相对轨道根数的重轨InSAR卫星基线分析与控制

张涛; 万玲; 吕孝雷; 洪峻

doi:10.11834/jrs.20197452

浏览量 : 0 下载量: 1168 CSCD: 0

PDF
导出
分享
收藏
专辑

相对轨道根数的重轨InSAR卫星基线分析与控制
Baseline analysis and control of spaceborne repeat-pass InSAR based on relative orbital elements
2019年23卷第6期页码：1123-1131
收稿：2017-11-11，

录用：2018-4-20，

纸质出版：2019-11
DOI： 10.11834/jrs.20197452
稿件说明：

移动端阅览

张涛, 万玲, 吕孝雷, 洪峻. 2019. 相对轨道根数的重轨InSAR卫星基线分析与控制. 遥感学报, 23(6): 1123–1131 DOI： 10.11834/jrs.20197452.

Zhang T, Wan L, LYU X L and Hong J. 2019. Baseline analysis and control of spaceborne repeat-pass InSAR based on relative orbital elements. Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(6): 1123–1131 DOI： 10.11834/jrs.20197452.

摘要

星载重轨干涉SAR卫星在高程测绘和形变测量中有着全天时全天候和大范围的优势，其中干涉基线是决定干涉性能的重要指标，而卫星重访轨道对干涉基线起着决定性的作用。通过对现有高分三号干涉数据轨道参数的分析，发现干涉基线相比国外先进卫星过长且稳定性有待提高。本文通过对相对轨道根数和机动控制的分析，得到满足重轨干涉SAR系统要求的稳定基线。以第一次观测的轨道为参考轨道，基于在摄动情况下重复观测轨道与参考轨道的相对轨道根数，计算得到重轨干涉基线的变化规律，并对不同纬度的观测目标进行了样例分析。在基线变化规律的基础上，利用机动速度和相对轨道根数的关系，进一步计算得到满足基线状态需求的机动控制方法。通过实际数据分析，给出了相对轨道根数变化对初始理想构型的影响，验证了重轨干涉基线变化规律符合本文的分析，并利用仿真样例给出了使得重轨干涉基线达到预期要求的机动控制方案。实际数据和仿真实验表明该模型能够通过可长时间观测并准确获得的轨道根数直接计算基线状态，并能从干涉基线需求出发，快速准确的得出对卫星的控制策略。

Abstract

Spaceborne repeat-pass InSAR is suitable for various elevation surveying and deformation measurements under all weather conditions. A satellite’s orbit is used to determine the interferometric baseline

which is an important index of interferometry performance. Result shows that the interferometric baseline of GF-3 satellite is longer than state-of-the-art repeat-pass InSAR systems overseas. However

its stability must be improved. This study aims to obtain a stable baseline that satisfies the requirements of repeat pass InSAR systems by analyzing the relative orbit elements and maneuver control. In this study

we use the first track of observation as the reference trajectory calculate the change law of repeat-pass baseline based on the relative orbit elements of repeated observations and reference orbits. Then

we analyze the baseline for targets under different latitudes. Based on the change law of baseline

we use the maneuver to adjust the relative orbit elements and develop a control method to achieve a baseline state. A repeat-pass InSAR baseline motion model was established on the basis of relative orbital elements to obtain a precise relative orbit. Real data were used to verify the model. The cross-baseline error between real data and the model was less than 10 m when the update frequency of orbit parameters was 1 Hz. We calculated the maneuver quantities based on relative orbital elements and formulated a control strategy for a special baseline control task. The change law of repeat pass InSAR baseline in global observation is analyzed

and the baseline length at different latitudes is obtained through the existing orbit control method

thus providing the basis for baselines when observing in different regions. The baseline length model is verified on the basis of actual data

and the actual baseline motion is determined in accordance with the model analysis. Then

an adjustment model based on the difference of relative orbital elements is established

and a control strategy from the predicted baseline to the required baseline is developed. Through the analysis of this study

the lengths of different observed baselines can be predicted with the number of known orbital elements

and the control strategy is adopted to adjust the observation baseline to satisfy the demand.

