Hyperspectral anomaly change detection model based on independent component analysis

Yukun LIN; Nan WANG; Lifu ZHANG; Yi CEN; Xuejian SUN; Hanyu LU; Qingxi TONG

doi:10.11834/jrs.20198118

Views : 0 下载量: 608 CSCD: 2

PDF
Export
Share
Collection
Album

Hyperspectral anomaly change detection model based on independent component analysis
Vol. 23, Issue 6, Pages: 1167-1176(2019)
Received：20 March 2018，

Accepted：08 September 2018，

Published：2019-11
DOI： 10.11834/jrs.20198118
稿件说明：

移动端阅览

林昱坤, 王楠, 张立福, 岑奕, 孙雪剑, 卢涵宇, 童庆禧. 2019. 独立成分分析的高光谱异常变化检测. 遥感学报, 23(6): 1167–1176 DOI： 10.11834/jrs.20198118.

Lin Y K, Wang N, Zhang L F, Cen Y, Sun X J, Lu H Y and Tong Q X. 2019. Hyperspectral anomaly change detection model based on independent component analysis. Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(6): 1167–1176 DOI： 10.11834/jrs.20198118.

摘要

遥感探测到的小目标信号一般是弱信号，利用传统的高光谱异常变化检测方法直接抑制背景来突出异常变化目标，往往导致小目标弱信号同时被抑制，造成目标探测率低、虚警率高。基于独立成分分析方法，研究了弱信号小目标的高光谱变化检测模型，该模型首先通过投影寻踪将异常变化影像投影到独立成分，突出异常变化目标，然后再抑制背景，从而达到异常变化目标和背景的有效分离。该模型可以有效降低虚警率，提高探测率。利用模拟数据和真实数据进行了精度验证，结果表明，利用模拟数据得到的探测精度为99%，利用真实数据得到的检测精度为86%，与传统异常变化检测算法相比，精度最高提高了9%。本文研究方法适用于弱信号小目标的高光谱异常变化检测。

Abstract

Small target signals detected through remote sensing are typically weak signals. The traditional hyperspectral anomaly change detection method directly suppresses the background. However

it frequently causes small targets to be suppressed simultaneously

thereby resulting in a low target detection rate and a high false alarm rate. In this study

a hyperspectral anomaly change detection model based on independent component analysis is used. The proposed model is projected on an independent component

which first highlights the anomaly changes and then suppresses the background to achieve the effective separation of anomaly changes and background. This model can effectively reduce the false alarm rate and improve the detection rate. The accuracy is verified by simulation and real data. Results show that the detection accuracy is 99% using simulated data

and the detection accuracy is 86% using real data. The accuracy is increased by 9% in comparison with the traditional anomaly change detection algorithm. The proposed hyperspectral anomaly change detection method is suitable for processing weak targets. Remote sensing image change detection is the process of quantitatively analyzing the surface changes in remote sensing images that are not obtained in the same surface area simultaneously. However

change detection frequently fails to highlight the change in interest given the differences in atmospheric environment and radiation difference caused by various sensors. We aim to find the small changes that are rare and different from the overall background trend. Traditional hyperspectral anomaly detection methods are generally used to highlight abnormal changes by directly suppressing the background. However

the three methods mentioned above cannot effectively eliminate the radiation differences in the case of complex objects and cannot guarantee the consistency of the background. The background is difficult to suppress

and the anomaly changes cannot be highlighted. Abnormal change detection method based on Independent Component Analysis (ICA) through the abnormal changes in RX anomaly detection method of pixels selects the anomalies with strong changes in abnormal pixels for initial projection direction and to all pixels to initialize the orthogonal projection of projection direction and abnormal pixel labeling for a second projection direction until the number of iterations to achieve independent component. The visual discrimination results after joining LCRA anomaly change detection results effectively restrain the false alarm rates and highlight the anomaly change targets

and abnormal change detection obtains accurate results. The ICA results show that the accuracy of anomaly change detection is superior to other methods. The result shows the quantitative evaluation result of abnormal change detection. ICA realizes the highest accuracy. The ICA anomaly change detection method achieves a low false alarm rate and favorable detection effect

and this method can obtain the highest accuracy with or without the LCRA matching strategy. Considering the evident geometric matching error of real data

the accuracies of all methods improve by approximately 0.2 after the LCRA matching strategy is adopted. The result shows the corresponding accuracy of the ICA anomaly detection method for analyzing the number of different independent components. Moreover

the result accuracy of this method is the highest when the number of independent components is moderate and between 7 and 14

thereby reflecting its robustness. The accuracy of the proposed method is better than other methods when the parameter size is reasonable. This study presents an ICA model

which determines the abnormal changes in projection on an independent component and the prominent changes in the target and restrains the background to achieve the effective separation of target and background

effectively improve the detection rate

and achieve low false alarm rates. The conclusions are summarized as follows: (1)The proposed method that uses simulated data achieves abnormal change detection accuracy of 99% and real data detection accuracy of 86% in comparison with the traditional abnormal change detection algorithm

which accuracy reaches 9%; (2) Aiming at the abnormal change target of a subpixel level

the proposed method has a 1% improvement in accuracy in comparison with traditional abnormal change detection. (3) The proposed method has only one parameter

and the selection of parameters slightly impact accuracy

which has strong robustness.

