浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
纸质出版日期： 2021-04-07 ，
扫 描 看 全 文
郑超磊，胡光成，陈琪婷，贾立.2021.遥感土壤水分对蒸散发估算的影响.遥感学报，25（4）： 990-999
Zheng C L，Hu G C，Chen Q T and Jia L. 2021. Impact of remote sensing soil moisture on the evapotranspiration estimation. National Remote Sensing Bulletin， 25（4）：990-999
地表实际蒸散发是联系陆表水循环、能量平衡和碳收支等物理过程的重要生态水文变量，同时也是目前水循环研究中的薄弱点，定量化土壤水分对蒸散发的胁迫作用是估算地表蒸散发的一个关键过程和难点。本研究基于2018年9月闪电河流域水循环与能量平衡遥感综合试验星—机—地联合观测数据，采用机载观测和卫星遥感反演土壤水分输入到ETMonitor模型估算地表实际蒸散发，在时间和空间两个维度上评估不同土壤水分产品对蒸散发估算的影响。从时间变化上来说，与地面观测蒸散发时间序列相比，基于ESA CCI （European Space Agency Climate Change Initiative）融合土壤水分产品、SMAP （Soil Moisture Active and Passive）土壤水分产品和国产风云三号气象卫星（FY-3C）土壤水分产品估算的蒸散发最接近地面站点观测蒸散发，而基于ASCAT（The Advanced Scatterometer）和SMOS （Soil Moisture Ocean Salinity） 土壤水分估算蒸散发分别明显的高于和低于地面观测蒸散发。从空间分布上来说，利用卫星反演土壤水分估算的蒸散发与基于机载观测土壤水分估算蒸散发具有一致的空间分布，能较好地反映该区域地表蒸散的空间分布格局，其中基于SMAP和SMOS土壤水分估算蒸散发与基于机载观测土壤水分估算蒸散发空间一致性最好。本研究评估遥感反演土壤水分对蒸散发影响，对区域及全球遥感蒸散发估算和土壤水分产品评估具有一定的指导意义。
The actual EvapoTranspiration (ET) is an important ecohydrological process that links the land surface water cycle
energy balance
and carbon budget
and it remains as one of the most uncertainty process in the global water cycle research. One key point to obtain accurate ET is soil water stress
which is also one of the most difficult points. Hence
the current study is proposed to study the impact of soil moisture on the ET estimation
considering the large uncertainty of satellite remote sensing soil moisture products.
In the current study
six satellite remote sensing soil moisture products were collected and downscaled to 1 km resolution
including SMAP (Soil Moisture Active and Passive)
SMOS (Soil Moisture Ocean Salinity)
ASCAT (The Advanced Scatterometer)
FY-3B and FY-3C (Chinese Feng Yun satellite 3 B and 3 C)
and ESA CCI (European Space Agency Climate Change Initiative). All soil moisture data were input to ETMonitor algorithm to obtain the corresponding ET estimation. The ETMonitor model has been proven to be able to generate accurate regional and global ET estimation
and the surface soil moisture data derived by microwave remote sensing is set as an important input for the ETMonitor model to estimate the surface resistance to account the constraining of soil moisture on ET. Meanwhile
to validate the satellite remote sensing soil moisture and corresponding ET estimation
we collected the ground observation-based ET and soil moisture data and the airborne observation-based soil moisture in September of 2018 based on the Comprehensive Remote Sensing Experiment of Water Cycle and Energy Balance in the Shandian River Basin. The daily observed ET is calculated by the 30-min latent heat flux obtained by an installed close-path eddy covariance system.
The satellite remote sensing soil moisture and ET time series were compared with the ground observation during September 2018 to illustrate their accuracy to reflect their temporal variations. It’s found that the Chinese FY-3C soil moisture data shows the highest correlation with the ground observation
while SMAP soil moisture data shows the lowest root mean square error with the ground observation. The ASCAT data overestimates the soil moisture significantly
while SMOS underestimates the soil moisture. Hence
the ET estimated based on ASCAT soil moisture data also overestimates ET significantly
and ET estimated based on SMOS tend to underestimate ET. It’s also noted that ET estimated based on Chinese FY-3C soil moisture
ESA CCI combined soil moisture
and SMAP soil moisture show the highest correlation and lowest root mean square error when comparing with ground observation. While the accuracies of ET estimated based on SMOS and ASCAT soil moisture products are lower based on their relatively large bias. The error of soil moisture is not linearly propagated to estimated ET. When the soil moisture is higher
e.g. higher than the field capacity
soil moisture does not stress the ET progress anymore
and the overestimation of soil moisture will not be propagated to the estimated ET.
