卫星观测在甲烷排放清单校核中的应用

张羽中; 毛慧琴; 陈翠红; 梁若思

doi:10.11834/jrs.20243350

浏览量 : 0 下载量: 21 CSCD: 0 更多指标

R-PDF
PDF
导出
分享
收藏
专辑

卫星观测在甲烷排放清单校核中的应用
Application of Satellite Observations to Verifying Methane Emission Inventories
2024年页码：1-15
网络出版日期： 2024-03-07 ，
DOI： 10.11834/jrs.20243350

扫描看全文

张羽中，毛慧琴，陈翠红，梁若思.XXXX.卫星观测在甲烷排放清单校核中的应用.遥感学报，XX（XX）： 1-15

ZHANG Yuzhong，MAO Huiqin，CHEN Cuihong，LIANG Ruosi. XXXX. Application of Satellite Observations to Verifying Methane Emission Inventories. National Remote Sensing Bulletin， XX（XX）：1-15
张羽中，毛慧琴，陈翠红，梁若思.XXXX.卫星观测在甲烷排放清单校核中的应用.遥感学报，XX（XX）： 1-15 DOI： 10.11834/jrs.20243350.

ZHANG Yuzhong，MAO Huiqin，CHEN Cuihong，LIANG Ruosi. XXXX. Application of Satellite Observations to Verifying Methane Emission Inventories. National Remote Sensing Bulletin， XX（XX）：1-15 DOI： 10.11834/jrs.20243350.

摘要

甲烷是重要的温室气体。大气中的甲烷排放来源多，影响因素复杂，基于排放因子和活动水平的“自下而上”编制的排放清单有较大的不确定性。覆盖全球的甲烷卫星观测为“自上而下”的验证及校正排放清单提供了有效手段。本文系统介绍了利用甲烷卫星观测和大气传输模型进行正向和反演清单校核的原理方法、关键技术和研究现状。以2020年为例，应用GOSAT卫星甲烷观测、GEOS-Chem大气化学传输模型对全球甲烷排放清单进行了正向和反演校核。国别校核结果表明，在甲烷排放量最大的10个国家中，中国、印尼排放量显著低于先验清单，俄罗斯、印度、孟加拉国排放显著高于先验清单，其它国家与先验估计无统计显著的区别。最后，本文展望了基于卫星观测的甲烷清单校核技术的发展方向。

Abstract

ObjectiveMethane is a strong greenhouse gas responsible for roughly a quarter of radiative forcing since industrialization. Reducing anthropogenic methane emissions is considered a vital measure to slow down climate change. Conventional “bottom-up” inventories

compiled based on emission factors and activity data

are subject to large uncertainties. Atmospheric observations such as those made by satellite instruments provide a useful “top-down” approach to verifying and improving emission inventories. The objective of this study is to present the application of satellite observations to the verification of methane emission inventories through forward simulations and inversion analyses.MethodWe first presented varied types of satellite observations (short-wave infrared vs. thermal infrared observations

area-flux mappers vs. point-source imagers) and retrieval methods (CO

-proxy method vs. full-physics method) and their suitability for inventory verification. We then discussed extensively the role of chemical transport models in interpreting satellite observations

the method of properly comparing model methane simulations to satellite column observations

and the effects of simulation errors on emission inventory verification. Finally

we demonstrated the two-stage verification with forward simulations and then an inverse analysis for global methane emissions

using the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model

GOSAT methane column observations for 2020

and two sets of bottom-up emission inventories.ResultIn the forward simulation

we developed a bias correction procedure to reduce the season- and latitude-dependent systematic biases. The bias-corrected simulation results were compared with satellite column observations to qualitatively assess the quality of emission inventories. In the inverse analyses

we presented the quantification of emissions for top methane-emitting countries. The results showed that the prior inventory significantly overestimated methane emissions in China and Indonesia

underestimated in Russia

India

and Bangladesh

and statistically agreed with the rest. Finally

the paper provided an outlook for the application of satellite observations in the field of methane monitoring and discussed the direction for future technical developments.ConclusionThe paper demonstrated the potential of using satellite observations to verify methane emission inventories. While the forward simulation is a fast but qualitative method

the inverse analyses provided a more quantitative verification of emission inventories.

