数字半球摄影法获取植被表观聚集指数（ACI）采样尺度效应研究

佟一冬; 焦子锑; 尹思阳; 张小宁; 崔磊; 谢蕊; 郭静; 李思杰; 朱子栋

doi:10.11834/jrs.20221647

卫星定标应用验证 | 浏览量 : 0 下载量: 250 CSCD: 0 更多指标

R-PDF
PDF
导出
分享
收藏
专辑

数字半球摄影法获取植被表观聚集指数（ACI）采样尺度效应研究
Sampling scale effects of vegetation apparent clumping index obtained by digital hemispherical photography
2023年27卷第5期页码：1254-1268
纸质出版日期： 2023-05-07 ，
DOI： 10.11834/jrs.20221647

扫描看全文

佟一冬，焦子锑，尹思阳，张小宁，崔磊，谢蕊，郭静，李思杰，朱子栋.2023.数字半球摄影法获取植被表观聚集指数（ACI）采样尺度效应研究.遥感学报，27（5）： 1254-1268

Tong Y D，Jiao Z T，Yin S Y，Zhang X N，Cui L，Xie R，Guo J，Li S J and Zhu Z D. 2023. Sampling scale effects of vegetation apparent clumping index obtained by digital hemispherical photography. National Remote Sensing Bulletin， 27（5）：1254-1268
佟一冬，焦子锑，尹思阳，张小宁，崔磊，谢蕊，郭静，李思杰，朱子栋.2023.数字半球摄影法获取植被表观聚集指数（ACI）采样尺度效应研究.遥感学报，27（5）： 1254-1268 DOI： 10.11834/jrs.20221647.

Tong Y D，Jiao Z T，Yin S Y，Zhang X N，Cui L，Xie R，Guo J，Li S J and Zhu Z D. 2023. Sampling scale effects of vegetation apparent clumping index obtained by digital hemispherical photography. National Remote Sensing Bulletin， 27（5）：1254-1268 DOI： 10.11834/jrs.20221647.

摘要

植被聚集指数CI（Clumping Index）表征植被冠层叶片的聚集程度，是影响冠层内辐射传输的重要植被结构参数，对更好地理解冠层的辐射传输具有重要意义。数字半球摄影法DHP（Digital Hemispherical Photography）与有限长度平均方法的结合被广泛应用于地面CI估算，研究表明，有限长度平均法应用于DHP图像时所划分的采样单元大小与CI测量结果密切相关，即CI随图像采样尺度的变化会表现出有意义的变化，植被表观聚集指数ACI（Apparent Clumping Index ）故应运而生，ACI的提出有助于加深对植被聚集效应的理解，拓展植被CI的地面间接测量，同时也对CI星载遥感产品的验证提出了新的挑战。目前，应用有限长度平均法估算ACI时，DHP图像中划分的采样单元的大小对ACI估算的影响规律，及其随不同植被类型的变化规律有待进一步探索。针对上述问题，本研究基于DHP图像，分别以一系列逐级增大的角度采样尺度对观测天顶角和方位角进行划分，共得到30种采样方法、17级角度采样分辨率，并将其分别应用于林、灌、草和农作物四种地类，探究了ACI在不同植被类型下随17级角度采样分辨率变化而变化的规律；同时，探讨了ACI的角度采样尺度效应与植被在空间中的分布形态，以及农作物生长阶段之间的密切联系。结果表明，在四种地类下，随17级角度采样分辨率的降低ACI从约0.5变化至0.8，平均增幅分别达到26%、29%、14%和35%；在大豆作物的不同生长阶段，随17级角度采样分辨率由高到低的变化，ACI的增长存在一定差异，增幅最大可达60%。本研究针对CI地面测量的不一致性问题展开研究，揭示了ACI角度采样尺度效应的方向依赖性规律，总结了不同植被类型下角度采样尺度对ACI估算结果影响的统一性和差异性，有望为CI遥感产品验证的不确定性分析提供地面测量数据变化的精细分析支撑。

Abstract

The Clumping Index (CI) represents the degree of leaf aggregation in a canopy. It is an important vegetation structural parameter that affects radiative transport and is crucial to understanding radiative transport in canopies. The apparent clumping index (ACI) was proposed to deepen the understanding of the clumping effect and expand the field indirect measurement of CI. Studies have shown that ACI is closely related to the angular sampling scale. Even ACI measured by the same instrument changes considerably with the sampling scale

which presents a new challenge to the verification of CI products. The combination of digital hemispherical photography (DHP) and logarithmic average methods is widely used in field ACI estimation

and one of the key steps of this combination is the determination of the angular sampling resolution. At present

the influence of angular sampling resolution on ACI estimation and its variation with different vegetation types need to be further explored.

