Advancements in remote sensing based forest age estimation and its applications

  • role: First author第一作者
  • Affiliation:

    School of Geography, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China

    Key Laboratory of Virtual Geographic Environment (Nanjing Normal University), Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210023, China

    Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Nanjing 210023, China

  • Email:maqin@nnu.edu.cn
  • Introduction:E-mail maqin@nnu.edu.cn
MA Qin123,  
  • Affiliation:

    School of Geography, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China

ZHANG Xu1,  
  • Affiliation:

    School of Geography, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China

YUAN Jingyi1,  
  • Affiliation:

    School of Geography, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China

GONG Zitong1,  
  • Affiliation:

    Key Laboratory of Humid Subtropical Eco-Geographical Process of Ministry of Education, School of Geographical Sciences, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350117, China

SHANG Rong4,  
  • Affiliation:

    Institute of Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

CHENG Kai5,  
  • Affiliation:

    GeoInformatic Unit, Geography Section, School of Humanities, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 USM Pulau Pinang, Malaysia

CHEN Maolong6,  
  • Affiliation:

    Beijing Yuhang Intelligence Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing 100193, China

TAN Qiyun7,  
  • Affiliation:

    International Institute for Earth System Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China

JU Weimin8

resumen

Forest age is a critical parameter determining forest carbon sequestration capacity and its temporal trends. Quantifying spatiotemporal variations in forest age is essential for predicting forest ecosystem carbon dynamics. While traditional forest age assessments were limited to forest plots, the development of remote sensing technology has expanded the estimation from plots to regional and global scales. Research related to forest age has gaining increasing attention across fields of forestry, ecology, and geography, etc. This article aims to review the process in forest age estimation by summarizing the main methods and their applications from related literatures and datasets published since the year of 2000.Remote sensing-based approaches fall into three main categories: 1. regression from image spectral and texture features, 2. time series change detection, and 3. tree height or biomass growth equation modeling. 1.The spectral image regression method is straightforward but often has limited regression accuracy due to the saturation effect in the spectral image information-forest age relationship. 2. The time series change detection method can achieve high accuracy but only applicable to forests with continuous remote sensing observations. 3. The tree height or biomass growth equations based strategy can broaden the limits of forest age estimation, but its estimation accuracy is sensitive to the selections of model equation and input parameters. Consequently, integrating multisource datasets and combining multiple modeling approaches have become the predominant strategy for forest age estimation. This strategy has been successfully implemented in high-resolution forest age mapping at national scales across China and Canada.The advancement of remote sensing technology has substantially improved the efficiency and accuracy of forest age estimation, extending its applicability from individual plots to regional and global scales. Large-scale forest age data have great potential for applications in forest carbon cycle modeling, biodiversity assessment, and forest management. Future research should focus on improving and updating forest measurement datasets, fully leveraging multisource and multispatial-temporal remote sensing information, and enhancing the transferability and generality of estimation models.

palabra clave

remote sensing;forest age;tree height;above ground biomass;carbon cycle;change detection;tree growth equation;forest management;biodiversity