关键词

温室气体甲烷卫星碳排放清单校核反演

Keywords

Greenhouse gasMethaneSatelliteCarbon emissionsInventory verificationInversion

references

Alexe M, Bergamaschi P, Segers A, Detmers R, Butz A, Hasekamp O, Guerlet S, Parker R, Boesch H, Frankenberg C, Scheepmaker R A, Dlugokencky E, Sweeney C, Wofsy S C, and Kort E A. 2015. Inverse modelling of CH4 emissions for 2010–2011 using different satellite retrieval products from GOSAT and SCIAMACHY. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15(1): 113-133 [DOI: 10.5194/acp-15-113-2015http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-113-2015]

Alvarez R A, Zavala-Araiza D, Lyon D R, Allen D T, Barkley Z R, Brandt A R, Davis K J, Herndon S C, Jacob D J, Karion A, Kort E A, Lamb B K, Lauvaux T, Maasakkers J D, Marchese A J, Omara M, Pacala S W, Peischl J, Robinson A L, Shepson P B, Sweeney C, Townsend-Small A, Wofsy S C, and Hamburg S P. 2018. Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain. Science, 361(6398): 186-188 [DOI: 10.1126/science.aar7204http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aar7204]

Balasus N, Jacob D J, Lorente A, Maasakkers J D, Parker R J, Boesch H, Chen Z, Kelp M M, Nesser H, and Varon D J. 2023. A blended TROPOMI+GOSAT satellite data product for atmospheric methane using machine learning to correct retrieval biases. Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., 2023: 1-40 [DOI: 10.5194/amt-2023-47http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-47]

Bloom A A, Bowman K W, Lee M, Turner A J, Schroeder R, Worden J R, Weidner R, McDonald K C, and Jacob D J. 2017. A global wetland methane emissions and uncertainty dataset for atmospheric chemical transport models (WetCHARTs version 1.0). Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 2141–2156 [DOI: 10.5194/gmd-10-2141-2017http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2141-2017]

Bruhwiler L, Dlugokencky E, Masarie K, Ishizawa M, Andrews A, Miller J, Sweeney C, Tans P, and Worthy D. 2014. CarbonTracker-CH4: an assimilation system for estimating emissions of atmospheric methane. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 8269-8293 [DOI: 10.5194/acp-14-8269-2014http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8269-2014].

Bu T T, Wang X H, Ye H H, and Jiang X H. 2016. Errors Analysis and Correction in Atmospheric Methane Retrieval Based on Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite Data. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 36(01):186-190 [DOI: 10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2016)01-0186-05http://dx.doi.org/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2016)01-0186-05]

卜婷婷,王先华,叶函函,江新华.基于GOSAT卫星数据的大气甲烷反演误差分析及校正. 2016. 光谱学与光谱分析,36(01):186-190

Buchwitz M, Reuter M, Schneising O, Boesch H, Guerlet S, Dils B, Aben I, Armante R, Bergamaschi P, Blumenstock T, Bovensmann H, Brunner D, Buchmann B, Burrows J P, Butz A, Chédin A, Chevallier F, Crevoisier C D, Deutscher N M, Frankenberg C, Hase F, Hasekamp O P, Heymann J, Kaminski T, Laeng A, Lichtenberg G, De Mazière M, Noël S, Notholt J, Orphal J, Popp C, Parker R, Scholze M, Sussmann R, Stiller G P, Warneke T, Zehner C, Bril A, Crisp D, Griffith D W T, Kuze A, O'Dell C, Oshchepkov S, Sherlock V, Suto H, Wennberg P, Wunch D, Yokota T, and Yoshida Y. 2015. The Greenhouse Gas Climate Change Initiative (GHG-CCI): Comparison and quality assessment of near-surface-sensitive satellite-derived CO2 and CH4 global data sets. Remote Sensing of Environment, 162: 344-362 [DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2013.04.024http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.04.024]

Cai B F, Zhu S L, Yu S M, Dong H M, Zhang C Y, Wang C K, Zhu J H, Gao Q X, Fang S X, Pan X B, and Zheng X H. 2019. The Interpretation of 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventory. Environmental Engineering, 37(8), 1-11 [DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.201908001http://dx.doi.org/10.13205/j.hjgc.201908001]

蔡博峰,朱松丽,于胜民,董红敏,张称意,王长科,朱建华,高庆先,方双喜,潘学标,郑循华.2019.《IPCC 2006年国家温室气体清单指南2019修订版》解读.环境工程,37(08):1-11

Chen L F, Shang H Z, Fan M, Tao J H, Husi L T, Zhang Y, Wang H M, Cheng L X, Zhang X X, Wei L S, Li M Y, Zou M M, Liu D D. 2021. Mission overview of the GF-5 satellite for atmospheric parameter monitoring. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 25(9):1917-1931 [DOI: 10.11834/jrs.20210582]

陈良富, 尚华哲, 范萌, 陶金花, 胡斯勒图, 张莹, 王红梅, 程良晓,张欣欣, 伟乐斯, 李明阳, 邹铭敏, 刘冬冬. 2021. 高分五号卫星大气参数探测综述. 遥感学报, 25(9):1917-1931. DOI： 10.11834/jrs.20210582.Crippa M,

