Anterior|Siguiente

Carrying capacity evaluation of Beijing emergency shelters based on AHP-EWM multi-objective decision modeling

  • role： First author第一作者
  • Affiliation：

    Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China

    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

  • Email：youdi@aircas.ac.cn
  • Introduction：尤笛，研究方向为灾害与环境遥感。E-mail： youdi@aircas.ac.cn
YOU Di12,  
  • Affiliation：

    Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China

    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

WANG Shixin12,  
  • role： Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation：

    Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China

    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

  • Email：wangft@aircas.ac.cn
  • Introduction：王福涛，研究方向为重大灾害应急监测、风险评估与海洋可持续发展。E-mail： wangft@aircas.ac.cn
WANG Futao12*,  
  • Affiliation：

    Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China

YAN Jun1,  
  • Affiliation：

    Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China

    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

WANG Zhenqing12,  
  • Affiliation：

    Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China

LIU Wenliang1,  
  • Affiliation：

    Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China

ZHU Jinfeng1,  
  • Affiliation：

    Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China

    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

WANG Litao12,  
  • Affiliation：

    Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China

HOU Yanfeng1

resumen

Emergency shelters can be used for sheltering, rescue, and evacuation of residents after a disaster. These structures are an important part of national public security and emergency management. Evaluating the carrying capacity of emergency shelters is important in promoting the construction of resilient cities and the sustainable development of cities. Beijing is one of only three capital cities in the world that are located in a zone of VIII degree of intensity. It is also the earliest city in China to build emergency shelters, and thus, it is typical and representative in terms of emergency evacuation. In this study, we use remote sensing images, POI, and other multi-source data to construct an evaluation model of the carrying capacity of urban emergency shelters based on multi-objective decision making, and take the Fifth Ring Area of Beijing, where the population distribution is relatively concentrated, as an example.First, according to the principle of establishing evaluation indexes, evaluation indexes are selected from four aspects: safety, accessibility, effectiveness and security, and relevant experts in disaster evaluation are invited to screen out 14 indexes according to their importance and relevance, constituting a system of evaluation indexes for the carrying capacity of emergency shelters.Second, subjective and objective weighting methods are used to determine the weights to make up for the lack of single weights. Subjective assignment adopts Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and objective assignment adopts Entropy Weighting Method (EWM). Commonly used weight combination is the average of subjective and objective weights, while this study adopts maximum sum of squares of deviations theory to solve the optimal weight coefficients of the combination of assignments.Then, based on the multi-objective decision-making model, a 30 m×30 m grid was used as the evaluation unit, and a multi-objective linear weighting method was used to calculate the evaluation scores of the carrying capacity of the emergency shelter. And the natural discontinuity method was used to grade the carrying capacity.Finally, considering the complexity of the disaster after the occurrence of the disaster, including the degree of damage to the building and the potential secondary disaster impact, and referring to the relevant norms and standards, the evacuation scenarios are categorized into short-term evacuation and medium- and long-term evacuation scenarios according to the number of evacuees. The carrying capacity of different evacuation scenarios is simulated and analyzed using the method of this paper.Results show that the carrying capacity of the Fifth Ring Area of Beijing is good, but the carrying capacity of the second and third rings is zero, and an imbalance exists between the rings. This study provides qualitative and quantitative basis for the evaluation of the carrying capacity of urban emergency shelters. It also provides decision support for the planning and layout of emergency shelters and the efficient allocation of resources.

palabra clave

remote sensing;mergency shelter;Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP);Entropy Weighting Method (EWM);combined empowerment;carrying capacity evaluation;multi objective decision making method;scenario simulation;Beijing