References

  1. 1.
    Alvarez-González J G, Zingg A, Gadow K 2010. Estimating growth in beech forests: a study based on long term experiments in Switzerland. Annals of Forest Science, 67
  2. 2.
    Amiro B D, Chen J M 2003. Forest-fire-scar aging using SPOT-VEGETATION for Canadian ecoregions. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 33, 1116-1125
  3. 3.
    Besnard S, Koirala S, Santoro M, Weber U, Nelson J, Gütter J, Herault B, Kassi J, N'guessan A, Neigh C, Poulter B, Zhang T, Carvalhais N 2021. Mapping global forest age from forest inventories, biomass and climate data. Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 4881-4896
  4. 4.
    Carey E V, Sala A, Keane R, Callaway R M 2001. Are old forests underestimated as global carbon sinks? Global Change Biology, 7, 339-344
  5. 5.
    Chen B, Cao J, Wang J, Wu Z, Tao Z, Chen J, Yang C, Xie G 2012. Estimation of rubber stand age in typhoon and chilling injury afflicted area with Landsat TM data: a case study in Hainan Island, China. Forest Ecology and Management, 274, 222-230
  6. 6.
    Chen B, Jin Y, Brown P 2019. Automatic mapping of planting year for tree crops with Landsat satellite time series stacks. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 151, 176-188
  7. 7.
    Cheng K, Chen Y, Xiang T, Yang H, Liu W, Ren Y, Guan H, Hu T, Ma Q, Guo Q 2024. A 2020 forest age map for China with 30 m resolution. Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 803-819
  8. 8.
    Cieszewski C J, Strub M, Zasada M 2007. New dynamic site equation that fits best the Schwappach data for Scots pine ( L.) in Central Europe. Forest Ecology and Management, 243, 83-93
  9. 9.
    Dai M, Zhou T, Yang L L and Jia G S. 2011.Spatial pattern of forest ages in China retrieved from nationa-l level inventory and remote sensing imageries. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 30(1):172-184
  10. 10.
    Du Y C, Li M Z, Fan W Y and Wang B. 2019. Estimation of Forest Stand Age Based on GWR Model and Forest Fire Remote Sensing Data. SCIENTIA SILVAE SINICAE, 55 (6):184-94
  11. 11.
    Dengqiu L, Weimin J, Wenyi F, Zhujun G 2014. Estimating the age of deciduous forests in northeast China with Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus data acquired in different phenological seasons. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 8, 083670
  12. 12.
    Diao J, Feng T, Li M, Zhu Z, Liu J, Biging G, Zheng G, Shen W, Wang H, Wang J, Ji B 2020. Use of vegetation change tracker, spatial analysis, and random forest regression to assess the evolution of plantation stand age in Southeast China. Annals of Forest Science, 77, 27
  13. 13.
    Du Z, Yu L, Yang J, Xu Y, Chen B, Peng S, Zhang T, Fu H, Harris N, Gong P 2022. A global map of planting years of plantations. Scientific Data, 9, 141
  14. 14.
    Duane M V, Cohen W B, Campbell J L, Hudiburg T, Turner D P, Weyermann D L 2010. Implications of Alternative Field-Sampling Designs on Landsat-Based Mapping of Stand Age and Carbon Stocks in Oregon Forests. Forest Science, 56, 405-416
  15. 15.
    Fang J Y. 2021. Ecological perspectives of carbon neutrality. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 45 (11):1173-6.
  16. 16.
    Fang J Y, Chen A P, Zhao S Q and CI L J. 2002. ESTIMATING BIOMASS CARBON OF CHINA’S FORESTS: SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES ON REPORT PUBLISHED IN SCIENCE (291:2320-2322BY FANGet al).2001. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 26(2):243
  17. 17.
    Frate L, Carranza M L, Garfì V, Febbraro M D, Tonti D, Marchetti M, Ottaviano M, Santopuoli G, Chirici G 2015. Spatially explicit estimation of forest age by integrating remotely sensed data and inverse yield modeling techniques. iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, 9, 63-71
  18. 18.