Guizzardi D, Solazzo E, Muntean M, Schaaf E, Monforti-Ferrario F, Banja M, Olivier J G J, Grassi G, Rossi S, and Vignati E. 2021. GHG emissions of all world countries - 2021 Report, EUR 30831 EN, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union [DOI: 10.2760/173513http://dx.doi.org/10.2760/173513]

Cusworth D H, Jacob D J, Varon D J, Miller C, Liu X, Chance K, Thorpe A K, Duren R M, Miller C E, Thompson D R, Frankenberg C, Guanter L, and Randles C A. 2019. Potential of next-generation imaging spectrometers to detect and quantify methane point sources from space. Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 5655-5668 [DOI: 10.5194/amt-12-5655-2019http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-5655-2019]

Cusworth D H, Duren R M, Yadav V, Thorpe A K, Verhulst K, Sander S, Hopkins F, Rafiq T, and Miller C E. 2020. Synthesis of Methane Observations Across Scales: Strategies for Deploying a Multitiered Observing Network. Geophysical Research Letters, 47, e2020GL087869 [DOI: 10.1029/2020GL087869http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2020GL087869]

Dlugokencky E J, Bruhwiler L, White J W C, Emmons L K, Novelli P C, Montzka S A, Masarie K A, Lang P M, Crotwell A M, Miller J B, and Gatti L V. 2009. Observational constraints on recent increases in the atmospheric CH4 burden. Geophysical Research Letters, 36(18): n/a-n/a [DOI: 10.1029/2009GL039780http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009GL039780]

Ehret T, De Truchis A, Mazzolini M, Morel J M, d’Aspremont A, Lauvaux T, and Facciolo G. 2022. Global tracking and quantification of oil and gas methane leaks from recurrent Sentinel-2 imagery, arXiv, 2110.11832v1, physics.ao-ph [DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2110.11832http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2110.11832]

Fang S X, Zhou L X, Xu L, Yao B, Liu L X, Xia L J, and Wang H Y. 2012. CH4 Concentrations and the Variation Characteristics at the Four WMO/GAW Background Stations in China. Environmental Science, 33(09):2917-2923 [DOI: 10.13227/j.hjkx.2012.09.026http://dx.doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.2012.09.026]

方双喜,周凌晞,许林,姚波,刘立新,夏玲君,王红阳. 2012. 我国4个WMO/GAW本底站大气CH4浓度及变化特征. 环境科学,33(09):2917-2923

Frankenberg C, Meirink J F, Bergamaschi P, Goede A P H, Heimann M, Körner S, Platt U, van Weele M, and Wagner T. 2006. Satellite chartography of atmospheric methane from SCIAMACHY on board ENVISAT: Analysis of the years 2003 and 2004. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 111(D7) [DOI: 10.1029/2005jd006235]

Fraser A, Palmer P I, Feng L, Boesch H, Cogan A, Parker R, Dlugokencky E J, Fraser P J, Krummel P B, Langenfelds R L, O'Doherty S, Prinn R G, Steele L P, van der Schoot M, and Weiss R F. 2013. Estimating regional methane surface fluxes: the relative importance of surface and GOSAT mole fraction measurements. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5697-5713 [DOI: 10.5194/acp-13-5697-2013http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5697-2013]

Guanter L, Irakulis-Loitxate I, Gorroño J, Sánchez-García E, Cusworth D H, Varon D J, Cogliati S, and Colombo R. 2021. Mapping methane point emissions with the PRISMA spaceborne imaging spectrometer. Remote Sensing of Environment, 265, 112671 [DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112671].

Huijnen V, Williams J, van Weele M, van Noije T, Krol M, Dentener F, Segers A, Houweling S, Peters W, de Laat J, Boersma F, Bergamaschi P, van Velthoven P, Le Sager P, Eskes H, Alkemade F, Scheele R, Nédélec P, and Pätz H W. 2010. The global chemistry transport model TM5: description and evaluation of the tropospheric chemistry version 3.0. Geosci. Model Dev., 3(2): 445-473 [DOI: 10.5194/gmd-3-445-2010http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-445-2010]

Irakulis-Loitxate I, Guanter L, Liu Y-N, Varon D J, Maasakkers J D, Zhang Y, Chulakadabba A, Wofsy S C, Thorpe A K, Duren R M, Frankenberg C, Lyon D R, Hmiel B, Cusworth D H, Zhang Y, Segl K, Gorroño J, Sánchez-García E, Sulprizio M P, Cao K, Zhu H, Liang J, Li X, Aben I, and Jacob D J. 2021. Satellite-based survey of extreme methane emissions in the Permian basin. Science Advances, 7, eabf4507 [DOI : 10.1126/sciadv.abf4507http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abf4507]

Jacob D J, Turner A J, Maasakkers J D, Sheng J, Sun K, Liu X, Chance K, Aben I, McKeever J, and Frankenberg C. 2016. Satellite observations of atmospheric methane and their value for quantifying methane emissions. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16(22): 14371-14396 [DOI: 10.5194/acp-16-14371-2016http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14371-2016]

