浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
Published： 07 March 2020 ，
扫 描 看 全 文
吴仪，邓孺孺，秦雁，王春梅，梁业恒，熊龙海.2020.秋冬季节珠三角典型区域气溶胶浓度垂直分布的激光雷达反演.遥感学报，24（3）： 302-318
Wu Y， Deng R R， Qin Y， Wang C M，Liang Y H and Xiong L H. 2020. Vertical distribution of aerosol mass concentration over Pearl River Delta observed by Lidar during autumn and winter. Journal of Remote Sensing（Chinese）， 24（3）： 302-318
气溶胶与全球热辐射平衡、水循环、人类健康密不可分，其观测精度直接影响天气预测、气候建模以及对人类健康影响评估的精度，激光雷达能监测气溶胶的垂直分布，对污染气溶胶的扩散趋势、污染源反演、气候预测等均有重要意义。本文基于激光在大气中的辐射传输过程，根据米散射激光雷达的工作原理，使用雷达的多个系统参数计算雷达常数，建立激光雷达气溶胶质量浓度反演模型，从地面向上在晴空条件下进行了珠三角地区典型区域的秋冬季节气溶胶垂直观测的实验，计算气溶胶质量浓度的垂直廓线，反演气溶胶的垂直分布情况。验证与分析结果表明：（1）激光雷达反演结果显示，白天的反演结果中噪声大大减少，表明反演算法能够有效减弱太阳光的影响。（2）相比于传统方法，使用雷达常数而非边界值的反演结果波动较小，更符合实际，能够有效避免高空噪声的影响。（3）高层大气在晴朗静稳天气状况下较为干净，气溶胶基本分布在低空区域，质量浓度随高度基本呈负指数分布。
This study aims to analyze the vertical distribution of aerosol particles during autumn and winter by deriving the number density of aerosol particles from Mie Lidar return signals. Haze has always existed in regions with low humidity and stable weather. In such regions
particle vertical distribution characters are needed for transport mechanisms. As a widely used instrument
Mie Lidar surfer from the uncertainties caused by the Lidar ratio and boundary value assumption. However
Mie Lidar is the most powerful tool to observe the atmospheric vertical distribution because it performs well in day and night under all weather conditions in comparison with passive sensors. Moreover
Mie Lidar is easier to carry compared with Raman Lidar.
Lidar radiation principles were studied to understand the Lidar equation and its solution. Several parameters were carefully chosen for the numerical solutions. Instead of using boundary value for approximation
the Lidar parameter k was directly calculated on the basis of Lidar-validated parameters to avoid uncertainties. Thus
aerosol particles backscatter and extinction coefficient were retrieved by solving the Lidar equation and integrated for Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) results. A Cimel CE318 sun photometer and an ASD FieldSpec3 were used to measure AOD as validation data. Lastly
the number density of aerosol particles was derived on the basis of Mie theory with the estimation of aerosol particle distribution
size
and refractive index of particles.
According to the number density vertical profile
nearly no difference was observed between the number density vertical profile of aerosol particles during daytime and nighttime in one day at a low altitude. This result indicated that the sunlight effect is ignorable for aerosol particle distribution near ground. The retrieved AODs with the CE318 and ASD observations showed a root mean square error of approximately 0.0541 and 0.0100
demonstrating that the retrieved result is reliable. The comparison with traditional method showed that the proposed algorithm in this study improved the accuracy of the traditional Lidar equation solution. The near-real distribution results showed aerosol particle distribution characteristics near the ground. The number density of aerosol particles in Guangzhou was mainly distributed in low-altitude regions
and its relationship with height was approximately a negative exponential distribution. The retrieved results of the aerosol particle number density were similar to those from the previous years
indicating that the air pollution in Guangzhou has not worsened. However
potential environmental threats and air pollution problems still need to be governed.
Several uncertainties
such as changes in air temperature and pressure
validation of Lidar instrument k
and overlap factor
that could cause deviation were identified. The overlap factor and molecular backscatter coefficient were carefully calculated using the theoretical method. Frequent updates on Lidar parameters will be requested from the Lidar company in the future. The theoretical and experimental methods were combined for the calculation of the overlap factor and molecular backscatter coefficient. Raman Lidar was used to measure the actual Lidar ratios and characteristics of molecular scatter.
The aerosol particle number density-retrieved algorithm was based on Lidar radiation principles and revealed the particles’ spatial distribution characters. The vertical distribution characters remained unchanged for several days under stable weather in the autumn and winter seasons
and its relationship with height was approximately a negative exponential distribution; hence
air conditions can have huge effect on human health. Air pollution problem still needs to be governed.
