Anterior|Siguiente

Análisis meta de la investigación sobre la corrección topográfica de imágenes de teledetección óptica

  • role： First author第一作者
  • Affiliation：

    Faculty of Geosciences and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China

  • Email：chenrui960301@my.swjtu.edu.cn
  • Introduction：陈瑞，研究方向为山地植被遥感。E-mail： chenrui960301@my.swjtu.edu.cn
CHEN Rui1,  
  • role： Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation：

    Faculty of Geosciences and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China

  • Email：yingf@swjtu.edu.cn
  • Introduction：尹高飞，研究方向为山地生态遥感、交通遥感。E-mail： yingf@swjtu.edu.cn
YIN Gaofei1*,  
  • Affiliation：

    Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China

ZHAO Wei2,  
  • Affiliation：

    Faculty of Geosciences and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China

YU Huinan1,  
  • Affiliation：

    Faculty of Geosciences and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China

LIU Guoxiang1

resumen

El terreno accidentado provoca distorsiones en las imágenes de teledetección óptica, lo que afecta a su vez la clasificación de la cobertura terrestre en zonas montañosas y la precisión en la inversión de parámetros biofísicos. Por lo tanto, la corrección topográfica es un requisito previo para las aplicaciones de teledetección en zonas montañosas. Desde la década de 1980, investigadores nacionales e internacionales han trabajado en cómo obtener con precisión la reflectancia de la superficie en zonas montañosas y han desarrollado varios métodos de corrección topográfica para mitigar los efectos del terreno en las imágenes de teledetección. Aunque existan estudios que comparan métodos de corrección topográfica, la mayoría se limitan a imágenes específicas y a pocos criterios de evaluación, lo que lleva a conclusiones insuficientes e inconsistentes. Actualmente, falta una revisión sistemática de los estudios relacionados con la corrección topográfica, lo que limita la comprensión integral del estado actual de la investigación. Este artículo comienza analizando las vías clave por las que el terreno afecta el proceso de imagen óptica, describiendo sistemáticamente el mecanismo de generación del efecto del terreno; a continuación, se presentan los principios básicos de los métodos comunes de corrección topográfica; luego, basándose en los datos de literatura de WoS (Web of Science/Scopus) y CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) desde 1980 hasta 2022 relacionados con la corrección topográfica en teledetección óptica, se extraen diversos tipos de información de cada estudio y se realiza un análisis meta de la cantidad de publicaciones, palabras clave y las diferentes etapas de la investigación en corrección topográfica (imágenes satelitales, modelos digitales de elevación, métodos de corrección y criterios de evaluación); finalmente, se discuten las cuestiones científicas clave de la corrección topográfica y se plantean las principales direcciones futuras en su desarrollo. Los resultados del estudio muestran cuantitativamente la evolución y los temas de interés en la corrección topográfica en teledetección óptica, proporcionando una referencia para la optimización futura de los métodos de corrección topográfica.

palabra clave

teledetección;corrección topográfica;zona montañosa;análisis meta;procesamiento de imágenes

