土壤发射率光谱提取算法的对比研究
Algorithm Research of Soil Emissivity Extraction
- 2008年第5期 页码:699-706
纸质出版日期: 2008
DOI: 10.11834/jrs.20080591
扫 描 看 全 文
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
纸质出版日期: 2008 ,
扫 描 看 全 文
[1]程洁,肖青,李小文,柳钦火,杜永明.土壤发射率光谱提取算法的对比研究[J].遥感学报,2008(05):699-706.
CHENG Jie1, XIAO Qing1, LI Xiao-wen1, et al. Algorithm Research of Soil Emissivity Extraction[J]. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2008,(5):699-706.
土壤的发射率具有较大的不确定性
为了准确提取土壤的发射率
利用ASTER光谱库中的58条土壤光谱
模拟产生了热红外高光谱数据集
利用这些数据进行了土壤的发射率提取试验
分析了较为典型的几种温度发射率分离方法
如NEM、ISSTES、α剩余法、MMD、TES在土壤发射率提取中的适用性、稳定性和精度
并根据分析的结果对各种算法在土壤发射率反演中的应用进行了相应改进。对于NEM方法
给出了最优的最大发射率;对于MMD方法
提出了一种比原平均-最小最大发射率之差更好的经验关系;在TES方法中
使用ISSTES代替原先的NEM方法
获得了精确的发射率初始值。基于模拟数据的算法分析结果表明
对于地面测量高光谱数据的土壤发射率信息提取
ISSTES准确度最高。最后给出了使用这5种方法由地面实测高光谱数据提取的土壤发射率光谱实例
提取的发射率光谱的分布情况很好印证了基于模拟数据的算法分析结果。
Temperature and emissivity are two important parameters of thermal infrared remote sensing.Surface emitted radiance is a function of both its kinetic temperature and its spectral emissivity.Temperature and emissivity separation from radiometric measurements relates to the problems of solving N+1 parameters with N equations.Some approximations or assumptions must be taken to reduce the number of unknown parameters and make the equation complete.Many temperature and emissivity separation algorithms have been put forward according to the different strategies.Most of these temperature and emissivity separation algorithms are designed for processing multi-spectral data.As far as hyperspectral FTIR data is concerned
their applicability needs to be evaluated.Moreover
we explores whether there is an optimal algorithm for retrieving soil emissivity from hyperspectral FTIR data.Five typical temperature emissivity methods(e.g.NEM
ISSTES
alpha residual method
MMD and TES) were investigated in this study by simulated dataset.The simulated dataset is composed of two parts
simulated ground-leaving radiance and simulated atmospheric downward radiance.Totally 58 soil directional hemispherical reflectance were obtained from the ASTER spectral library
and were converted to emissivities based on Kirchhoff’s law.The soil temperature was assigned as 300K.The atmospheric downward radiance was simulated by MODTRAN4.0 in which the 1976 US atmosphere model was used.The simulated data was added a random Gauss noise with zero mean and standard deviation of 3.14e-9 W/cm2/sr/cm-1
which was the Noise Equivalent Spectral Radiance(NESR) of our spectrometer BOMEN MR 304 measured in laboratory.In order to evaluate these algorithms’ sensitivity of response to the instrument random noise
the simulated data added with zero mean and standard deviation of 2
4
6
8
10
15
20 times of instrument NESR were also considered.On the basis of the result
we draw some valuable conclusions.For NEM
an optimal maximum emissivity of 0.985 is suggested
the RMSE of derived soil emissivities and mean absolute temperature is minimum with this maximum emissivity.A better empirical relationship has been discovered to substitute the original mean-minimum maximum difference relationship in MMD method.The alpha residual method is not suitable to retrieve soil emissivity from hyperspectral FTIR data.By comparing the accuracy of NEM and ISSTES
we find that the RMSE of derived soil emissivities suing NEM under ideal condition is two times than ISSTES
so the original NEM module has been replaced by ISSTES to acquire the accurate initial value of emissivity in TES
the original power relationship in MMD module of TES has been replaced by a linear relationship for higher fit precision.As a conclusion
we find the ISSTES is the best method with the true instrument noise level
the RMSE of derived soil emissivities is only 0.0007 and the mean absolute temperature bias is only 0.02K.The RMSE of derived soil emissivities and the mean absolute temperature bias monotonically grow with the increase of instrument noise level.Finally
we present an example of soil emissivity extraction using five methods mentioned above with ground-based measured hyperspectral data
which were measured at our field test site with BOMEN MR 304 spectrometer on the afternoon of September 26
2005.The distribution of derived emissivity spectra verifies the results of algorithm analysis.
温度发射率分离反演土壤发射率高光谱数据遥感
相关作者
相关机构