利用SVM的全极化、双极化与单极化SAR图像分类性能的比较
Comparison of Classification Performance of Full-,Dual- and Single-Polarization SAR Images Using SVM
- 2008年第1期 页码:46-53
纸质出版日期: 2008
DOI: 10.11834/jrs.20080107
扫 描 看 全 文
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
纸质出版日期: 2008 ,
扫 描 看 全 文
[1]吴永辉,计科峰,郁文贤.利用SVM的全极化、双极化与单极化SAR图像分类性能的比较[J].遥感学报,2008(01):46-53.
WU Yong-hui, JI Ke-feng, YU Wen-xian. Comparison of Classification Performance of Full-,Dual- and Single-Polarization SAR Images Using SVM[J]. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2008,(1):46-53.
支持向量机(SVM)以其在小训练样本时良好的分类性能
目前已广泛应用于多个领域。本文在极化SAR图像特征提取基础上
将SVM应用于极化SAR图像分类
定性和定量地比较了全极化、双极化和单极化SAR图像的分类性能
分析了不同的极化组合对分类结果的影响
并根据地物极化散射特性分析了分类精度差异的成因。实测极化SAR数据的实验结果表明
全极化数据能获得最好的分类性能
双极化次之
单极化最低
且在某些情况下
双极化与全极化分类性能接近。
Classification is an important process in interpretation of SAR images.In classification
the information
such as amplitude
phase and texture
is used to arrange all pixels in an image into different classes.A classification map shows directly classes of terrains
which is helpful to understand image.Classification methods of SAR images can be divided into supervised and unsupervised.Support vector machine(SVM) based on statistical learning theory
proposed by Vapnik et al.
is an effective supervised classifier.It is used widely in face recognition
hand-writing identification
and automatic target recognition for good classification performance with small training data sets.It has been a new focus in the field of machine learning.Several researchers have tried to use SVM for classifying polarimetric SAR images
and obtained promising results.As an advanced instrument for remote sensing
polarimetric synthetic aperture radar(SAR) has been applied widely in many fields
such as ecology
environmental monitoring
geological exploration
vegetation investigation
and so on.Compared with single-polarization SAR
to what extent dual-polarization and fully polarimetric SARs can improve in classifieation is important.Classification performance of full polarization versus dual and single polarization is compared qualitatively and quantitatively with SVM taken as the classifier in this paper.For fully polarimetric SAR data
six power values
extracted from the covariance matrix
and three eigenvalues
obtained by eigenvalue analysis technique using the coherency matrix
are contained in an input feature vector.For dual-polarization data
there are only three power values and two eigenvalues.And only one power value is used as an input feature for single-polarization data.In order to equilibrate effect of each element in an input feature vector on classification results
all features are normalized.According to the ground truth or a span image
training samples are selected to train SVM to obtain classifier parameters.Lastly
full-
dual-
and single-polarization SAR images are classified by the trained SVM
and the classification accuracy is calculated if the ground truth is available.In the first experiment
an L-band fully polarimetric image of Flevoland
Netherlands
acquired by the NASA/JPL AIRSAR sensor on August 16
1989
is used to analyze quantitatively the classification accuracy of full-
dual-
and singlepolarization SAR data.The results show that the classification accuracy of fully polarimetric SAR is highest
followed by dual-polarization SAR
and it is lowest for single-polarization SAR.For crop application
the accuracy of HH-VV SAR is greater than other two dual-polarization SARs
comparable with fully polarimetric SAR.If fully polarimetric SAR is unavailable
HH-VV SAR is a proper substitute with acceptable performance.Because of stronger depolarization capability
separability of each terrain in HV data is better than that in the other two cases.Consequently
classification accuracy of HV SAR is better than other two single-polarization SARs.For the two co-polarization SARs
performance of HH SAR is better than another.If the co-polarization transmitter and receiver are used
HH is more proper.In the second experiment
an HH-HV dual-polarization image
obtained in China
is used to analyze qualitatively classification performance of dual-and single-polarization SARs.The experimental results show that scattering power of building is badly confused with that of bank and bare soil due to weak depolarization of building.Thus the classification result of HV SAR is worse than HH SAR.Lastly
using detailed results of the above two experiments
classification performance difference of full-
dual-
and single-polarization SARs is explained from the point of view of scattering characteristics of terrains and operational mechanism of the classifier
SVM.
雷达极化合成孔径雷达分类
radar polarimetrysynthetic aperture radar(SAR)classification
相关作者
相关机构