激光雷达辐射传输机理气溶胶颗粒物质量浓度珠三角地区
Mie LidarLidar radiation principlesaerosolaerosol particlesmass concentrationPearl River Delta
Andreae M O, Schmid O, Yang H, Chand D, Yu J Z, Zeng L M and Zhang Y H. 2008. Optical properties and chemical composition of the atmospheric aerosol in urban Guangzhou, China. Atmospheric Environment, 42(25): 6335-6350 [DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.030http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.030]
Bucholtz A. 1995. Rayleigh-scattering calculations for the terrestrial atmosphere. Applied Optics, 34(15): 2765-2773 [DOI: 10.1364/AO.34.002765http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.34.002765]
Chen Q D, Deng R R, Qin Y, He Y Q and Wang Y. 2011. Analysis of aerosol parameter by using the sun photometer during Guangzhou Asian Games. Tropical Geography, 31(5): 445-450
陈启东, 邓孺孺, 秦雁, 何颖清, 王盈. 2011. 基于太阳光度计的广州亚运期间气溶胶参数分析. 热带地理31(5): 445-450 [DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5221.2011.05.001http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-5221.2011.05.001]
Chen T, Wu D C, Liu B, Cao K F, Wang Z Z, Bo G Y, Yuan L and Zhou J. 2010. A new method for determining aerosol baekscatter coefficient boundary value in the lower troposphere. Acta Optica Sinica, 30(6): 1531-1536
陈涛, 吴德成, 刘博, 曹开法, 王珍珠, 伯广宇, 袁林, 周军. 2010. 低层大气中确定气溶胶后向散射系数边界值的新方法. 光学学报, 30(6): 1531-1536 [DOI: 10.3788/AOS20103006.1531http://dx.doi.org/10.3788/AOS20103006.1531]
Collis R T H and Russell P B. 1976. Lidar measurement of particles and gases by elastic backscattering and differential absorption//Hinkley E D, ed. Laser Monitoring of the Atmosphere. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer: 71-151 [DOI: 10.1007/3-540-07743-X_18http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-07743-X_18]
Dai H T, Liu J G, Lu J G, Wang J, Gui H Q and Wu D X. 2012. Characteristics of aerosol particle size distribution during Guangzhou Asian games and Paralympic games. Journal of Atmospheric and Environmental Optics, 7(1): 24-30
代海婷, 刘建国, 陆亦怀, 王杰, 桂华侨, 伍德侠. 2012. 广州亚运会及残运会期间大气细粒子谱特征分析. 大气与环境光学学报, 7(1): 24-30 [DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6141.2012.01.005http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-6141.2012.01.005]
Diner D J, Abdou W A, Bruegge C J, Conel J E, Crean K A, Gaitley B J, Helmlinger M C, Kahn R A, Martonchik J V, Pilorz S H and Holben B N. 2001. MISR aerosol optical depth retrievals over southern Africa during the SAFARI-2000 Dry Season Campaign. Geophysical Research Letters, 28(16): 3127-3130 [DOI: 10.1029/2001gl013188http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001gl013188]
Dubovik O and King M D. 2000. A flexible inversion algorithm for retrieval of aerosol optical properties from Sun and sky radiance measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 105(D16): 20673-20696 [DOI: 10.1029/2000JD900282http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900282]
Fernald F G. 1984. Analysis of atmospheric Lidar observations: some comments. Applied Optics, 23(5): 652-653 [DOI: 10.1364/AO.23.000652http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.23.000652]
Fernald F G, Herman B M and Reagan J A. 1972. Determination of aerosol height distributions by Lidar. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 11(3): 482-489 [DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1972)011<0482:DOAHDB>2.0.CO;2http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1972)011<0482:DOAHDB>2.0.CO;2]
Fujii T and Fukuchi T. 2005. Laser Remote Sensing. Boca Raton: CRC Press
Gao J, Zhou Y, Wang J, Wang T, and Wang W X. 2007. Inter-comparison of WPSTM-TEOMTM-MOUDITM and investigation on particle density, Environmental Science, 28(09): 1929-1934
高健，周杨，王进，王韬，王文兴. 2007. WPSTM-TEOMTM-MOUDITM的对比及大气气溶胶密度研究.环境科学，28(09): 1929-1934 [10.13227/j.hjkx.2007.09.016]
Han X B, Zhang G H, Bi X H, Wang X M, Sheng G Y and Fu J M. 2015. Pollution characteristics of atmospheric particle size and number concentrations during summer in urban area of Guangzhou. Research of Environmental Sciences, 28(2): 198-204
韩冰雪, 张国华, 毕新慧, 王新明, 盛国英, 傅家谟, 2015. 广州城区夏季大气颗粒物数浓度谱分布特征. 环境科学研究, 28(2): 198-204 [DOI: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2015.02.05http://dx.doi.org/10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2015.02.05]