When using the logarithmic average method based on DHP measurement data

the angular sampling resolution is jointly determined by two factors: view zenith angle sampling scale (∆

) and view azimuth angle sampling scale (∆

). On the basis of DHP images

this study divided view zenith and view azimuth angles by using a series of progressively increasing angular sampling scales. A total of 30 sampling methods and 17 levels of angular sampling resolutions were obtained and applied to forest

shrub

grass

and crops. The variation in ACI under different vegetation types was investigated with the decrease in the resolution of the 17 levels of sampling. At the same time

the relationship among the angular sampling scale effect of ACI

the spatial distribution of vegetation

and the growth stage of crops was discussed.

Results showed that ACI varied from 0.5 to 0.8 in the four vegetation types with the decrease in the 17-level angular sampling resolution and exhibited an average increase of 26%

29%

14%

and 35%. At the different growth stages of soybean crops

ACI increased (up to 60%) with the decrease in the 17-level angular sampling resolution. In general

ACI was directionally dependent on the change in the angular sampling scale

and this characteristic was affected by the spatial distribution of the observed objects. When the observed objects were randomly distributed (forest

shrub

and grass)

ACI generally showed a linear growth trend with the increase in VZA and VAA sampling scales; when the observed object had a regular distribution (soybean crop)

ACI was still affected by VZA and VAA sampling scales

and the influence of the VZA sampling scale on ACI was highly significant.

The results of this study showed that ACI increased with the increase in the angular sampling scale

that is

with the increase in the angular sampling scale

vegetation aggregation weakened and gradually exhibited a random distribution. This study further explored the directional dependence of ACI on the change in the angular sampling scale for different vegetation types. How to select the optimal angular sampling scale for different vegetation types is expected be the focus of future research. A detailed analysis of ACI field measurement and an in-depth discussion of the possible uncertainties in the measurement process are prerequisites for performing an authenticity inspection of CI products. They are also essential for improving the accuracy of CI estimation and CI product verification.

关键词

植被聚集指数（CI）植被表观聚集指数（ACI）数字半球摄影法（DHP）角度采样尺度尺度效应方向性

Keywords

Clumping Index (CI)Apparent Clumping Index (ACI)Digital Hemispherical Photography (DHP)angular sampling scalescale-effectdirectionality

references

Baldocchi D D and Wilson K B. 2001. Modeling CO2 and water vapor exchange of a temperate broadleaved forest across hourly to decadal time scales. Ecological Modelling, 142(1/2): 155-184 [DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00287-3http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00287-3]

Chen J M. 1996. Optically-based methods for measuring seasonal variation of leaf area index in boreal conifer stands. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 80(2/4): 135-163 [DOI: 10.1016/0168-1923(95)02291-0http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(95)02291-0]

Chen J M and Black T A. 1991. Measuring leaf area index of plant canopies with branch architecture. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 57(1/3): 1-12 [DOI: 10.1016/0168-1923(91)90074-Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(91)90074-Z]

Chen J M and Black T A. 1992. Foliage area and architecture of plant canopies from sunfleck size distributions. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 60(3/4): 249-266 [DOI: 10.1016/0168-1923(92)90040-Bhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(92)90040-B]

Chen J M and Cihlar J. 1995. Plant canopy gap-size analysis theory for improving optical measurements of leaf-area index. Appl Opt, 34(27): 6211-22 [DOI: 10.1364/AO.34.006211http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.34.006211]

Chen J M, Liu J, Leblanc S G, Lacaze R and Roujean J L. 2003. Multi-angular optical remote sensing for assessing vegetation structure and carbon absorption. Remote Sensing of Environment, 84(4): 516-525 [DOI: 10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00150-5http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00150-5]

Chen J M, Menges C H and Leblanc S G. 2005. Global mapping of foliage clumping index using multi-angular satellite data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 97(4): 447-457 [DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2005.05.003http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2005.05.003]

Demarez V, Duthoit S, Baret F, Weiss M and Dedieu G. 2008. Estimation of leaf area and clumping indexes of crops with hemispherical photographs. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 148(4): 644-655 [DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.11.015http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.11.015]

Fang H L. 2021. Canopy clumping index (CI): a review of methods, characteristics, and applications. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 303: 108374 [DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108374http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108374]

Fang H L, Li W J, Wei S S and Jiang C Y. 2014. Seasonal variation of leaf area index (LAI) over paddy rice fields in NE China: intercomparison of destructive sampling, LAI-2200, digital hemispherical photography (DHP), and AccuPAR methods. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 198-199: 126-141 [DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.08.005http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.08.005]

