ngene S and Omondi P. 2015. Spatial and spatiotemporal clustering methods for detecting elephant poaching hotspots. Ecological Modelling, 297: 180-186 [DOI10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.11.017]
  85. 85.
    Rasp S, Pritchard M S and Gentine P. 2018. Deep learning to represent subgrid processes in climate models. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(39): 9684-9689 [DOI10.1073/pnas.1810286115]
  86. 86.
    Reitsma F and Albrecht J. 2005. Implementing a new data model for simulating processes. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 19(10): 1073-1090 [DOI10.1080/13658810500390943]
  87. 87.
    Rink K, Nixdorf E, Zhou C Z, Hillmann M and Bilke L. 2020. A virtual geographic environment for multi-compartment water and solute dynamics in large catchments. Journal of Hydrology, 582: 124507
  88. 88.
    Roberts J J, Best B D, Dunn D C, Treml E A and Halpin P N. 2010. Marine Geospatial Ecology Tools: an integrated framework for ecological geoprocessing with ArcGIS, Python, R, MATLAB, and C++. Environmental Modelling and Software, 25(10): 1197-1207
  89. 89.
    Roth D, Otterstatter M, Wong J, Cook V, Johnston J and Mak S. 2016. Identification of spatial and cohort clustering of tuberculosis using surveillance data from British Columbia, Canada, 1990-2013. Social Science and Medicine, 168: 214-222
  90. 90.
    Rousseau A N, Mailhot A, Turcotte R, Duchemin M, Blanchette C, Roux M, Etong N, Dupont J and Villeneuve J P, 2000. GIBSI–An integrated modelling system prototype for river basin management. Hydrobiologia, 422(2000): 465-475
  91. 91.
    Running S W and Hunt E R. 1993. Generalization of a forest ecosystem process model for other biomes, BIOME-BGC, and an application for global-scale models//Ehleringer J R and Field C B, eds. Scaling Physiological Processes: Leaf to Globe. San Diego: Academic Press: 141-158
  92. 92.
    Shangguan B Y, Yue P, Yan Z R and Tapete D. 2019. A stream computing approach for live environmental models using a spatial data infrastructure with a waterlogging model case study. Environmental Modelling and Software, 119: 182-196
  93. 93.
    Shi S L, Pang B, Zhao G, Chi K G and Ren M F. 2019. Urban stormwater simulation based on recognition of effective impervious area. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Natural Science), 55(5): 595-602
  94. 94.
    Shrestha N K, Leta O T, De Fraine B, van Griensven A and Bauwens W. 2013. OpenMI-based integrated sediment transport modelling of the river Zenne, Belgium. Environmental Modelling and Software, 47: 193-206
  95. 95.
    Sitch S, Smith B, Prentice I C, Arneth A, Bondeau A, Cramer W, Kaplan J O, Levis S, Lucht W, Sykes M T, Thonicke K and Venevsky S. 2003. Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model. Global Change Biology, 9(2): 161-185
  96. 96.
    Song C Q. 2016. On paradigms of geographical research. Progress in Geography, 35(1): 1-3
  97. 97.
    Song C Q, Cheng C X and Shi P J. 2018. Geography complexity: new connotations of geography in the new era. Acta Geographica Sinica, 73(7): 1204-1213
  98. 98.
    Song C Q, Cheng C X, Yang X F, Ye S J and Gao P C. 2020. Understanding geographic coupling and achieving geographic integration. Acta Geographica Sinica, 75(1): 3-13
  99. 99.
    Song X D, Zhang G L, Liu F, Li D C, Zhao Y G and Yang J L. 2016. Modeling spatio-temporal distribution of soil moisture by deep learning-based cellular automata model. Journal of Arid Land, 8(5): 734-748
  100. 100.
    Song Z Y, Bao Y and Qiao F L. 2022. Global carbon cycle of earth system model FIO-ESM. Advances in Marine Science, 40(4): 777-790
  101. 101.
    Sui D Z and Maggio R C. 1999. Integrating GIS with hydrological modeling: practices, problems, and prospects. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 23(1): 33-51
  102. 102.