The spatial variations of satellite remote sensing soil moisture after downscaling were compared with the airborne soil moisture
and general good correlation could be found among them. And ET estimated based on SMAP showed the highest correlation with ET estimated based on airborne soil moisture. Generally
all the satellite remote sensing soil moisture products are higher than the airborne soil moisture except SMOS
which is lower than the airborne soil moisture when soil moisture is high. Hence the ET values estimated based on satellite remote sensing soil moisture products are also higher than the ET estimated based on airborne soil moisture expect for the ET estimated based on SMOS.
Overall
the current study contributed to assess the uncertainty of satellite remote sensing soil moisture products and how it is propagated to the estimated ET. And it could also guide to obtain accurate regional and global ET products.
蒸散发土壤水分机载试验闪电河流域ETMonitor
evapotranspirationsoil moistureairborne measurementShandian river basinETMonitor
Bastiaanssen W G M, Menenti M, Feddes R A and Holtslag A A M. 1998. A remote sensing surface energy balance algorithm for land (SEBAL): 1. Formulation. Journal of Hydrology, 212(1-4): 198-212 [DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00253-4http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00253-4]
Chen Q T, Jia L, Menenti M, Hutjes R, Hu G C, Zheng C L, Wang K. 2019. A Numerical Analysis of Aggregation Error in Evapotranspiration Estimates Due to Heterogeneity of Soil Moisture and Leaf Area Index. Agriculture and Forest Meteorology, 269-270, 335-350 [DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.02.017http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.02.017]
Colliander A, Jackson T J, Bindlish R, Chan S, Das N, Kim S B, Cosh M H, Dunbar R S, Dang L, Pashaian L, Asanuma J, Aida K, Berg A, Rowlandson T, Bosch D, Caldwell T, Caylor K, Goodrich D, Jassar H, Lopez-Baeza E, Martínez-Fernández J, González-Zamora A, Livingston S, McNairn H, Pacheco Alfredo, Moghaddam Majid, Montzka Carsten, Notarnicola C, Niedrist G, Pellarin Thierry, Prueger J, Pulliainen J, Rautiainen K, Ramos Feliciano J, Seyfried M, Starks P, Su Zhongqing, Zeng Y, van der Velde R, Thibeault M, Dorigo W, Vreugdenhil Mariette, Walker JP, Wu X, Monerris A, O'Neill P E, Entekhabi D, Njoku Eni G, Yueh S. 2017. Validation of SMAP surface soil moisture products with core validation sites. Remote Sensing of Environment, 191: 215-231 [DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.01.021http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.01.021]
Dorigo W A, Wagner W, Albergel C, Albrecht F, Balsamo G, Brocca L, Chung D, Ertl M, Forkel M, Gruber A, Haas E, Hamer P D, Hirschi M, Ikonen J, de Jeu R, Kidd R, Lahoz W, Liu Y Y, Miralles D, Mistelbauer T, Nicolai-Shaw N, Parinussa R, Pratola C, Reimer C, van der Schalie R, Seneviratne S I Smolander T, Lecomte P. 2017. ESA CCI Soil Moisture for improved Earth system understanding: State-of-the art and future directions. Remote Sensing of Environment, 203:185-215 [DOI:10.1016/j.rse.2017.07.001http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.07.001]
Fernandez-Moran R, Al-Yaari A , Mialon A , Mahmoodi A , Al Bitar A , De Lannoy G, Lopez-Baeza E, Kerr Y, Wigneron J-P. 2017. SMOS-IC: An alternative SMOS soil moisture and vegetation optical depth product. Remote Sensing, 9:457 [DOI: 10.3390/rs9050457http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs9050457]
Gao Y, Long D. 2008. Progress in models for evapotranspiration estimation using remotely sensed data. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 3: 515-528
高彦春，龙笛. 2008. 遥感蒸散发模型研究进展. 遥感学报, 3: 515-528
Hu G C, Jia L. 2015. Monitoring of evapotranspiration in a semi-arid inland river basin by combining microwave and optical remote sensing observations. Remote Sensing, 7(3): 3056-3087 [DOI: 10.3390/rs70303056http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs70303056]
Jia L. 2004. Modeling heat exchanges at the land-atmosphere interface using multi-angular thermal infrared measurements. Wageningen University Dissertation: 49-68 [ISBN: 9085040418]
Jia L, Zheng C, Hu GC, and Menenti M. 2018. 4.03-Evapotranspiration. Comprehensive Remote Sensing. Oxford, Elsevier: 25-50 [DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.10353-7http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.10353-7]