References

  1. 1.
    Alawi M, Chu D Z and Hammad S. 2023. Resilience of public open spaces to earthquakes: a case study of Chongqing, China. Sustainability, 15(2): 1092
  2. 2.
    Beatini V, Rajanayagam H and Poologanathan K. 2023. Structural and spatial minimal requirement efficacy of emergency shelters for different emergencies. Buildings, 13(1): 32
  3. 3.
    Bera S, Gnyawali K, Dahal K, Melo R, Miao L J, Guru B, Ramana G V . 2023. Assessment of shelter location-allocation for multi-hazard emergency evacuation. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 84: 103435
  4. 4.
    Chen J, Xia M, Wang D H and Lin H F. 2023. Double branch parallel network for segmentation of buildings and waters in remote sensing images. Remote Sensing, 15(6): 1536
  5. 5.
    Chen Q H. 2014. Land-use suitability evaluation on emergency shelters-A case study of Guangzhou. Territory and Natural Resources Study, (6): 12-17
  6. 6.
    Chu J Y. 2014. Research on the Methods for Planning of Emergency Shelter and its Application. Tianjin: Tianjin University
  7. 7.
    Cui B G, Wu J, Li X H, Ren G B and Lu Y. 2023. Combination of deep learning and vegetation index for coastal wetland mapping using GF-2 remote sensing images. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 27(6): 1376-1386
  8. 8.
    Ding Z and Shen M. 2019. Study on the bearing capacity of geological environment in Huanggang city based on analytic hierarchy process and variation coefficient method. Resources Environment and Engineering, 33(S1): 70-74
  9. 9.
    General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China, Standardization administration. 2008. GB 21734-2008 Emergency shelter for earthquake disasters-site and its facilities. Beijing: Standards Press of China
  10. 10.
    Ji W J, Wang J P, Song S S and Xue M M. 2023. Development planning of urban emergency shelters based on ANP-SWOT model: a case study of Lanzhou City. China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 45(2): 431-440
  11. 11.
    Jiang Z, Qi Z Y and Xiao J N. 2020. Service capacity evaluation and planning response of urban shelters based on multi-source data. Chinese and Overseas Architecture, (1): 53-57
  12. 12.
    Kong Z Q. 2022. Analysis of the Land Use Degree and Ecological Carrying Capacity Study of Zhalong Wetland. Harbin: Harbin Normal University
  13. 13.
    Li P, Ji Y, Wu Z and Qu S J. 2020. A new multi-attribute emergency decision-making algorithm based on intuitionistic fuzzy cross-entropy and comprehensive grey correlation analysis. Entropy, 22(7): 768
  14. 14.
    Li W Q, Sun J Y and Zhou D Y. 2023. Research on safety evaluation of earthquake emergency shelters considering the characteristics of urban parks. South China Journal of Seismology, 43(2): 104-114
  15. 15.
    Liu S L. 2012. Location Selection and Spatial Layout of Urban Emergency Shelters--Taking Nanjing As An Example. Nanjing : Nanjing Normal University
  16. 16.
    Lü W, Li C X and Ma Y P. 2022. Division of responsibility areas for urban emergency shelters based on a GIS location- allocation analysis. J Tsinghua Univ (Sci and Technol), 62(6): 1102-1109
  17. 17.
    Ma Y J, Liu B Y, Zhang K W and Yang Y M. 2022. Incorporating multi-criteria suitability evaluation into multi-objective location–allocation optimization comparison for earthquake emergency shelters. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 13(1): 2333-2355
  18. 18.
    Ma Y J, Xu W and Zhao X J. 2014. Assessment of allocation of residents to emergency shelters under different earthquake damage scenarios--Case study on central area of Beijing. China Safety Science Journal, 24(12): 137-143
  19. 19.
    Ma Z M, Xia M, Weng L G and Lin H F. 2023. Local feature search network for building and water segmentation of remote sensing image. Sustainability, 15(4): 3034
  20. 20.
    Ommi S and Janalipour M. 2022. Selection of shelters after earthquake using probabilistic seismic aftershock hazard analysis and remote sensing. Natural Hazards, 113(1): 345-363
  21. 21.
    Prabhuram T, Rajmohan M, Tan Y C and Johnson R R. 2020. Performance evaluation of Omni channel distribution network configurations using multi criteria decision making techniques. Annals of Operations Research, 288(1): 435-456
  22. 22.
    Rana V K and Suryanarayana T M V. 2020. GIS-based multi criteria decision making method to identify potential runoff storage zones within watershed. Annals of GIS, 26(2): 149-168
  23. 23.
    Şenik B and Uzun O. 2021. An assessment on size and site selection of emergency assembly points and temporary shelter areas in Düzce. Natural Hazards, 105(2): 1587-1602
  24. 24.
    Si Y R, Li J L and Si Y B. 2023. Urban flood loss estimation and evacuation design based on a 500-year extreme flood event in Syracuse city. Water, 15(1): 3
  25. 25.
    Singh P, Sinha V S P, Vijhani A and Pahuja N. 2018. Vulnerability assessment of urban road network from urban flood. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 28: 237-250
  26. 26.
    Su J F and Zhang Q B. 2021. Suitability evaluation of urban earthquake emergency shelter—a case study of the central city of Tianjin. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 16(2): 414-420
  27. 27.
    Tehrani N A, Shafri H Z M, Salehi S, Chanussot J and Janalipour M. 2022. Remotely-Sensed Ecosystem Health Assessment (RSEHA) model for assessing the changes of ecosystem health of Lake Urmia Basin. International Journal of Image and Data Fusion, 13(2): 180-205
  28. 28.