    Sun Q and Tang F H. 2015. The comparison of city housing price spatial variances based on spatial expansion and geographical weighted regression models. Geographical Research, 34(7): 1343-1351
  103. 103.
    Swain N R, Christensen S D, Snow A D, Dolder H, Espinoza-Dávalos G, Goharian E, Jones N L, Nelson E J, Ames D P and Burian S J. 2016. A new open source platform for lowering the barrier for environmental web app development. Environmental Modelling and Software, 85: 11-26
  104. 104.
    Tan X C, Jiao J G, Chen N C, Huang F, Di L P, Wang J C, Sha Z Y and Liu J. 2021. Geoscience model service integrated workflow for rainstorm waterlogging analysis. International Journal of Digital Earth, 14(7): 851-873
  105. 105.
    Tan X C, Jiao J G, Zhong Y F, Ma A L, Xu Y Y, Sha Z Y, Huang F, Wan Y T and Hu W Z. 2022. The CNRIEEEMC: a communication-navigation-remote sensing-integrated ecological environment emergency monitoring chain for tailings areas. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 108: 102710
  106. 106.
    Tang L Y, Peng X M, Chen C C, Huang H Y and Lin D. 2019. Three-dimensional Forest growth simulation in virtual geographic environments. Earth Science Informatics, 12(1): 31-41
  107. 107.
    Tao F, Zhang M, Cheng J F and Qi Q L. 2017. Digital twin workshop: a new paradigm for future workshop. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 23(1): 1-9
  108. 108.
    Tarboton D G, Ames D P, Horsburgh J S, Goodall J L, Couch A, Hooper R, Bales J, Wang S, Castronova A, Seul M and Idaszak R. 2023. HydroShare retrospective: Science and technology advances of a comprehensive data and model publication environment for the water science domain. Environmental Modelling & Software, p.105902
  109. 109.
    Tong S L, Wang W G, Chen J, Xu C Y, Sato H and Wang G Q. 2022. Impact of changes in climate and CO2 on the carbon storage potential of vegetation under limited water availability using SEIB-DGVM version 3.02. Geoscientific Model Development, 15(18): 7075-7098
  110. 110.
    Trotter L, Knoben W J M, Fowler K J A, Saft M and Peel M C. 2022. Modular Assessment of Rainfall–Runoff Models Toolbox (MARRMoT) v2.1: an object-oriented implementation of 47 established hydrological models for improved speed and readability. Geoscientific Model Development, 15(16): 6359-6369
  111. 111.
    Tucker G, Lancaster S, Gasparini N and Bras R. 2001. The channel-hillslope integrated landscape development model (CHILD)//Harmon R S and Doe W W, eds. Landscape Erosion and Evolution Modeling. New York: Springer: 349-388
  112. 112.
    Tucker G E and Hancock G R. 2010. Modelling landscape evolution. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 35(1): 28-50
  113. 113.
    Tufa A, Boicu I, Filip I D, Negru C and Pop F. 2018. Remote sensing computing model for forest monitoring in cloud//2018 IEEE 16th International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing (EUC). Bucharest: IEEE: 138-144
  114. 114.
    Voinov A, Çöltekin A, Chen M and Beydoun G. 2018. Virtual geographic environments in socio-environmental modeling: a fancy distraction or a key to communication?. International Journal of Digital Earth, 11(4): 408-419
  115. 115.
    Wang B, Zhang M D, Huang Q J and Yue P. 2021. A container-based service publishing method for heterogeneous geoprocessing operators. Journal of Geomatics, 46(S1): 174-177
  116. 116.
    Wang J F and Xu C D. 2017. Geodetector: principle and prospective. Acta Geographica Sinica, 72(1): 116-134
  117. 117.
    Wang S, Xuan Y Y, Zhang J, Wu H L and Wu P. 2023. The real scene modeling technology application in the power grid digital twinning system. Electric Power Survey and Design, (2): 78-82
  118. 118.
    Wang S H, Zhong Y and Wang E Q. 2019. An integrated GIS platform architecture for spatiotemporal big data. Future Generation Computer Systems, 94: 160-172
  119. 119.