关键词

Keywords

references

Acito N, Diani M, Rossi A and de Ceglie S U. 2014. Hyperspectral anomalous change detection in the presence of non-stationary atmospheric/illumination conditions//Proceedings of SPIE 9244, Image and Signal Processing for Remote Sensing XX. Amsterdam, Netherlands: SPIE [DOI: 10.1117/12.2067314]

Eismann M T, Meola J and Hardie R C. 2008. Hyperspectral change detection in the presenceof diurnal and seasonal variations. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 46(1): 237–249

Jin H and Ling C X. 2005. Using AUC and accuracy in evaluating learning algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 17(3): 299–310

Matteoli S, Diani M and Corsini G. 2010. A tutorial overview of anomaly detection in hyperspectral images. IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, 25(7): 5–28

彭波, 张立福, 张鹏, 邓贤明, 岑奕. 2017. Cholesky分解的逐像元实时高光谱异常探测. 遥感学报, 21(5): 739–748

Peng B, Zhang L F, Zhang P, Peng X M and Cen Y. 2017. Real-time sample-wise hyperspectral anomaly detection algorithm using Cholesky decomposition. Journal of Remote Sensing, 21(5): 739–748

Pieper M, Manolakis D, Cooley T, Brueggeman M, Weisner A and Jacobson J. 2015a. New insights and practical considerations in hyperspectral change detection//Proceedings of 2015 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS). Milan, Italy: IEEE: 4161-4164 [DOI: 10.1109/IGARSS.2015.7326742]

Pieper M, Manolakis D, Truslow E, Cooley T, Brueggeman M, Weisner A and Jacobson J. 2015b. Comparison of hyperspectral change detection algorithms//Proceedings of SPIE 9611, Imaging Spectrometry XX. San Diego, California, United States: SPIE [DOI: 10.1117/12.2188316]

Reed I S and Yu X. 1990. Adaptive multiple-band CFAR detection of an optical pattern with unknown spectral distribution. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 38(10): 1760–1770

Rossi A, Acito N, Diani M, Corsini G, De Ceglie S U, Riccobono A and Chiarantini L. 2014. Hyperspectral data collection for the assessment of target detection algorithms: the Viareggio 2013 trial//Proceedings of SPIE 9250, Electro-Optical Remote Sensing, Photonic Technologies, and Applications VIII; and Military Applications in Hyperspectral Imaging and High Spatial Resolution Sensing II. Amsterdam, Netherlands: SPIE [DOI: 10.1117/12.2067313]

Rotman S and Shalev H. 2017. Evaluating hyperspectral imaging change detection methods//Proceedings of 2017 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS). Fort Worth, TX, USA: IEEE: 1946-1949 [DOI: 10.1109/IGARSS.2017.8127360]

Schweizer S M and Moura J M F. 2000. Hyperspectral imagery: clutter adaptation in anomaly detection. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 46(5): 1855–1871

Singh A. 1989. Review article digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 10(6): 989–1003

Theiler J. 2008a. Quantitative comparison of quadratic covariance-based anomalous change detectors. Applied Optics, 47(28): F12–F26

Theiler J. 2008b. Subpixel anomalous change detection in remote sensing imagery//Proceedings of 2008 IEEE Southwest Symposium on Image Analysis and Interpretation. Santa Fe, NM, USA: IEEE: 165-168 [DOI: 10.1109/SSIAI.2008.4512311]

Theiler J and Matsekh A M. 2010. Total least squares for anomalous change detection//Proceedings of SPIE 7695, Algorithms and Technologies for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery XVI. Orlando, Florida, United States: SPIE [DOI: 10.1117/12.851935]

Theiler J and Perkins S. 2006. Proposed framework for anomalous change detection//Workshop on Machine Learning Algorithms for Surveillance and Event Detection at the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning. Los Alamos, NM: Los Alamos National Laboratory

Theiler J and Wohlberg B. 2012. Local coregistration adjustment for anomalous change detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50(8): 3107–3116

童庆禧, 张兵, 张立福. 2016. 中国高光谱遥感的前沿进展. 遥感学报, 20(5): 689–707

Tong Q X, Zhang B and Zhang L F. 2016. Current progress of hyperspectral remote sensing in China. Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(5): 689–707

Vongsy K, Karimkhan S, Shaw A K and Wicker D. 2007. Change detection for hyperspectral imagery//Proceedings of SPIE 6565, Algorithms and Technologies for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery XIII. Orlando, Florida, United States: SPIE [DOI: 10.1117/12.723161]

Vongsy K, Mendenhall M J, Hanna P M and Kaufman J. 2009. Change detection using synthetic hyperspectral imagery//Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing. Grenoble, France: IEEE: 1-6 [DOI: 10.1109/WHISPERS.2009.5289016]

Wang B, Choi S K, Han Y K, Lee S K and Choi J W. 2015. Application of IR-MAD using synthetically fused images for change detection in hyperspectral data. Remote Sensing Letters, 6(8): 578–586

Wang T, Du B and Zhang L P. 2013. A kernel-based target-constrained interference-minimized filter for hyperspectral sub-pixel target detection. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 6(2): 626–637

Wohlberg B and Theiler J. 2010. Symmetrized local co-registration optimization for anomalous change detection//Proceedings of SPIE 7533, Computational Imaging VIII. San Jose, California, United States: SPIE: 753307 [DOI: 10.1117/12.845210]

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

In-orbit application testing of 5 m Optical Satellite 02 （ZY1-02E）

Urban classification by multi-feature fusion of hyperspectral image and LiDAR data

Hyperspectral remote sensing image classification based on semi-supervised conditional random field

Hyperspectral image classification and application based on relevance vector machine

Relationship between Algal Chlorophyll Concentration and Spectral Reflectance of Inland Water