References

  1. 1.
    Adhikari H, Heiskanen J, Maeda E E and Pellikka P K E. 2016. The effect of topographic normalization on fractional tree cover mapping in tropical mountains: an assessment based on seasonal Landsat time series. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 52: 20-31
  2. 2.
    Betthäuser B A, Bach-Mortensen A M and Engzell P. 2023. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence on learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(3): 375-385
  3. 3.
    Chi H J, Yan K, Yang K, Du S Y, Li H L, Qi J B and Zhou W. 2022. Evaluation of topographic correction models based on 3-D radiative transfer simulation. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 19: 1-5
  4. 4.
    Dash J and Ogutu B O. 2016. Recent advances in space-borne optical remote sensing systems for monitoring global terrestrial ecosystems. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 40(2): 322-351
  5. 5.
    Ding Y F, You H J, Zang H, Chen S J, Xu B and Sun T. 2018. Topographic correction method for high-resolution remote sensing images. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 44(1): 27-35
  6. 6.
    Duan S B and Yan G J. 2007. A review of models for topographic correction of remotely sensed images in mountainous area. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Natural Science), 43(3): 362-366
  7. 7.
    Dymond J R and Shepherd J D. 1999. Correction of the topographic effect in remote sensing. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 37(5): 2618-2619
  8. 8.
    Egger M, Smith G D and Phillips A N. 1997. Meta-analysis: principles and procedures. BMJ, 315(7121): 1533-1537
  9. 9.
    Ekstrand S. 1996. Landsat TM-based forest damage assessment: correction for topographic effects. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 62(2): 151-161
  10. 10.
    Fan W L, Chen J M, Ju W M and Zhu G L. 2014a. GOST: a geometric-optical model for sloping terrains. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 52(9): 5469-5482
  11. 11.
    Fan W L, Li J, Liu Q H, Zhang Q, Yin G F, Li A N, Zeng Y L, Xu B D, Xu X J, Zhou G M and Du H Q. 2018. Topographic correction of forest image data based on the canopy reflectance model for sloping terrains in multiple forward mode. Remote Sensing, 10(5): 717
  12. 12.
    Fan Y C, Koukal T and Weisberg P J. 2014b. A sun-crown-sensor model and adapted C-correction logic for topographic correction of high resolution forest imagery. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 96: 94-105
  13. 13.
    Feng R T, Du Q Y, Luo H, Shen H F, Li X H and Liu B. 2021. A registration algorithm based on optical flow modification for multi-temporal remote sensing images covering the complex-terrain region. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 25(2): 630-640
  14. 14.
    Field A P and Gillett R. 2010. How to do a meta‐analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 63(3): 665-694
  15. 15.
    Ganguly S, Nemani R R, Zhang G, Hashimoto H, Milesi C, Michaelis A, Wang W L, Votava P, Samanta A, Melton F, Dungan J L, Vermote E, Gao F, Knyazikhin Y and Myneni R B. 2012. Generating global Leaf Area Index from Landsat: algorithm formulation and demonstration. Remote Sensing of Environment, 122: 185-202
  16. 16.
    Gao Y N and Zhang W C. 2008. Comparison test and research progress of topographic correction on remotely sensed data. Geographical Research, 27(2): 467-477
  17. 17.
    Gao Y N and Zhang W C. 2009. A simple empirical topographic correction method for ETM+ imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 30(9): 2259-2275
  18. 18.
    Gu D G and Gillespie A. 1998. Topographic normalization of landsat TM images of forest based on subpixel sun-canopy-sensor geometry. Remote Sensing of Environment, 64(2): 166-175
  19. 19.
    Hantson S and Chuvieco E. 2011. Evaluation of different topographic correction methods for Landsat imagery. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 13(5): 691-700
  20. 20.
    Holben B N and Justice C O. 1980. The topographic effect on spectral response from nadir-pointing sensors. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 46(9): 1191-1200
  21. 21.
    Huang J L, Ju W M, Zheng G and Kang T T. 2013. Estimation of forest aboveground biomass using high spatial resolution remote sensing imagery. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33(20): 6497-6508
  22. 22.
    Hurni K, van den Hoek J and Fox J. 2019. Assessing the spatial, spectral, and temporal consistency of topographically corrected Landsat time series composites across the mountainous forests of Nepal. Remote Sensing of Environment, 231: 111225
  23. 23.
    Immerzeel W W, Lutz A F, Andrade M, Bahl A, Biemans H, Bolch T, Hyde S, Brumby S, Davies B J, Elmore A C, Emmer A, Feng M, Fernández A, Haritashya U, Kargel J S, Koppes M, Kraaijenbrink P D A, Kulkarni A V, Mayewski P A, Nepal S, Pacheco P, Painter T H, Pellicciotti F, Rajaram H, Rupper S, Sinisalo A, Shrestha A B, Viviroli D, Wada Y, Xiao C, Yao T and Baillie J E M. 2020. Importance and vulnerability of the world’s water towers. Nature, 577(7790): 364-369