    Trivedi A and Singh A. 2017. Prioritizing emergency shelter areas using hybrid multi-criteria decision approach: a case study. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 24(3/4): 133-145
  29. 29.
    Tsioulou A, Walker J F, Lo D S and Yore R. 2021. A method for determining the suitability of schools as evacuation shelters and aid distribution hubs following disasters: case study from Cagayan de Oro, Philippines. Natural Hazards, 105(2): 1835-1859
  30. 30.
    United Nations. 2015. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development[EB/OL].
  31. 31.
    Wang C Y, Wang L X, Gu T T, Yin J Y and Hao E Y. 2023. CRITIC-TOPSIS-Based evaluation of smart community safety: a case study of Shenzhen, China. Buildings, 13(2): 476
  32. 32.
    Wang L. 2022. Study on Soil Ecological Carrying Capacity of Dry and Barren Mountains in the Yimeng Mountainous Area. Taian: Shandong Agricultural University.
  33. 33.
    Wang X F. 2019. Research on the suitability of the emergency shelter in Tianjin//Proceedings of the 5th Annual International Conference on Social Science and Contemporary Humanity Development (SSCHD 2019). Wuhan: Atlantis Press: 225-230
  34. 34.
    Wang X F. 2019. Research on the suitability of the emergency shelter in Tianjin//Proceedings of the 5th Annual International Conference on Social Science and Contemporary Humanity Development (SSCHD 2019). Wuhan: Atlantis Press: 121-126.
  35. 35.
    Wang X X. 2022. Evaluation and Planning of Geospatial Distribution of Emergency Shelters in Mega Cities. Lianyungang: Jiangsu Ocean University
  36. 36.
    Wang Z Q, Zhou Y, Wang S X, Wang F T and Xu Z Y. 2021. House building extraction from high-resolution remote sensing images based on IEU-Net. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 25(11): 2245-2254
  37. 37.
    Wei B Y, Dong X, Tan Q Q, Qi W H and Guo X X. 2022. Analysis of the earthquake emergency evacuation route based on the capacity of shelters. Journal of Seismological Research, 45(1): 141-149
  38. 38.
    Wei B Y, Tan Q Q and Li X L. 2019. Assessment on spatial distribution and service efficiency of emergency shelters in Beijing. Journal of Seismological Research, 42(2):295-303
  39. 39.
    Xu Z Y, Zhou Y, Wang S X, Wang L T, Li F, Wang S C and Wang Z Q. 2020. A novel intelligent classification method for urban green space based on high-resolution remote sensing images. Remote Sensing, 12(22): 3845
  40. 40.
    Xu Z Y, Zhou Y, Wang S X, Wang L T and Wang Z Q. 2021. U-Net for urban green space classification in Gaofen-2 remote sensing images. Journal of Image and Graphics, 26(3): 700-713
  41. 41.
    Yao Y B, Zhang Y Y, Yao T Y, Wong K, Tsou J Y and Zhang Y Z. 2021. A GIS-based system for spatial-temporal availability evaluation of the open spaces used as emergency shelters: the case of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10(2): 63
  42. 42.
    Yin Y, Zhao X C and Lv W. 2023. Emergency shelter allocation planning technology for large-scale evacuation based on quantum genetic algorithm. Frontiers in Public Health, 10: 1098675
  43. 43.
    You D, Wang S X, Wang F T, Zhou Y, Wang Z Q, Wang Y C, Wang J M, Xiong Y B and Ji J W. 2023. Monitoring and analyzing the effectiveness of the effective refuge area of emergency shelters by using remote sensing: a case study of Beijing’s fifth ring road. Remote Sensing, 15(14): 3646
  44. 44.
    You D, Wang S X, Wang F T, Zhou Y, Wang Z Q, Wang J M and Xiong Y B. 2022. EfficientUNet+: a building extraction method for emergency shelters based on deep learning. Remote Sensing, 14(9): 2207
  45. 45.
    Yu J, Zhang C R, Wen J H, Li W D, Liu R and Xu H. 2018. Integrating multi-agent evacuation simulation and multi-criteria evaluation for spatial allocation of urban emergency shelters. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 32(9): 1884-1910
  46. 46.
    Zabihi H, Alizadeh M, Langat P K, Karami M, Shahabi H, Ahmad A, Said M N and Lee S. 2019. GIS multi-criteria analysis by Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA): toward an integrated citrus management strategy. Sustainability, 11(4): 1009
  47. 47.
    Zhang H B, Zhong F and Shi Y. 2019. Evaluation of carrying capacity of urban emergency shelters based on AHP and GIS: taking Nanjing City as an example. Journal of Institute of Disaster Prevention, 21(3): 39-47
  48. 48.
    Zhang P. 2016. Study of Community Emergency Shelters Carrying Capacity based on the Theory of L-A Model. Beijing: Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture
  49. 49.
    Zhong G C, Lu Y W, Chen W and Zhai G F. 2023. Multi-objective optimization approach of shelter location with maximum equity: an empirical study in Xin Jiekou district of Nanjing, China. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 14(1): 2165973
  50. 50.
    Zhong G C, Zhai G F and Chen W. 2022. Optimization on spatial distribution of shelter through dynamic evacuation simulation of high density urban area-Xinjiekou case. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 16(11): 4760-4776
  51. 51.
    Zhou A H, Chen L, Zhu H Y and Chen S Y. 2021. Reasonability of spatial distribution for urban emergency shelter in central district of Beijing at community scale. Journal of Safety and Environment, 21(4): 1662-1669
  52. 52.
    Zhou Y K, Liu J W and Liang J Z. 2018. Comprehensive suitability evaluation for emergency shelters based on improved gray relational analysis method in Fuzhou. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 34(6): 63-70

Leer el texto completo

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website