    Wei M Y, Zhang Z D, Liu Y N and Zhang K L. 2020. Characteristics of soil erosion in Guangxi based on CSLE. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 27(1): 15-20
  120. 120.
    Wen Y N, Chen M, Lu G N, Lin H, He L and Yue S S. 2013. Prototyping an open environment for sharing geographical analysis models on cloud computing platform. International Journal of Digital Earth, 6(4): 356-382
  121. 121.
    Wu H Y, You L, Gui Z P, Hu K and Shen P. 2015. GeoSquare: collaborative geoprocessing models’ building, execution and sharing on Azure Cloud. Annals of GIS, 21(4): 287-300
  122. 122.
    Wu L, Ma X J and Tian Y. 2000. Model of field-based spatial dynamic data and design of spatial dynamic modeling language. Geography and Territorial Research, 16(4): 73-76, 96
  123. 123.
    Wu R, Scully-Allison C, Rifat M H, Painumkal J, JrDascalu S and Harris F C. 2018. Virtual watershed system: a web-service-based software package for environmental modeling. Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, 3(5): 382-393
  124. 124.
    Wu Z F, Chai Y W, Dang A R, Gong J H, Gao S, Yue Y, Li D, Liu L, Liu X J, Liu Y, Long Y, Lu F, Qin C Z, Wang H, Wang P, Wang W and Zhen F. 2015. Geography interact with big data: dialogue and reflection. Geographical Research, 34(12): 2207-2221
  125. 125.
    Xiao C W, Zhang M W, Liu H L, Qin B and Huang B. 2022. Analysis of the Metaverse’s spatial restructuring. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 38(2): 1-9
  126. 126.
    Xu B L, Lin H, Zhu J and Deng L H. 2009. Construction of a virtual geographic environment for air pollution simulation in Pearl River Delta. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 34(6): 636-640
  127. 127.
    Xu B L, Rao Y, Chen Y T, You L and Lin H. 2018. Role model-based geo-collaboration of virtual geographic environments. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 43(10): 1580-1587
  128. 128.
    Yan D, Li A N, Nan X, Lei G B and Cao X M. 2016. The study of urban land scenario simulation in mountain area based on modified Dyna-CLUE model and SDM: a case study of the upper reaches of Minjiang River. Journal of Geo-information Science, 18(4): 514-525
  129. 129.
    Yan H W. 2012. Development of Integrated Platform for Refined Marine Meteorological Forecasting Data based on the GFS and WW3 Numerical Forecasting Models. Shanghai:: East China Normal University
  130. 130.
    Yang T and Shan F. 2022. City Information Model (CIM) construction from a complex system perspective. Future City Studies, (10): 8-13
  131. 131.
    Ye Y T, Jiang Y Z, Liang L L, Zhao H L, Gu J J, Dong J P, Cao Y and Duan H. 2022. Digital twin watershed: new infrastructure and new paradigm of future watershed governance and management. Advances in Water Science, 33(5): 683-704
  132. 132.
    Yi J W, Du Y Y, Liang F Y, Zhou C H, Wu D and Mo Y. 2014. A representation framework for studying spatiotemporal changes and interactions of dynamic geographic phenomena. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 28(5): 1010-1027
  133. 133.
    Yin Z C and Li L. 2005. Research of spatiotemporal indexing mechanism based on snapshot-increment. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 34(3): 257-261, 282
  134. 134.
    Yu D Y, Tang L Y, Ye F and Chen C C. 2021. A virtual geographic environment for dynamic simulation and analysis of tailings dam failure. International Journal of Digital Earth, 14(9): 1194-1212
  135. 135.
    Yu H C, Zhang Y J, Nerger L, Lemmen C, Yu J C S, Chou T Y, Chu C H and Terng C T. 2022. Development of a flexible data assimilation method in a 3D unstructured-grid ocean model under Earth System Modeling Framework. EGUsphere, 1-29
  136. 136.