Jacob D J, Varon D J, Cusworth D H, Dennison P E, Frankenberg C, Gautam R, Guanter L, Kelley J, McKeever J, Ott L E, Poulter B, Qu Z, Thorpe A K, Worden J R, and Duren R M. 2022. Quantifying methane emissions from the global scale down to point sources using satellite observations of atmospheric methane. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22(14): 9617-9646 [DOI: 10.5194/acp-22-9617-2022http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9617-2022]

Jervis D, McKeever J, Durak B O A, Sloan J J, Gains D, Varon D J, Ramier A, Strupler M, and Tarrant E. 2021. The GHGSat-D imaging spectrometer. Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 2127-2140 [DOI: 10.5194/amt-14-2127-2021http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2127-2021]

Jones A, Thomson D, Hort M, and Devenish B: The U.K. Met Office's Next-Generation Atmospheric Dispersion Model, NAME III, Air Pollution Modeling and Its Application XVII, Boston, MA, 2007, 580-589.

Kuze A, Suto H, Shiomi K, Kawakami S, Tanaka M, Ueda Y, Deguchi A, Yoshida J, Yamamoto Y, Kataoka F, Taylor T E, and Buijs H L. 2016. Update on GOSAT TANSO-FTS performance, operations, and data products after more than 6 years in space. Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9(6): 2445-2461 [DOI: 10.5194/amt-9-2445-2016http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2445-2016]

Li F, Sun S W, Zhang Y G, Feng C X, Chen C H, Mao H Q, Liu Y N. 2023. Mapping methane super-emitters in China and United States with GF5-02 hyperspectral imaging spectrometer. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 2023,1-15 [DOI : 10.11834/jrs.2023245http://dx.doi.org/10.11834/jrs.2023245]

李飞, 孙世玮, 张永光, 封晨曦, 陈翠红, 毛慧琴, 刘银年. 2023. 高分五号02星高光谱成像仪中美典型甲烷超级排放源遥感反演与分析. 遥感学报, 2023,1-15

) Liang R, Zhang Y, Liu J, Chen W, Zhang P, Chen C, Mao H, Shen G, Qu Z, Chen Z, Zhou M, Wang P, Parker R J, Boesch H, Lorente A, Maasakkers J D, and Aben I. 2022. East Asian methane emissions inferred from high-resolution inversions of GOSAT and TROPOMI observations: a comparative and evaluative analysis. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 2022: 1-25 [DOI: 10.5194/acp-2022-508http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-508]

Lin J C, Gerbig C, Wofsy S C, Andrews A E, Daube B C, Davis K J, and Grainger C A. 2003. A near-field tool for simulating the upstream influence of atmospheric observations: The Stochastic Time-Inverted Lagrangian Transport (STILT) model. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 108(D16) [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003161]

Liu L Y，Chen L F，Liu Y，Yang D X，Zhang X Y，Lu N M，Ju W M，Jiang F，Yin Z S，Liu G H，Tian L F，Hu D H，Mao H Q，Liu S H，Zhang J H，Lei L P，Fan M，Zhang Y C，Zhou X and Wu Y R. 2022. Satellite remote sensing for global stocktaking：methods，progress and perspectives. National Remote Sensing Bulletin，26（2）：243-267［DOI：10.11834/jrs.20221806http://dx.doi.org/10.11834/jrs.20221806］

刘良云,陈良富,刘毅,杨东旭,张兴嬴,卢乃锰,居为民,江飞,尹增山,刘国华,田龙飞,胡登辉,毛慧琴,刘思含,张建辉,雷莉萍,范萌,张雨琮,周翔,吴一戎. 2022.全球碳盘点卫星遥感监测方法、进展与挑战.遥感学报, 26(02):243-267

Liu Y N, Sun D X, Hu X N, Liu S F, Cao K Q, Chai M Y, Liao Q J, Zuo Z Q, Hao Z Y, Duan W B, Zhou W Y N, Zhang J, and Zhang Y. 2020. Development of visible and short-wave infrared hyperspectral imager onboard GF-5 satellite. Journal of Remote Sensing, 24(4): 333-344 [DOI: 10.11834/jrs.20209196http://dx.doi.org/10.11834/jrs.20209196]

刘银年, 孙德新, 胡晓宁, 刘书锋，曹开钦，柴孟阳，廖清君，左志强，郝振贻，段微波，周魏乙诺，张静，张营. 2020. 高分五号可见短波红外高光谱相机设计与研制. 遥感学报, 24(4): 333-344