He Q S, Geng F H, Li C C, Yang S Q, Wang Y Y, Mu H Z, Zhou G Q, Liu X B, Gao W, Cheng T T and Wu Z. 2018. Long-term characteristics of satellite-based PM2.5 over East China. Science of the Total Environment, 612: 1417-1423 [DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.027http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.027]
He Q S, Li C C, Geng F H, Zhou G Q, Gao W, Yu W, Li Z K and Du M B. 2016. A parameterization scheme of aerosol vertical distribution for surface-level visibility retrieval from satellite remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 181: 1-13 [DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2016.03.016http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.03.016]
He Q S, Li C C, Mao J T, Lau A K H and Chu D A. 2008. Analysis of aerosol vertical distribution and variability in Hong Kong. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 113(D14): D14211 [DOI: 10.1029/2008JD009778http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009778]
Herman M, Deuzé J L, Devaux C, Goloub P, Breon F M and Tanré D. 1997. Remote sensing of aerosols over land surfaces including polarization measurements and application to POLDER measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 102(D14): 17039-17049 [DOI: 10.1029/96jd02109http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/96jd02109]
Hsu N C, Jeong M J, Bettenhausen C, Sayer A M, Hansell R, Seftor C S, Huang J and Tsay S C. 2013. Enhanced deep blue aerosol retrieval algorithm: the second generation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 118(16): 9296-9315 [DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50712http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50712]
Hsu N C, Lee J, Sayer A M, Carletta N, Chen S H, Tucker C J, Holben B N and Tsay S C. 2017. Retrieving near-global aerosol loading over land and ocean from AVHRR. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 122(18): 9968-9989 [DOI: 10.1002/2017jd026932http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2017jd026932]
Hsu N C, Tsay S C, King M D and Herman J R. 2006. Deep blue retrievals of Asian aerosol properties during ACE-Asia. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 44(11): 3180-3195 [DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2006.879540http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2006.879540]
Huang Z Z, Wang J, Liu J G, Gui H Q, Wu D X and Li T. 2012. The analysis of the characterization of fine particle size distribution in urban area of Guangzhou. China Environmental Science, 32(7): 1177-1181
黄祖照, 王杰, 刘建国, 桂华侨, 伍德侠, 李铁. 2012. 广州城区大气细颗粒物粒谱分布特征分析. 中国环境科学, 32(7): 1177-1181 [DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2012.07.005http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2012.07.005]
Jose S, Niranjan K, Gharai B, Rao P V N and Nair V S. 2016. Characterisation of absorbing aerosols using ground and satellite data at an urban location, Hyderabad. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 16(6): 1427-1440 [DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2014.09.0220http://dx.doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2014.09.0220]
Kaufman Y J, Tanré D, Remer L A, Vermote E F, Chu A and Holben B N. 1997. Operational remote sensing of tropospheric aerosol over land from EOS Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 102(D14): 17051-17067 [DOI: 10.1029/96jd03988http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/96jd03988]
Klett J D. 1985. Lidar inversion with variable backscatter/extinction ratios. Applied Optics, 24(11): 1638-1643 [DOI: 10.1364/AO.24.001638http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.24.001638]
Lee J, Hsu N C, Sayer A M, Bettenhausen C and Yang P. 2017. AERONET-based nonspherical dust optical models and effects on the VIIRS deep blue/SOAR over water aerosol product. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 122(19): 10384-10401 [DOI: 10.1002/2017jd027258http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2017jd027258]
Li Z Q, Xie Y S, Zhang Y, Li L, Xu H, Li K T and Li D H. 2019. Advance in the remote sensing of atmospheric aerosol composition. Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(3): 359–373
李正强， 谢一凇， 张莹， 李雷, 许华, 李凯涛, 李东辉. 大气气溶胶成分遥感研究进展. 遥感学报， 2019， 23(03)：359-373[DOI:10.11834/jrs.20198185http://dx.doi.org/10.11834/jrs.20198185]