  24. 24.
    Jin H A, Li A N, Xu W X, Xiao Z Q, Jiang J Y and Xue H Z. 2019. Evaluation of topographic effects on multiscale leaf area index estimation using remotely sensed observations from multiple sensors. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 154: 176-188
  25. 25.
    Kobayashi S and Sanga-Ngoie K. 2008. The integrated radiometric correction of optical remote sensing imageries. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(20): 5957-5985
  26. 26.
    Li F, Jupp D L B and Thankappan M. 2011. Using high resolution DSM data to correct the terrain illumination effect in Landsat data//Proceedings of the 19th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation. Perth: [s.n.]: 2402-2408
  27. 27.
    Li F Q, Jupp D L B, Thankappan M, Lymburner L, Mueller N, Lewis A and Held A. 2012. A physics-based atmospheric and BRDF correction for Landsat data over mountainous terrain. Remote Sensing of Environment, 124: 756-770
  28. 28.
    Li L, Liu Y, Zhu H H, Ying S, Luo Q Y, Luo H, Kuai X, Xia H and Shen H. 2017. A bibliometric and visual analysis of global geo-ontology research. Computers and Geosciences, 99: 1-8
  29. 29.
    Li T, Chen T Y and Hui B H. 2022. Economic value of forest ecosystem services in Huangshan City based on meta-analysis. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 42(12): 2179-2188
  30. 30.
    Li W J, Dong R M, Fu H H, Wang J, Yu L and Gong P. 2020. Integrating Google Earth imagery with Landsat data to improve 30-m resolution land cover mapping. Remote Sensing of Environment, 237: 111563
  31. 31.
    Lin X W, Wen J G, Wu S B, Hao D L, Xiao Q and Liu Q H. 2020. Advances in topographic correction methods for optical remote sensing imageries. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 24(8): 958-974
  32. 32.
    Luisa E M, Frédéric Baret and Marie W. 2008. Slope correction for LAI estimation from gap fraction measurements. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 148(10): 1553-1562
  33. 33.
    Ma L, Liu Y, Zhang X L, Ye Y X, Yin G F and Johnson B A. 2019. Deep learning in remote sensing applications: a meta-analysis and review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 152: 166-177
  34. 34.
    Messerli B, Viviroli D and Weingartner R. 2004. Mountains of the world: water towers for the 21st century. Ambio, 13: 29-34
  35. 35.
    Meybeck M, Green P and Vörösmarty C. 2001. A new typology for mountains and other relief classes. Mountain Research and Development, 21(1): 34-45 [DOI: [0034:ANTFMA]2.0.CO;2]
  36. 36.
    Myneni R B, Hoffman S, Knyazikhin Y, Privette J L, Glassy J, Tian Y, Wang Y, Song X, Zhang Y, Smith G R, Lotsch A, Friedl M, Morisette J T, Votava P, Nemani R R and Running S W. 2002. Global products of vegetation leaf area and fraction absorbed PAR from year one of MODIS data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83(1/2): 214-231
  37. 37.
    Nichol J, Hang L K and Sing W M. 2006. Empirical correction of low Sun angle images in steeply sloping terrain: a slope-matching technique. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27(3): 629-635
  38. 38.
    Pepin N, Bradley R S, Diaz H F, Baraer M, Caceres E B, Forsythe N, Fowler H, Greenwood G, Hashmi M Z, Liu X D, Miller J R, Ning L, Ohmura A, Palazzi E, Rangwala I, Schöner W, Severskiy I, Shahgedanova M, Wang M B, Williamson S N and Yang D Q. 2015. Elevation-dependent warming in mountain regions of the world. Nature Climate Change, 5: 424-430
  39. 39.
    Proy C, Tanré D and Deschamps P Y. 1989. Evaluation of topographic effects in remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 30(1): 21-32
  40. 40.
    Rahbek C, Borregaard M K, Colwell R K, Dalsgaard Bo, Holt B G, Morueta-Holme N, Nogues-Bravo D, Whittaker R J and Fjeldså J. 2019. Humboldt’s enigma: what causes global patterns of mountain biodiversity? Science, 365(6458): 1108-1113
  41. 41.
    Reese H and Olsson H. 2011. C-correction of optical satellite data over alpine vegetation areas: a comparison of sampling strategies for determining the empirical c-parameter. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115(6): 1387-1400
  42. 42.
    Schaaf C B, Li X W and Strahler A H. 1994. Topographic effects on bidirectional and hemispherical reflectances calculated with a geometric-optical canopy model. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 32(6): 1186-1193
  43. 43.
    Schleppi P, Conedera M, Sedivy I and Thimonier A. 2007. Correcting non-linearity and slope effects in the estimation of the leaf area index of forests from hemispherical photographs. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 144(3/4): 236-242
  44. 44.
    Shen H F and Zhang L P. 2023. Mechanism-learning coupling paradigms for parameter inversion and simulation in earth surface systems. Science China Earth Sciences, 66(3): 568-582
  45. 45.
    Smith J A,Lin T L and Ranson K J. 1980. The lambertian assumption and Landsat data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 46(9): 1183-1189
  46. 46.