Lorente A, Borsdorff T, Butz A, Hasekamp O, aan de Brugh J, Schneider A, Wu L, Hase F, Kivi R, Wunch D, Pollard D F, Shiomi K, Deutscher N M, Velazco V A, Roehl C M, Wennberg P O, Warneke T, and Landgraf J. 2021. Methane retrieved from TROPOMI: improvement of the data product and validation of the first 2 years of measurements. Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14(1): 665-684 [DOI: 10.5194/amt-14-665-2021http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-665-2021]

Maasakkers J D, Jacob D J, Sulprizio M P, Scarpelli T R, Nesser H, Sheng J X, Zhang Y, Hersher M, Bloom A A, Bowman K W, Worden J R, Janssens-Maenhout G, and Parker R J. 2019. Global distribution of methane emissions, emission trends, and OH concentrations and trends inferred from an inversion of GOSAT satellite data for 2010–2015. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19(11): 7859-7881 [DOI: 10.5194/acp-19-7859-2019http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7859-2019]

Maasakkers J D, Varon D J, Elfarsdóttir A, McKeever J, Jervis D, Mahapatra G, Pandey S, Lorente A, Borsdorff T, Foorthuis L R, Schuit B J, Tol P, van Kempen T A, van Hees R, and Aben I. 2022. Using satellites to uncover large methane emissions from landfills. Science Advances, 8, eabn9683 [DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abn9683http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abn9683]

MacFarling Meure C, Etheridge D, Trudinger C, Steele P, Langenfelds R, van Ommen T, Smith A, and Elkins J. 2006. Law Dome CO2, CH4 and N2O ice core records extended to 2000 years BP. Geophysical Research Letters, 33(14) [DOI: 10.1029/2006GL026152]

Meirink J F, Bergamaschi P, and Krol M C. 2008. Four-dimensional variational data assimilation for inverse modelling of atmospheric methane emissions: method and comparison with synthesis inversion. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 6341-6353 [DOI: 10.5194/acp-8-6341-2008http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6341-2008].

Myhre G, Shindell D, Bréon F M, Collins W, Fuglestvedt J, Huang J, Koch D, Lamarque J F, Lee D, Mendoza B, Nakajima T, Robock A, Stephens G, Takemura T, and Zhang H. 2013. Anthropogenic and natural radiative forcing, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: StockerTF, QinD, PlattnerGK, TignorM, AllenSK, DoschungJ, NauelsA, XiaY, BexV, and MidgleyPM. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Nesser H, Jacob D J, Maasakkers J D, Scarpelli T R, Sulprizio M P, Zhang Y, and Rycroft C H. 2021. Reduced-cost construction of Jacobian matrices for high-resolution inversions of satellite observations of atmospheric composition. Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 5521–5534 [DOI: 10.5194/amt-14-5521-2021http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5521-2021]

Nisbet E G, Manning M R, Dlugokencky E J, Fisher R E, Lowry D, Michel S E, Myhre C L, Platt S M, Allen G, Bousquet P, Brownlow R, Cain M, France J L, Hermansen O, Hossaini R, Jones A E, Levin I, Manning A C, Myhre G, Pyle J A, Vaughn B H, Warwick N J, and White J W C. 2019. Very Strong Atmospheric Methane Growth in the 4 Years 2014–2017: Implications for the Paris Agreement. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 33(3): 318-342 [DOI: 10.1029/2018gb006009http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2018gb006009]

Noël S, Reuter M, Buchwitz M, Borchardt J, Hilker M, Schneising O, Bovensmann H, Burrows J P, Di Noia A, Parker R J, Suto H, Yoshida Y, Buschmann M, Deutscher N M, Feist D G, Griffith D W T, Hase F, Kivi R, Liu C, Morino I, Notholt J, Oh Y-S, Ohyama H, Petri C, Pollard D F, Rettinger M, Roehl C, Rousogenous C, Sha M K, Shiomi K, Strong K, Sussmann R, Té Y, Velazco V A, Vrekoussis M, and Warneke T. 2022. Retrieval of greenhouse gases from GOSAT and GOSAT-2 using the FOCAL algorithm. Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3401–3437 [DOI: 10.5194/amt-15-3401-2022http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3401-2022]

Palmer P I, Feng L, Lunt M F, Parker R J, Bösch H, Lan X, Lorente A, and Borsdorff T. 2021. The added value of satellite observations of methane forunderstanding the contemporary methane budget. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 379(2210): 20210106 [DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2021.0106http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0106]

Pandey S, van Nistelrooij M, Maasakkers J D, Sutar P, Houweling S, Varon D J, Tol P, Gains D, Worden J, and Aben I. 2023. Daily detection and quantification of methane leaks using Sentinel-3: a tiered satellite observation approach with Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-5p. Remote Sensing of Environment, 296: 113716 [DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2023.113716http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2023.113716]