    George-Chacón S P, Mas J F, Dupuy J M, Castillo-Santiago M A, Hernández-Stefanoni J L 2022. Mapping the spatial distribution of stand age and aboveground biomass from Landsat time series analyses of forest cover loss in tropical dry forests. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation, 8, 347-361
  19. 19.
    Guerrero-Ramírez N R 2021. Functional forest restoration. NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 5, 1572-1573
  20. 20.
    Hilmers T, Friess N, Bässler C, Heurich M, Brandl R, Pretzsch H, Seidl R, Müller J 2018. Biodiversity along temperate forest succession. Journal of Applied Ecology, 55, 2756-2766
  21. 21.
    Honnay O, Hermy M, Coppin P 1999. Effects of area, age and diversity of forest patches in Belgium on plant species richness, and implications for conservation and reforestation. Biological Conservation, 87, 73-84
  22. 22.
    Huang C, Goward S N, Masek J G, Thomas N, Zhu Z, Vogelmann J E 2010. An automated approach for reconstructing recent forest disturbance history using dense Landsat time series stacks. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114, 183-198
  23. 23.
    Huang T H, Huang C L, Lin Y C, Sun I F 2022. Seedling survival simultaneously determined by conspecific, heterospecific, and phylogenetically related neighbors and habitat heterogeneity in a subtropical forest in Taiwan. ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 12
  24. 24.
    Kayitakire F, Hamel C, Defourny P 2006. Retrieving forest structure variables based on image texture analysis and IKONOS-2 imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 102, 390-401
  25. 25.
    Li F, Li M, Shi Z L, Jiang H Y and An J P. 2018. Estimates Stand Age Distribution Based on Forest Survey and Remote Sensing data. FOREST ENGINEERING, 34 (2):30-34
  26. 26.
    Li Y,Zhou X C,Chen Y Z and Wang F K. 2022. Estimation and Evaluation of Forest Age in Jiangle County,Fujian Province based on Lansat Time Series Remote Sensing Disturbance Detection.Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 37(3):651-662
  27. 27.
    Li X, Ramos Aguila L C, Wu D, Lie Z, Xu W, Tang X, Liu J 2023. Carbon sequestration and storage capacity of Chinese fir at different stand ages. Science of the Total Environment, 904, 166962
  28. 28.
    Lin X, Shang R, Chen J M, Zhao G, Zhang X, Huang Y, Yu G, He N, Xu L, Jiao W 2023. High-resolution forest age mapping based on forest height maps derived from GEDI and ICESat-2 space-borne lidar data. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 339, 109592
  29. 29.
    Liu X, Su Y, Hu T, Yang Q, Liu B, Deng Y, Tang H, Tang Z, Fang J, Guo Q 2022. Neural network guided interpolation for mapping canopy height of China's forests by integrating GEDI and ICESat-2 data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 269, 112844
  30. 30.
    Lu H C, Mohren G M J, Del Río M, Schelhaas M J, Bouwman M, Sterck F J 2018. Species Mixing Effects on Forest Productivity: A Case Study at Stand-, Species- and Tree-Level in the Netherlands. FORESTS, 9
  31. 31.
    Lucas R M, Honzák M, Curran P J, Foody G M, Milne R, Brown T, Amaral S 2000. Mapping the regional extent of tropical forest regeneration stages in the Brazilian Legal Amazon using NOAA AVHRR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21, 2855-2881
  32. 32.
    Ma Q, Lin J, Ju Y, Li W, Liang L, Guo Q 2023. Individual structure mapping over six million trees for New York City USA. Scientific Data, 10, 102
  33. 33.
    Maltamo M, Kinnunen H, Kangas A, Korhonen L 2020. Predicting stand age in managed forests using National Forest Inventory field data and airborne laser scanning. Forest Ecosystems, 7, 44
  34. 34.
    Maltman J C, Hermosilla T, Wulder M A, Coops N C, White J C 2023. Estimating and mapping forest age across Canada's forested ecosystems. Remote Sensing of Environment, 290, 113529
  35. 35.