    Soenen S A, Peddle D R and Coburn C A. 2005. SCS+C: a modified Sun-canopy-sensor topographic correction in forested terrain. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 43(9): 2148-2159
  47. 47.
    Soenen S A, Peddle D R, Coburn C A, Hall R J and Hall F G. 2008. Improved topographic correction of forest image data using a 3‐D canopy reflectance model in multiple forward mode. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(4): 1007-1027
  48. 48.
    Sola I, González-Audícana M and Álvarez-Mozos J. 2016. Multi-criteria evaluation of topographic correction methods. Remote Sensing of Environment, 184: 247-262
  49. 49.
    Sola I, González-Audícana M, Álvarez-Mozos J and Torres J L. 2014. Synthetic images for evaluating topographic correction algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 52(3): 1799-1810
  50. 50.
    Teillet P M, Guindon B and Goodenough D G. 1982. On the slope-aspect correction of multispectral scanner data. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 8(2): 84-106
  51. 51.
    Vögtli M, Schläpfer D, Richter R, Hueni A, Schaepman M E and Kneubühler M. 2021. About the transferability of topographic correction methods from spaceborne to airborne optical data. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 14: 1348-1362
  52. 52.
    Wang S N and Li A N. 2012. The progress in the study of topographic radiometric correction models. Remote Sensing for Land and Resources, (2): 1-6
  53. 53.
    Wen J G. 2008. Study on retrieval of land surface BRDF/albedo and its scale effects in complex terrain. Beijing: Institute of Remote Sensing Applications, Chinese Academy of Sciences
  54. 54.
    Wen J G, Liu Q, Tang Y, Dou B C, You D Q, Xiao Q, Liu Q H and Li X W. 2015. Modeling land surface reflectance coupled BRDF for HJ-1/CCD data of rugged terrain in Heihe River Basin, China. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 8(4): 1506-1518
  55. 55.
    Wen J G, Liu Q, Xiao Q, Liu Q H, You D Q, Hao D L, Wu S B and Lin X W. 2018. Characterizing land surface anisotropic reflectance over rugged terrain: a review of concepts and recent developments. Remote Sensing, 10(3): 370
  56. 56.
    Wen J G, Liu Q H, Liu Q, Xiao Q and Li X W. 2009. Parametrized BRDF for atmospheric and topographic correction and albedo estimation in Jiangxi rugged terrain, China. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 30(11): 2875-2896
  57. 57.
    Xiao J F, Chevallier F, Gomez C, Guanter L, Hicke J A, Huete A R, Ichii K, Ni W J, Pang Y, Rahman A F, Sun G Q, Yuan W P, Zhang L and Zhang X Y. 2019. Remote sensing of the terrestrial carbon cycle: a review of advances over 50 years. Remote Sensing of Environment, 233: 111383
  58. 58.
    Xie J L, Wang C J, Ma D J, Chen R, Xie Q Y, Xu B D, Zhao W and Yin G F. 2022. Generating spatiotemporally continuous grassland aboveground biomass on the Tibetan Plateau through PROSAIL model inversion on Google Earth Engine. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 60: 1-10
  59. 59.
    Yin G F, Cao B, Li J, Fan W L, Zeng Y L, Xu B D and Zhao W. 2020. Path length correction for improving leaf area index measurements over sloping terrains: a deep analysis through computer simulation. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 58(7): 4573-4589
  60. 60.
    Yin G F, Li A N, Wu S B, Fan W L, Zeng Y L, Yan K, Xu B D, Li J and Liu Q H. 2018. PLC: a simple and semi-physical topographic correction method for vegetation canopies based on path length correction. Remote Sensing of Environment, 215: 184-198
  61. 61.
    Yin G F, Li A N, Zhao W, Jin H A, Bian J H and Wu S B. 2017. Modeling canopy reflectance over sloping terrain based on path length correction. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 55(8): 4597-4609
  62. 62.
    Yu W T, Li J, Liu Q H, Yin G F, Zeng Y L, Lin S R and Zhao J. 2020. A simulation-based analysis of topographic effects on lai inversion over sloped terrain. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 13: 794-806
  63. 63.
    Zhang W C and Gao Y N. 2011. Topographic correction algorithm for remotely sensed data accounting for indirect irradiance. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 32(7): 1807-1824
  64. 64.
    Zhang X Y and Kondragunta S. 2006. Estimating forest biomass in the USA using generalized allometric models and MODIS land products. Geophysical Research Letters, 33(9): L09402
  65. 65.
    Zhang Y L, Li X, Wen J G, Liu Q H and Yan G J. 2015. Improved topographic normalization for Landsat TM images by introducing the MODIS surface BRDF. Remote Sensing, 7(6): 6558-6575
  66. 66.
    Zheng D L, Rademacher J, Chen J Q, Crow T, Bresee M, Le Moine J and Ryu S R. 2004. Estimating aboveground biomass using Landsat 7 ETM+ data across a managed landscape in northern Wisconsin, USA. Remote Sensing of Environment, 93(3): 402-411
  67. 67.
    Zhu Z, Wulder M A, Roy D P, Woodcock C E, Hansen M C, Radeloff V C, Healey S P, Schaaf C, Hostert P, Strobl P, Pekel J F, Lymburner L, Pahlevan N and Scambos T A. 2019. Benefits of the free and open Landsat data policy. Remote Sensing of Environment, 224: 382-385

Leer el texto completo

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website