Fang H L, Liu W W, Li W J and Wei S S. 2018a. Estimation of the directional and whole apparent clumping index (ACI) from indirect optical measurements. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 144: 1-13 [DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.06.022http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.06.022]

Fang H L, Ye Y C, Liu W W, Wei S S and Ma L. 2018b. Continuous estimation of canopy leaf area index (LAI) and clumping index over broadleaf crop fields: an investigation of the PASTIS-57 instrument and smartphone applications. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 253-254: 48-61 [DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.02.003http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.02.003]

Garrigues S, Shabanov N V, Swanson K, Morisette J T, Baret F and Myneni R B. 2008. Intercomparison and sensitivity analysis of Leaf Area Index retrievals from LAI-2000, AccuPAR, and digital hemispherical photography over croplands. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 148(8-9): 1193-1209 [DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.02.014http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.02.014]

Gonsamo A, Walter J M N and Pellikka P. 2010. Sampling gap fraction and size for estimating leaf area and clumping indices from hemispherical photographs. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 40(8): 1588-1603 [DOI: 10.1139/X10-085http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/X10-085]

Kucharik C J, Norman J M and Gower S T. 1999. Characterization of radiation regimes in nonrandom forest canopies: theory, measurements, and a simplified modeling approach. Tree Physiology, 19(11): 695-706

Lang A R G and Xiang Y Q. 1986. Estimation of leaf area index from transmission of direct sunlight in discontinuous canopies. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 37(3): 229-243 [DOI: 10.1016/0168-1923(86)90033-Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(86)90033-X]

Leblanc S G, Chen J M, Fernandes R, Deering D W and Conley A. 2005. Methodology comparison for canopy structure parameters extraction from digital hemispherical photography in boreal forests. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 129(3-4): 187-207 [DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.09.006http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.09.006]

Liu S, Yang J Y, Zhang X Y, Drury C F, Reynolds W D and Hoogenboom G. 2013. Modelling crop yield, soil water content and soil temperature for a soybean-maize rotation under conventional and conservation tillage systems in Northeast China. Agricultural Water Management, 123: 32-44 [DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2013.03.001http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2013.03.001]

Miller J B. 1967. A formula for average foliage density. Australian Journal of Botany, 15(1): 141-144 [DOI: 10.1071/BT9670141http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/BT9670141]

Nilson T. 1971. A theoretical analysis of the frequency of gaps in plant stands. Agricultural Meteorology, 8: 25-38 [DOI: 10.1016/0002-1571(71)90092-6http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-1571(71)90092-6]

Pisek J, Lang M, Nilson T, Korhonen L and Karu H. 2011. Comparison of methods for measuring gap size distribution and canopy nonrandomness at Järvselja RAMI (RAdiation transfer Model Intercomparison) test sites. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 151(3): 365-377 [DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.11.009http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.11.009]

Ryu Y, Sonnentag, O,Nilson T,Vargas R,Kobayashi H,Wenk R and Baldocchi D D. 2010. How to quantify tree leaf area index in an open savanna ecosystem: A multi-instrument and multi-model approach. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 150(1): 63-76 [DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.08.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.08.007]

Song J Y. 2017. Research on method of foresty canopy LAI inversion using hemispherical image. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University: 120

宋佳音. 2017. 利用半球图像反演森林冠层叶面积指数的方法研究. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学: 120

van Gardingen P R, Jackson G E, Hernandez-Daumas S, Russell G and Sharp L. 1999. Leaf area index estimates obtained for clumped canopies using hemispherical photography. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 94(3/4): 243-257 [DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1923(99)00018-0http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(99)00018-0]

Walter J M N, Fournier R A, Soudani K and Meyer E. 2003. Integrating clumping effects in forest canopy structure: an assessment through hemispherical photographs. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(3): 388-410 [DOI: 10.5589/m03-011http://dx.doi.org/10.5589/m03-011]

Yan G J, Hu R H, Luo J H, Mu X H, Xie D H and Zhang W M. 2016. Review of indirect methods for leaf area index measurement. Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(5): 958-978

阎广建, 胡容海, 罗京辉, 穆西晗, 谢东辉, 张吴明. 2016. 叶面积指数间接测量方法. 遥感学报, 20(5): 958-978 [DOI: 10.11834/jrs.20166238http://dx.doi.org/10.11834/jrs.20166238]

Zou J, Hou W, Chen L, Wang Q F, Zhong P H, Zuo Y, Luo S Z and Leng P. 2020. Evaluating the impact of sampling schemes on leaf area index measurements from digital hemispherical photography in Larix principis-rupprechtii forest plots. Forest Ecosystems, 7(1): 52 [DOI: 10.1186/s40663-020-00262-zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40663-020-00262-z]

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

暂无数据