Parker R J, Webb A, Boesch H, Somkuti P, Barrio Guillo R, Di Noia A, Kalaitzi N, Anand J, Bergamaschi P, Chevallier F, Palmer P I, Feng L, Deutscher N M, Feist D G, Griffith D W T, Hase F, Kivi R, Morino I, Notholt J, Oh Y S, Ohyama H, Petri C, Pollard D F, Roehl C, Sha M K, Shiomi K, Strong K, Sussmann R, Te Y, Velazco V A, Warneke T, Wennberg P O, and Wunch D. 2020. A Decade of GOSAT Proxy Satellite CH4 Observations. Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., 2020: 1-36 [DOI: 10.5194/essd-2020-114http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/essd-2020-114]

Peischl J, Eilerman S J, Neuman J A, Aikin K C, de Gouw J, Gilman J B, Herndon S C, Nadkarni R, Trainer M, Warneke C, and Ryerson T B. 2018. Quantifying Methane and Ethane Emissions to the Atmosphere From Central and Western U.S. Oil and Natural Gas Production Regions. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 123(14): 7725-7740 [DOI: 10.1029/2018jd028622http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2018jd028622]

Qin K, He Q, Kang H S, Hu W, Lu F, Cohen J. 2023. Progress and Prospect of Satellite Remote Sensing Research Applied to Methane Emissions from the Coal Industry. Acta Optica Sinica, 43(18): 1899908 [DOI : 10.3788/AOS231293http://dx.doi.org/10.3788/AOS231293]

秦凯, 何秦, 康涵书, 胡玮, 鹿凡, 科恩杰森. 2023. 煤炭行业甲烷排放卫星遥感研究进展与展望. 光学学报, 43(18): 1899908

Qu Z, Jacob D J, Shen L, Lu X, Zhang Y, Scarpelli T R, Nesser H, Sulprizio M P, Maasakkers J D, Bloom A A, Worden J R, Parker R J, and Delgado A L. 2021. Global distribution of methane emissions: a comparative inverse analysis of observations from the TROPOMI and GOSAT satellite instruments. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21(18): 14159-14175 [DOI: 10.5194/acp-21-14159-2021http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14159-2021]

Saad K M, Wunch D, Deutscher N M, Griffith D W T, Hase F, De Mazière M, Notholt J, Pollard D F, Roehl C M, Schneider M, Sussmann R, Warneke T, and Wennberg P O. 2016. Seasonal variability of stratospheric methane: implications for constraining tropospheric methane budgets using total column observations. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16(21): 14003-14024 [DOI: 10.5194/acp-16-14003-2016http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14003-2016]

Sánchez-García E, Gorroño J, Irakulis-Loitxate I, Varon D J, and Guanter L. 2022. Mapping methane plumes at very high spatial resolution with the WorldView-3 satellite. Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 1657–1674 [DOI : 10.5194/amt-15-1657-2022http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1657-2022]

Saunois M, Stavert A R, Poulter B, Bousquet P, Canadell J G, Jackson R B, Raymond P A, Dlugokencky E J, Houweling S, Patra P K, Ciais P, Arora V K, Bastviken D, Bergamaschi P, Blake D R, Brailsford G, Bruhwiler L, Carlson K M, Carrol M, Castaldi S, Chandra N, Crevoisier C, Crill P M, Covey K, Curry C L, Etiope G, Frankenberg C, Gedney N, Hegglin M I, Höglund-Isaksson L, Hugelius G, Ishizawa M, Ito A, Janssens-Maenhout G, Jensen K M, Joos F, Kleinen T, Krummel P B, Langenfelds R L, Laruelle G G, Liu L, Machida T, Maksyutov S, McDonald K C, McNorton J, Miller P A, Melton J R, Morino I, Müller J, Murguia-Flores F, Naik V, Niwa Y, Noce S, O'Doherty S, Parker R J, Peng C, Peng S, Peters G P, Prigent C, Prinn R, Ramonet M, Regnier P, Riley W J, Rosentreter J A, Segers A, Simpson I J, Shi H, Smith S J, Steele L P, Thornton B F, Tian H, Tohjima Y, Tubiello F N, Tsuruta A, Viovy N, Voulgarakis A, Weber T S, van Weele M, van der Werf G R, Weiss R F, Worthy D, Wunch D, Yin Y, Yoshida Y, Zhang W, Zhang Z, Zhao Y, Zheng B, Zhu Q, Zhu Q, and Zhuang Q. 2020. The Global Methane Budget 2000–2017. Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12(3): 1561-1623 [DOI: 10.5194/essd-12-1561-2020http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1561-2020]

Scarpelli T R, Jacob D J, Maasakkers J D, Sulprizio M P, Sheng J X, Rose K, Romeo L, Worden J R, and Janssens-Maenhout G. 2020. A global gridded (0.1° × 0.1°) inventory of methane emissions from oil, gas, and coal exploitation based on national reports to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 563-575 [DOI: 10.5194/essd-12-563-2020http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-563-2020]