Li Z Q，Xu H，Zhang Y，Zhang Y H，Chen C，Li D H，Li L，Hou W Z，Lyu Y and Gu X F． 2013． Joint use of active and passive remote sensing for monitoring of severe haze pollution in Beijing 2013． Journal of Remote Sensing，1 7(4): 919-928
李正强， 许华， 张莹， 张玉环, 陈澄, 李东辉, 李莉, 侯伟真, 吕阳, 顾行发. 北京区域2013严重灰霾污染的主被动遥感监测. 遥感学报， 2013, 17(04):919-928 DOI: 10.11834 /jrs.2013306http://dx.doi.org/10.11834/jrs.2013306］
Liang Y. 2009. Research for Visibility Detection by Small Lidar and Inversion Algorithm. Tianjin: Civil Aviation University of China
梁郁. 2009. 小型能见度激光雷达系统设计和反演算法研究. 天津: 中国民航大学
Müller D, Ansmann A, Mattis I, Tesche M, Wandinger U, Althausen D and Pisani G. 2007. Aerosol-type-dependent Lidar ratios observed with Raman Lidar. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 112(D16): D16202 [DOI: 10.1029/2006jd008292http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006jd008292]
Omar A H, Winker D M, Kittaka C, Vaughan M A, Liu Z Y, Hu Y X, Trepte C R, Rogers R R, Ferrare R A, Lee K P, Kuehn R E and Hostetler C A. 2009. The CALIPSO automated aerosol classification and Lidar ratio selection algorithm. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 26(10): 1994-2014 [DOI: 10.1175/2009jtecha1231.1http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2009jtecha1231.1]
Omar A H, Won J G, Winker D M, Yoon S C, Dubovik O and McCormick M P. 2005. Development of global aerosol models using cluster analysis of Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 110(D10): D10S14 [DOI: 10.1029/2004jd004874http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004jd004874]
Pepijn Veefkind J and De Leeuw G. 1998. A new algorithm to determine the spectral aerosol optical depth from satellite radiometer measurements. Journal of Aerosol Science, 29(10): 1237-1248 [DOI: 10.1016/S0021-8502(98)00032-9http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(98)00032-9]
Pettit E. 1951. The sun and stellar radiation in Astrophysics. New York: McGraw-Hill: 703
Reid J S, Lagrosas N D, Jonsson H H, Reid E A, Atwood S A, Boyd T J, Ghate V P, Xian P, Posselt D J, Simpas J B, Uy S N, Zaiger K, Blake D R, Bucholtz A, Campbell J R, Chew B N, Cliff S S, Holben B N, Holz R E, Hyer E J, Kreidenweis S M, Kuciauskas A P, Lolli S, Oo M, Perry K D, Salinas S V, Sessions W R, Smirnov A, Walker A L, Wang Q, Yu L Y, Zhang J L and Zhao Y J. 2016. Aerosol meteorology of Maritime Continent for the 2012 7SEAS southwest monsoon intensive study-Part 2: philippine receptor observations of fine-scale aerosol behavior, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 16(22): 14057-14078 [DOI: 10.5194/acp-16-14057-2016http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14057-2016]
Rose D, Gunthe S S, Su H, Garland R M, Yang H, Berghof M, Cheng Y F, Wehner B, Achtert P, Nowak A, Wiedensohler A, Takegawa N, Kondo Y, Hu M, Zhang Y, Andreae M O and Pöschl U. 2011. Cloud condensation nuclei in polluted air and biomass burning smoke near the mega-city Guangzhou, China - Part 2: size-resolved aerosol chemical composition, diurnal cycles, and externally mixed weakly CCN-active soot particles. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 11(6): 2817-2836 [DOI: 10.5194/acp-11-2817-2011http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-2817-2011]
Sayer A M, Hsu N C, Bettenhausen C, Lee J, Redemann J, Schmid B and Shinozuka Y. 2016. Extending "Deep Blue" aerosol retrieval coverage to cases of absorbing aerosols above clouds: sensitivity analysis and first case studies. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 121(9): 4830-4854 [DOI: 10.1002/2015jd024729http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015jd024729]
Sayer A M, Hsu N C, Lee J, Carletta N, Chen S H and Smirnov A. 2017. Evaluation of NASA Deep Blue/SOAR aerosol retrieval algorithms applied to AVHRR measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 122(18): 9945-9967 [DOI: 10.1002/2017jd026934http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2017jd026934]
Shi G Y. 2007. Atmospheric Radiology. Beijing: Science Press: 48, 120-123, 129-130
石广玉. 2007. 大气辐射学. 北京: 科学出版社: 48, 120-123, 129-130