    Nelson R F, Kimes D S, Salas W A, Routhier M 2000. Secondary Forest Age and Tropical Forest Biomass Estimation Using Thematic Mapper Imagery: Single-year tropical forest age classes, a surrogate for standing biomass, cannot be reliably identified using single-date tm imagery. BioScience, 50, 419-431 [DOI: [0419:SFAATF]2.0.CO;2]
  36. 36.
    Pan Y, Birdsey R A, Fang J, Houghton R, Kauppi P E, Kurz W A, Phillips O L, Shvidenko A, Lewis S L, Canadell J G 2011a. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. science, 333, 988-993
  37. 37.
    Pan Y, Chen J M, Birdsey R, Mccullough K, He L, Deng F 2011b. Age structure and disturbance legacy of North American forests. Biogeosciences, 8, 715-732
  38. 38.
    Pan Y D, Mccullough K, Hollinger D Y 2018. Forest biodiversity, relationships to structural and functional attributes, and stability in New England forests. Forest Ecosystems, 5
  39. 39.
    Peng D, Zhang H, Liu L, Huang W, Huete A R, Zhang X, Wang F, Yu L, Xie Q, Wang C, Luo S, Li C, Zhang B 2019. Estimating the Aboveground Biomass for Planted Forests Based on Stand Age and Environmental Variables. Remote Sensing, 11, 2270
  40. 40.
    Pugh T a M, Lindeskog M, Smith B, Poulter B, Arneth A, Haverd V, Calle L 2019. Role of forest regrowth in global carbon sink dynamics. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 116, 4382-4387
  41. 41.
    Reyes-Palomeque G, Dupuy J M, Portillo-Quintero C A, Andrade J L, Tun-Dzul F J, Hernández-Stefanoni J L 2021. Mapping forest age and characterizing vegetation structure and species composition in tropical dry forests. Ecological Indicators, 120, 106955
  42. 42.
    Sanchez Lopez N 2019. Reconstruction of the Stand-level Disturbance History of a Temperate Coniferous Forest Using LiDAR data and Geographic Object-based Image Analysis (GEOBIA). In (p. 151). United States -- Idaho: University of Idaho.
  43. 43.
    Savilaakso S, Johansson A, Häkkilä M, Uusitalo A, Sandgren T, Mönkkönen M, Puttonen P 2021. What are the effects of even-aged and uneven-aged forest management on boreal forest biodiversity in Fennoscandia and European Russia? A systematic review. Environmental Evidence, 10, 1
  44. 44.
    Schumacher J, Hauglin M, Astrup R, Breidenbach J 2020. Mapping forest age using National Forest Inventory, airborne laser scanning, and Sentinel-2 data. Forest Ecosystems, 7, 60
  45. 45.
    Shang R, Chen J M, Xu M, Lin X, Li P, Yu G, He N, Xu L, Gong P, Liu L, Liu H, Jiao W 2023. China’s current forest age structure will lead to weakened carbon sinks in the near future. The Innovation, 4
  46. 46.
    Shen W J, Li M S and Huang C Q. 2018. Review of remote sensing algorithms for monitoring forest disturbance from time series and multi-source data fusion. Journal of Remote Sensing (in Chinese), 22(6): 1005-1022
  47. 47.
    Sun C, Cao S, Sanchez-Azofeifa G A 2019. Mapping tropical dry forest age using airborne waveform LiDAR and hyperspectral metrics. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 83, 101908
  48. 48.
    Sun X Y, Wang G X, Huang M, Chang R Y, Ran F 2016. Forest biomass carbon stocks and variation in Tibet's carbon-dense forests from 2001 to 2050. Scientific Reports, 6
  49. 49.
    Tang S F,Tian Q J,Xu K J,Xu N X and Yue J B. 2020. Age information retrieval of Larix gmelinii forest using Sentinel-2 data. Journal of Remote Sensing (in Chinese),24(12):1511-1524
  50. 50.
    Vega C, St-Onge B 2009. Mapping site index and age by linking a time series of canopy height models with growth curves. Forest Ecology and Management, 257, 951-959
  51. 51.
    Vilén T, Gunia K, Verkerk P J, Seidl R, Schelhaas M J, Lindner M, Bellassen V 2012. Reconstructed forest age structure in Europe 1950-2010. Forest Ecology and Management, 286, 203-218
  52. 52.
    Wang W T. 2018. Carbon Storage in Chinese Forest Ecosystems: Dynamics and Mechanisms. Beijing :Science Press