Shen L, Zavala-Araiza D, Gautam R, Omara M, Scarpelli T, Sheng J, Sulprizio M P, Zhuang J, Zhang Y, Qu Z, Lu X, Hamburg S P, and Jacob D J. 2021. Unravelling a large methane emission discrepancy in Mexico using satellite observations. Remote Sensing of Environment, 260: 112461 [DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112461http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112461]

Shi T, Han G, Ma X, Mao H, Chen C, Han Z, Pei Z, Zhang H, Li S, and Gong W. 2023. Quantifying factory-scale CO2/CH4 emission based on mobile measurements and EMISSION-PARTITION model: cases in China. Environmental Research Letters, 18 (3) : 034028 [DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/acbce7http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acbce7]

Shindell D, Kuylenstierna J C I, Vignati E, van Dingenen R, Amann M, Klimont Z, Anenberg S C, Muller N, Janssens-Maenhout G, Raes F, Schwartz J, Faluvegi G, Pozzoli L, Kupiainen K, Höglund-Isaksson L, Emberson L, Streets D, Ramanathan V, Hicks K, Oanh N T K, Milly G, Williams M, Demkine V, and Fowler D. 2012. Simultaneously Mitigating Near-Term Climate Change and Improving Human Health and Food Security. Science, 335(6065): 183-189 [DOI: 10.1126/science.1210026http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1210026]

Stanevich I, Jones D B A, Strong K, Parker R J, Boesch H, Wunch D, Notholt J, Petri C, Warneke T, Sussmann R, Schneider M, Hase F, Kivi R, Deutscher N M, Velazco V A, Walker K A, and Deng F. 2020. Characterizing model errors in chemical transport modeling of methane: impact of model resolution in versions v9-02 GEOS-Chemvof35j of its adjoint model. Geosci. Model Dev., 13(9): 3839-3862 [DOI: 10.5194/gmd-13-3839-2020http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3839-2020]

Sun W, Deng L, Wu G, Wu L, Han P, Miao Y, and Yao B. 2019. Atmospheric Monitoring of Methane in Beijing Using a Mobile Observatory. Atmosphere, 10(9): 554 [DOI : 10.3390/atmos10090554http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/atmos10090554]

Suto H, Kataoka F, Kikuchi N, Knuteson R O, Butz A, Haun M, Buijs H, Shiomi K, Imai H, and Kuze A. 2021. Thermal and near-infrared sensor for carbon observation Fourier transform spectrometer-2 (TANSO-FTS-2) on the Greenhouse gases Observing SATellite-2 (GOSAT-2) during its first year in orbit, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 2013–2039 [DOI: 10.5194/amt-14-2013-2021http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2013-2021]

Szopa S, Naik V, Adhikary B, Artaxo P, Berntsen T, Collins W D, Fuzzi S, Gallardo L, Scharr A K, Klimont Z, Liao H, Unger N, and Zanis P. 2021. Chapter 6: Short-Lived Climate Forcers, in: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Masson-DelmotteV, ZhaiP, PiraniA, ConnorsSL, PéanC, BergerS, CaudN, ChenY, GoldfarbL, GomisMI, HuangM, LeitzellK, LonnoyE, MatthewsJB R, MaycockTK, WaterfieldT, YelekçiO, YuR, and Zhou, B. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.

Turner A J, Jacob D J, Wecht K J, Maasakkers J D, Lundgren E, Andrews A E, Biraud S C, Boesch H, Bowman KW, Deutscher N M, Dubey M K, Griffith D W T, Hase F, Kuze A, Notholt J, Ohyama H, Parker R, Payne V H, Sussmann R, Sweeney C, Velazco V A, Warneke T, Wennberg P O, and Wunch D. 2015. Estimating global and North American methane emissions with high spatial resolution using GOSAT satellite data. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7049–7069 [DOI: 10.5194/acp-15-7049-2015http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7049-2015]

Varon D J, McKeever J, Jervis D, Maasakkers J D, Pandey S, Houweling S, Aben I, Scarpelli T, and Jacob D J. 2019. Satellite Discovery of Anomalously Large Methane Point Sources From Oil/Gas Production. Geophysical Research Letters, 46, 13507-13516 [DOI: 10.1029/2019gl083798http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2019gl083798]

Wang F, Maksyutov S, Tsuruta A, Janardanan R, Ito A, Sasakawa M, Machida T, Morino I, Yoshida Y, Kaiser J W, Janssens-Maenhout G, Dlugokencky E J, Mammarella I, Lavric J V, and Matsunaga T. 2019. Methane Emission Estimates by the Global High-Resolution Inverse Model Using National Inventories. Remote Sensing, 11(21): 2489 [DOI: 10.3390/rs11212489http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs11212489]