Solomon P A, Costantini M, Grahame T J, Gerlofs-Nijland M E, Cassee F R, Russell A G, Brook J R, Hopke P K, Hidy G, Phalen R F, Saldiva P, Sarnat S E, Balmes J R, Tager I B, Özkaynak H, Vedal S, Wierman S S G and Costa D L. 2012. Air pollution and health: bridging the gap from sources to health outcomes: conference summary. Air Quality, Atmosphere and Health, 5(1): 9-62 [DOI: 10.1007/s11869-011-0161-4http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11869-011-0161-4]
Tanré D, Kaufman Y J, Herman M and Mattoo S. 1997. Remote sensing of aerosol properties over oceans using the MODIS/EOS spectral radiances. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 102(D14): 16971-16988 [DOI: 10.1029/96jd03437http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/96jd03437]
Vaughan M A, Powell K A, Kuehn R E, Young S A, Winker D M, Hostetler C A, Hunt W H, Liu Z Y, McGill M J and Getzewich B J. 2009. Fully automated detection of cloud and aerosol layers in the CALIPSO Lidar measurements. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 26(10): 2034-2050 [DOI: 10.1175/2009jtecha1228.1http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2009jtecha1228.1]
Veefkind J P, Aben I, McMullan K, Förster H, De Vries J, Otter G, Claas J, Eskes H J, De Haan J F, Kleipool Q, Van Weele M, Hasekamp O, Hoogeveen R, Landgraf J, Snel R, Tol P, Ingmann P, Voors R, Kruizinga B, Vink R, Visser H and Levelt P F. 2012. TROPOMI on the ESA Sentinel-5 Precursor: a GMES mission for global observations of the atmospheric composition for climate, air quality and ozone layer applications. Remote Sensing of Environment, 120: 70-83 [DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.09.027http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.09.027]
Winker D M, Pelon J, Coakley Jr J A, Ackerman S A, Charlson R J, Colarco P R, Flamant P, Fu Q, Hoff R M, Kittaka C, Kubar T L, Le Treut H, McCormick M P, Mégie G, Poole L, Powell K, Trepte C, Vaughan M A and Wielicki B A. 2010. The CALIPSO MISSION: a global 3D view of aerosols and clouds. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 91(9): 1211-1229 [DOI: 10.1175/2010bams3009.1http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2010bams3009.1]
Xu D. 2015. Scattering Characteristics of Irregular Air Particles and Remote Sensing Od Particle Concentration. Guangzhou: Sun Yat-Sen University
徐丹. 2015. 大气不规则颗粒散射特征及颗粒物浓度遥感反演. 广州: 中山大学
Xu D, Deng R R, Chen Q D, Qin Y and Liang Y H. 2015. Aerosol size distribution in Guangzhou based on the CE318 data. Tropical Geography, 35(1): 12-20
徐丹, 邓孺孺, 陈启东, 秦雁, 梁业恒. 2015. 基于CE318观测的广州市气溶胶粒子谱分布特征. 热带地理, 35(1): 13-20 [DOI: 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.002659http://dx.doi.org/10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.002659]
Young D E, Kim H, Parworth C, Zhou S, Zhang X L, Cappa C D, Seco R, Kim S and Zhang Q. 2016. Influences of emission sources and meteorology on aerosol chemistry in a polluted urban environment: results from DISCOVER-AQ California. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 16(8): 5427-5451 [DOI: 10.5194/acp-16-5427-2016http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5427-2016]
Young S A and Vaughan M A. 2009. The retrieval of profiles of particulate extinction from cloud-aerosol Lidar infrared pathfinder satellite observations (CALIPSO) data: algorithm description. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 26(6): 1105-1119 [DOI: 10.1175/2008JTECHA1221.1http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2008JTECHA1221.1]
Zhang K Q, Ma Y J, Xin J Y, Liu Z R, Ma Y N, Gao D D, Wu J S, Zhang W Y, Wang Y S and Shen P K. 2018. The aerosol optical properties and PM2.5 components over the world’s largest industrial zone in Tangshan, North China. Atmospheric Research, 201: 226-234 [DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.10.025http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.10.025]
Zhang T. 2010. Research on Size Distribution and Chemical Composition of Fine Particles and Their Impact on Visibility in Urban Guangzhou. Guangzhou: Jinan University
张涛. 2010. 广州大气细粒子粒径分布和化学成分对能见度影响的研究. 广州: 暨南大学
Zhang W C，Zhang Y，Lv Y，Li K T and Li Z Q． 2013． Observation of atmospheric boundary layer height by ground-based LiDAＲ during haze days． Journal of Ｒemote Sensing，1 7( 4) : 981 －992
张婉春，张莹，吕阳，李凯涛，李正强. 2013. 利用激光雷达探测灰霾天气大气边界层高度. 遥感学报，17(4) : 981-99［DOI: 10.11834 /jrs.20133075http://dx.doi.org/10.11834/jrs.20133075］
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621