    Zang Z. 2022. Operation and maintenance technology of air-ground integrated “Digital Twins” based on BIM and GIS for intelligent Beijing--Zhangjiakou high speed railway. Railway Transport and Economy, 44(9): 139-145
  137. 137.
    Zeng L, Li J, Li T, Yang X N and Wang Y Z. 2018. Optimizing spatial patterns of water conservation ecosystem service based on Bayesian belief networks. Acta Geographica Sinica, 73(9): 1809-1822
  138. 138.
    Zhao Y B, Nan Z T and Zhao J. 2013. A Decision Support System for Watershed Management Supporting Multidiscipline Model Integration. Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 28(3): 511-519
  139. 139.
    Zhan C S, Ning L K, Zou J, Han J. 2018. A review on the fully coupled atmosphere-hydrology simulations. Acta Geographica Sinica, 73(5): 893-905
  140. 140.
    Zhang B G, Zhu C G and Wang R S. 2005. Improved methods of base state with amendments on spatio-temporal data. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 34(3): 252-256
  141. 141.
    Zhang K R, Yang S P, He L X and Long Y. 2017. Research on emergency evacuation of passengers with luggage from bus station. China Safety Science Journal, 27(1): 30-35
  142. 142.
    Zhang L, Parker G, Stark C P, Inoue T, Viparelli E, Fu X and Izumi N. 2015. Macro-roughness model of bedrock-alluvial river morphodynamics. Earth Surface Dynamics, 3(1): 113-138
  143. 143.
    Zhang M D, Yue P and Gao F. 2018. A geographic model integration approach and implementation based on coupling components and services. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 43(7): 1106-1112
  144. 144.
    Zhang P C, Zhang L and Wang J M. 2017. A model for precipitation forcreasting of mutiple environmental factors based on deep network. Computer Applications and Software, 34(9): 240-245, 261
  145. 145.
    Zhang X C, Liao X and Ruan Y J. 2023. Discussion on digital twin and metaverse in smart city construction. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 1: 1-7, 13
  146. 146.
    Zhao R J. 1992. The Xinanjiang model applied in China. Journal of Hydrology, 135(1/4): 371-381
  147. 147.
    Zhou C H. 2015. Prospects on pan-spatial information system. Progress in Geography, 34(2): 129-131
  148. 148.
    Zhou T J, Yu Y Q, Yu R C, Liu H L, Li W and Zhang X H. 2004. Coupled climate system model coupler review. Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 28(6): 993-1008
  149. 149.
    Zhu A X, Zhu L J, Shi Y X, Qin C Z and Liu J Z. 2019. Integrated watershed modeling and scenario analysis: a new paradigm for integrated study of physical geography?. Progress in Geography, 38(8): 1111-1122
  150. 150.
    Zhu J, Fu L, Li W L, Zheng Q H, Hu Y, Guo Y K, Huang P C and Yang L. 2020. Knowledge-guided dynamic representation method of landslide disaster scene. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 45(8): 1255-1262
  151. 151.
    Zhu L J, Liu J Z, Qin C Z and Zhu A X. 2019. A modular and parallelized watershed modeling framework. Environmental Modelling and Software, 122: 104526
  152. 152.
    Zhu Q, Hu M Y and Huang L H. 2009. Dynamic representation of 3D house properties based on hierarchical events. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 34(3): 326-330
  153. 153.
    Zhu S Y, Yang H W, Yin G P, Chen X and Deng R C. 2023. Research on smart water conservancy framework system based on digital twin. Hydro-Science and Engineering, (3): 68-74
  154. 154.
    Zhu Y L, Feng J, Li Z J, Zhang K, Zuo X and Liu X H. 2022. Building a digital twin Qinhuai River, realizing the “Four Pre” ability of watershed management. Jiangsu Water Resources, (S2): 1-4
  155. 155.
    Zhuang J W, Jacob D J, Gaya J F, Yantosca R M, Lundgren E W, Sulprizio M P and Eastham S D. 2019. Enabling immediate access to earth science models through cloud computing: application to the GEOS-Chem model. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 100(10): 1943-1960

Leer el texto completo

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website