Hang LIU, Zhengwei HE, Yinbing ZHAO, et al. Improved ROEWA edge detector for SAR Images. [J]. Journal of Remote sensing 21(2):273-279(2017)
DOI:
Hang LIU, Zhengwei HE, Yinbing ZHAO, et al. Improved ROEWA edge detector for SAR Images. [J]. Journal of Remote sensing 21(2):273-279(2017) DOI: 10.11834/jrs.20176045.
This paper reports on a method to improve the Ratio Of an Exponentially Weighted Averages (ROEWA) edge detector
so that the improved edge detector can accurately determine the positions and directions of edges for Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images. We attempt to build an optimal edge detector for SAR images to obtain better results of edge detection. The edge strength index is redefined as an inverted
signed
and normalized minimum ROEWA (IROEWA)
which is utilized to quantitatively describe the phase step of edges. A new method that accurately calculates edge direction is developed based on the edge strength map from IROEWA. We can obtain the possible values of edge directions in this manner
which continuously distributes from 0 degrees to 180 degrees. Therefore
we must improve the Non-Maximum Suppression (NMS) algorithm
so that it can process sub-pixels. Finally
the improved NMS algorithm is also added into the edge detection workflow. This improved edge detection algorithm is called IROEWA & NMS. We conducted two experiments for IROEWA & NMS: one employed nature SAR images
whereas the other adopted a simulation SAR image. Experiment results show that the IROEWA & NMS outperforms the original ROEWA with watershed thresholding. The IROEWA operator is faster than the ROEWA operator under the same conditions. We applied a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve to evaluate the IROEWA & NMS and determined that its Area Under the Curve (AUC) is 0.97570; thus
it approximates the ideal optimal detector. The detection rate at the position of the optimal point in the ROC curve of the IROEWA & NMS is as high as 0.95232
whereas the false alarm rate is as low as 0.00214. The IROEWA & NMS exhibits suitable performance on both the detection and false alarm rates. It has significant application value in several fields
such as the segmentation and edge detection for SAR images.
关键词
合成孔径雷达图像边缘检测指数加权均值比非极大值抑制接收者操作特征曲线
Keywords
SAR imagesedge detectionROEWANon-Maximum Suppression(NMS)Receiver Operating Characteristic(ROC)
An C J, Xin Y L and Chen Z P. 2011. Edge detection algorithm for SAR image based on improved ROEWA. Journal of Image and Graphics, 16(8): 1483–1488
Bovik A C. 1988. On detecting edges in speckle imagery. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 36(10): 1618–1627
Canny J F. 1986. A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAMI-8(6): 679–698
Fjørtoft R, Lopès A, Marthon P and Cubero-Castan E. 1998. An optimal multiedge detector for SAR image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 36(3): 793–802
Jia C L and Kuang G Y. 2007. An improved edge detection algorithm for SAR images. Journal of Electronics and Information Technology, 29(2): 379–382
Lee J S. 1986. Speckle suppression and analysis for synthetic aperture radar images. Optical Engineering, 25(5): 636–643
Mason S J and Graham N E. 2002. Areas beneath the relative operating characteristics (ROC) and relative operating levels (ROL) curves: statistical significance and interpretation. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 128(584): 2145–2166
Paillou P. 1997. Detecting step edges in noisy SAR images: a new linear operator. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 35(1): 191–196
Wu Y H, Chen T Z and Shu Y. 2010. Road extraction from high resolution SAR images based on the directional ROEWA detector. Computer Engineering and Science, 32(8): 71–74
Yang D L, Lu C H, Zhang J L, Yang K and Chen X T. 2013. Edge detection in SAR images based on ROEWA and Hough transform. Journal of Electronic Measurement and Instrument, 27(6): 543–548
Zaman M R and Moloney C R. 1993. A comparison of adaptive filters for edge-preserving smoothing of speckle noise // Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Minneapolis, MN, USA: IEEE: 77–80 [DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP.1993.319751]