Wang Y, Guo X, Huo Y, Li M, Pan Y, Yu S, Baklanov A, Rosenfeld D, Seinfeld J H, and Li P. 2023. Toward a versatile spaceborne architecture for immediate monitoring of the global methane pledge. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 5233-5249 [DOI: 10.5194/acp-23-5233-2023http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5233-2023]

Worden J, Kulawik S, Frankenberg C, Payne V, Bowman K, Cady-Peirara K, Wecht K, Lee J E, and Noone D. 2012. Profiles of CH4, HDO, H2O, and N2O with improved lower tropospheric vertical resolution from Aura TES radiances. Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5(2): 397-411 [DOI: 10.5194/amt-5-397-2012http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-397-2012]

Yang K Y, Han G, Mao H Q, Dong Y N, Ma X, Li S W, Gong W. 2022. High-resolution XCH4 anomaly detection method using GF-5 AHSI payload. Journal of Atmospheric and Environmental Optics, 17(6) :670-678 [DOI : 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6141.2022.06.007http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-6141.2022.06.007]

杨可意,韩舸,毛慧琴,董燕妮,马昕,李四维,龚威.2022. 利用高分五号AHSI载荷的高分辨率XCH4异常探测方法研究. 大气与环境光学学报,17(6) :670-678

Yang X Y, Wang Z T, Pan G, Xiong W, Zhou W, Zhang L H, Wang Z J, Jiang T L, Liu J J, Dai Y Z, Ma P F, Li Q, Zhao S H. 2022. Advances in atmospheric observation techniques for greenhouse gases by satellite remote sensing. Journal of Atmospheric and Environmental Optics, 17(06):581-597 [DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6141.2022.06.001http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-6141.2022.06.001]

杨晓钰,王中挺,潘光,熊伟,周伟,张连华,王兆军,姜腾龙,刘建军,代亚贞,马鹏飞,厉青,赵少华. 2022. 卫星遥感温室气体的大气观测技术进展.大气与环境光学学报, 17(06):581-597

Yao L, Yang D X, Cai Z N, Zhu S H, Liu Y, Deng J B, Tian L F, Yin Z S, Lu N M. 2022. Status and Trend Analysis of Atmospheric Methane Satellite Measurement for Carbon Neutrality and Carbon Peaking in China. Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 46(6): 1469-1483 [DOI:10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.2207.22096http://dx.doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.2207.22096]

姚璐, 杨东旭, 蔡兆男, 朱思虹, 刘毅, 邓剑波, 田龙飞, 尹增山, 卢乃锰. 2022. 面向我国碳中和、碳达峰的大气甲烷观测卫星现状与发展趋势分析[J]. 大气科学, 46(6): 1469-1483

Yu X, Millet D B, Henze D K, Turner A J, Delgado A L, Bloom A A, and Sheng J. 2023. A high-resolution satellite-based map of global methane emissions reveals missing wetland, fossil fuel, and monsoon sources. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 3325-3346 [DOI: 10.5194/acp-23-3325-2023http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3325-2023]

Zhang Y, Jacob D J, Maasakkers J D, Sulprizio M P, Sheng J X, Gautam R, and Worden J. 2018. Monitoring global tropospheric OH concentrations using satellite observations of atmospheric methane. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18(21): 15959-15973 [DOI: 10.5194/acp-18-15959-2018http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15959-2018]

Zhang Y, Gautam R, Pandey S, Omara M, Maasakkers J D, Sadavarte P, Lyon D, Nesser H, Sulprizio M P, Varon D J, Zhang R, Houweling S, Zavala-Araiza D, Alvarez R A, Lorente A, Hamburg S P, Aben I, and Jacob D J. 2020. Quantifying methane emissions from the largest oil-producing basin in the United States from space. Science Advances, 6(17): eaaz5120 [DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz5120http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz5120]

Zhang Y, Jacob D J, Lu X, Maasakkers J D, Scarpelli T R, Sheng J X, Shen L, Qu Z, Sulprizio M P, Chang J, Bloom A A, Ma S, Worden J, Parker R J, and Boesch H. 2021. Attribution of the accelerating increase in atmospheric methane during 2010–2018 by inverse analysis of GOSAT observations. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21(5): 3643-3666 [DOI: 10.5194/acp-21-3643-2021http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3643-2021]

Zhao L. 2017. Remote Retrieval of Atmospheric CO2 and CH4 Using GOSAT. Changchun: Jilin University.

赵靓. 2017. 基于GOSAT卫星的大气CO2和CH4遥感反演研究.吉林大学

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

川滇局部区域甲烷地震监测可行性探索——以2021年9月四川泸县M6.0地震为例

PolInSAR森林高度反演中方法及波段选择引起的不确定性分析

大气环境卫星污染气体和大气颗粒物协同观测综述

全球碳盘点卫星遥感监测方法、进展与挑战

中国定量遥感发展的一些思考