  53. 53.
    Wu L, Liu X N, Liu M, Zhang T W, Yang B W, Xu Y Q. 2024. Review of the detection and attribution of multi-type forest disturbances using an ensemble of spatio-temporal-spectral information from remote sensing images.Journal of Remote Sensing (in Chinese), 28(3): 558-575
  54. 54.
    Wylie R R M, Woods M E, Dech J P 2019. Estimating Stand Age from Airborne Laser Scanning Data to Improve Models of Black Spruce Wood Density in the Boreal Forest of Ontario. In, Remote Sensing
  55. 55.
    Xiao Y, Wang Q, Tong X, Atkinson P M 2023. Thirty-meter map of young forest age in China. Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 3365-3386
  56. 56.
    Xu C, Manley B, Morgenroth J 2018. Evaluation of modelling approaches in predicting forest volume and stand age for small-scale plantation forests in New Zealand with RapidEye and LiDAR. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 73, 386-396
  57. 57.
    Xu H, Yue C, Zhang Y, Liu D, Piao S 2023. Forestation at the right time with the right species can generate persistent carbon benefits in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120, e2304988120
  58. 58.
    Yang H, Ciais P, Frappart F, Li X, Brandt M, Fensholt R, Fan L, Saatchi S, Besnard S, Deng Z, Bowring S, Wigneron J-P 2023a. Global increase in biomass carbon stock dominated by growth of northern young forests over past decade. Nature Geoscience, 16, 886-892
  59. 59.
    Yang Q, Niu C, Liu X, Feng Y, Ma Q, Wang X, Tang H, Guo Q 2023b. Mapping high-resolution forest aboveground biomass of China using multisource remote sensing data. GIScience & Remote Sensing, 60, 2203303
  60. 60.
    Yao Y T, Piao S L, Wang T 2018. Future biomass carbon sequestration capacity of Chinese forests. Science Bulletin, 63, 1108-1117
  61. 61.
    Yu Z, Zhao H, Liu S, Zhou G, Fang J, Yu G, Tang X, Wang W, Yan J, Wang G 2020. Mapping forest type and age in China’s plantations. Science of the Total Environment, 744, 140790
  62. 62.
    Zhang C, Ju W, Chen J M, Li D, Wang X, Fan W, Li M, Zan M 2014. Mapping forest stand age in China using remotely sensed forest height and observation data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 119, 1163-1179
  63. 63.
    Zhang W Q, Fang L, Yang J, Zhang W D, Yan Y and Yan Q L. 2018. Reconstruction of stand-replacement disturbance and stand age of Chinese fir plantation based on a Landsat time series in Huitong County,Hunan. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 37 (11):3467-3479
  64. 64.
    Zhang Y, Yao Y T, Wang X H, Liu Y W, Piao S L 2017. Mapping spatial distribution of forest age in China. Earth and Space Science, 4, 108-116
  65. 65.
    Zhao G, Sanchez-Azofeifa A, Laakso K, Sun C, Fei L 2021. Hyperspectral and Full-Waveform LiDAR Improve Mapping of Tropical Dry Forest’s Successional Stages. In, Remote Sensing
  66. 66.
    Zheng G, Tian Q J, Chen J M, Ju W M, Xia X Q. 2006.Combining Remote Sensing Imagery and Forest Age Inventory for Biomass Mapping. Journal of Remote Sensing (in Chinese), 10(6):932-940
  67. 67.
    Zhu K, Song Y L, Qin C 2019. Forest age improves understanding of the global carbon sink. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 116, 3962-3964
  68. 68.
    Zhu K, Zhang J, Niu S L, Chu C J, Luo Y Q 2018. Limits to growth of forest biomass carbon sink under climate change. Nature Communications, 9
  69. 69.
    Zhu Z, Zhang J, Yang Z, Aljaddani A H, Cohen W B, Qiu S, Zhou C 2020. Continuous monitoring of land disturbance based on Landsat time series. Remote Sensing of Environment, 238, 111116
  70. 70.
    Zhou L, Wang S Q, Zhou T, Chi Y G and Dai M. Carbon dynamics of China’s forests during 1901—2010: The importance of forest age. 2016. Chin Sci Bull, 61: 2064-2073

Leer el texto completo

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website