关键词

Keywords

references

曹喜滨, 张锦绣, 王峰. 2013. 航天器编队动力学与控制. 北京: 国防工业出版社

Cao X B, Zhang J X and Wang F. 2013. The Dynamics and Control of Spacecraft Formation Flying. Beijing: National Defence Industry Press

Clohessy W H. 1960. Terminal guidance system for satellite rendezvous. Journal of the Aerospace Sciences, 27(9): 653–658

Ilcev S D. 2010. Low earth orbits (LEO)//Proceedings of the 20th International Crimean Conference " Microwave and Telecommunication Technology”. Sevastopol, Ukraine: IEEE: 406-408 [DOI: 10.1109/CRMICO.2010.5632690]

Jarnagin M P. 1965. Expansions in Elliptic Motion. Washington: U. S. Nautical Almanac Office

鞠冰, 昌虓, 谷德峰, 段晓君, 朱炬波, 王正明. 2017. 质心误差对分布式InSAR基线确定的影响及消除. 遥感学报, 21(4): 558–565

Ju B, Chang X, Gu D F, Duan X J, Zhu J B and Wang Z M. 2017. Analysis and mitigation of the Center-of-Mass errors for InSAR baseline determination. Journal of Remote Sensing, 21(4): 558–565

Krieger G, Moreira A, Fiedler H, Hajnsek I, Werner M, Younis M and Zink M. 2007. TanDEM-X: a satellite formation for high-resolution SAR interferometry. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 45(11): 3317–3341

McLeod I H, Cumming I G and Seymour M S. 1998. ENVISAT ASAR data reduction: impact on SAR interferometry. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 36(2): 589–602

Montenbruck O, Kahle R, D’Amico S and Ardaens J S. 2008. Navigation and control of the TanDEM-X formation. The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 56(3): 341–357

Montenbruck O, Kirschner M and D’Amico S. 2004. E-/I-Vector Separation for GRACE Proximity Operations. DLR/German Space Operations Center, TN 04-08. GSOC

Naasz B J. 2002. Classical Element Feedback Control for Spacecraft Orbital Maneuvers. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Rodriguez-Cassola M, Prats P, Schulze D, Tous-Ramon N, Steinbrecher U, Marotti L, Nannini M, Younis M, López-Dekker P, Zink M, Reigber A, Krieger G and Moreira A. 2011. First bistatic spaceborne SAR experiments with TanDEM-X//Proceedings of 2011 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Vancouver, BC, Canada: IEEE: 1393-1396 [DOI: 10.1109/igarss.2011.6049326]

Sedwick R and Schweighart S. 2001. Development and analysis of a high fidelity linearized J2 model for satellite formation flying//Proceedings of the AIAA Space 2001 Conference and Exposition. Albuquerque, NM, USA: AIAA [DOI: 10.2514/6.2001-4744]

Sengupta P and Vadali S R. 2007. Relative motion and the geometry of formations in keplerian elliptic orbits with arbitrary eccentricity. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 30(4): 953–964

Snoeij P, Geudtner D, Østergaard A, Navas-Traver I, Brown M, Rommen B, Bibby D, Torres R, Schwerdt M, Döring B, Zink M and Schrank D. 2012. Sentinel-1 in-orbit calibration plan//Proceedings of the 9th European Radar Conference. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IEEE: 334-336

Spurmann J and D’Amico S. 2011. Proximity operations of on-orbit servicing spacecraft using an eccentricity/inclination vector separation//Proceedings of the 22nd International Symposium on Spaceflight Dynamics. Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil: DLR

Vaddi S S, Vadali S R and Alfriend K T. 2003. Formation flying: accommodating nonlinearity and eccentricity perturbations. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 26(2): 214–223

曾琪明, 朱猛, 焦健. 2018. 地震地壳形变InSAR测量中的关键技术分析. 遥感学报, 22(s1): 17–31

Zeng Q M, Zhu M and Jiao J. 2018. Key technical issues in seismic crustal deformation measurement by InSAR. Journal of Remote Sensing, 22(s1): 17–31

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

SARBuD 1.0：面向深度学习的GF-3 精细模式SAR建筑数据集

高分三号卫星全极化SAR影像九寨沟地震滑坡普查

高分三号影像水体信息提取

GF-3全极化影像在地表浅覆盖区进行地质构造解译的新方法