Li Z L, Tang R L, Wan Z M, Bi Y Y, Zhou C H, Tang B H, Yan G J and Zhang X Y. 2009. A review of current methodologies for regional evapotranspiration estimation from remotely sensed data. Sensors, 9(5): 3801-3853 [DOI: 10.3390/s90503801http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s90503801]
Mu Q Z, Heinsch F A, Zhao M S and Running S W. 2007. Development of a global evapotranspiration algorithm based on MODIS and global meteorology data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 111(4): 519–536 [DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2007.04.015http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2007.04.015]
Mu Q Z, Zhao M S and Running S W. 2011. Improvements to a MODIS global terrestrial evapotranspiration algorithm. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115(8): 1781-1800 [DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.02.019http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.02.019]
Norman J M, Kustas W P and Humes K S. 1995. Source approach for estimating soil and vegetation energy fluxes in observations of directional radiometric surface temperature. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 77(3-4): 263-293 [DOI: 10.1016/0168-1923(95)02265-Yhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(95)02265-Y]
Song L, Yi Y, Wu S. 2012. Advancements of the Metrics of Evapotranspiration. Progress in Geography, 31(09):1186-1195
宋璐璐,尹云鹤,吴绍洪. 2012. 蒸散发测定方法研究进展.地理科学进展, 31(09):1186-1195
Su Z. 2002. The Surface Energy Balance System (SEBS) for estimation of turbulent heat fluxes. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 6(1): 85–99 [DOI: 10.5194/hess-6-85-2002http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-6-85-2002]
Tang R L, Li Z L and Tang B H. 2010. An application of the Ts-VI triangle method with enhanced edges determination for evapotranspiration estimation from MODIS data in arid and semi-arid regions: Implementation and validation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114(3): 540–551 [DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2009.10.012http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.10.012]
Wagner W, Lemoine G, Rott H. 1999. A Method for Estimating Soil Moisture from ERS Scatterometer and Soil Data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 70: 191-207. [DOI: 10.1016/S0034-4257(99)00036-Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(99)00036-X]
Wen F, Zhao W, Wang Q, and Sanchez N. 2020. A Value-Consistent Method for Downscaling SMAP Passive Soil Moisture With MODIS Products Using Self-Adaptive Window. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 58(2): 913-924. [DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2019.2941696http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2019.2941696]
Wen F, Zhao W, Hu L, Xu X, Cui Q. 2021. SMAP passive microwave soil moisture spatial downscaling based on optical remote sensing data-a case study in Shandian river basin. Journal of Remote Sensing, under review. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 25(4): 962-973
文凤平, 赵伟, 胡路, 徐红新, 崔倩. 2021. 耦合MODIS数据的SMAP被动微波土壤水分空间降尺度研究—以闪电河流域为例. 遥感学报, 25(4): 962-973
Zhao T J,Shi J C,Xu H X,Sun Y L,Chen D Q,Cui Q,Jia L,Huang S,Niu S D,Li X W,Yan G J,Chen L F,Liu Q H,Zhao K,Zheng X M,Zhao L M,Zheng C L,Ji D B,Xiong C,Wang T X,Li R,Pan J M,Wen J G,Mu X H,Yu C,Zheng Y M,Jiang L M,Chai L N,Lu H,Yao P P,Ma J W,Lv H S,Wu J J,Zhao W,Yang N,Guo P,Li Y X,Hu L,Geng D Y,Zhang Z Q,Hu J F and Du A P. 2021. Comprehensive remote sensing experiment of water cycle and energy balance in the Shandian river basin. National Remote Sensing Bulletin， 25(4):871-887
赵天杰,施建成,徐红新,孙彦龙,陈德清,崔倩,贾立,黄硕,牛升达,李秀伟,阎广建,陈良富,柳钦火,赵凯,郑兴明,赵利民,郑超磊,姬大彬,熊川,王天星,李睿,潘金梅,闻建光,穆西晗,余超,郑姚闽,蒋玲梅,柴琳娜,卢麾,姚盼盼,马建威,吕海深,武建军,赵伟,杨娜,郭鹏,李玉霞,胡路,耿德源,张子谦,胡建峰,杜爱萍.2021.闪电河流域水循环和能量平衡遥感综合试验.遥感学报,25(4): 871-887 [DOI：10.11834/jrs.20219401http://dx.doi.org/10.11834/jrs.20219401]
Zhao T, Shi J, Lv L, Xu H, Chen D, Cui Q, Jackson T., Yan G, Jia L, Chen L, Zhao K, Zheng X, Zhao L, Zheng C, Ji D, Xiong C, Wang T, Li R, Pan J, Wen J, Yu C, Zheng Y, Jiang L, Chai L, Lu H, Yao P, Ma J, Lv H, Wu J, Zhao W, Yang N, Guo P, Li Y, Hu L, Geng D, Zhang Z. 2020. Soil moisture experiment in the Luan River supporting new satellite mission opportunities, Remote Sensing of Environment, 240: 111680 [DOI:10.1016/j.rse.2020.111680http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111680]
Zhang X, Liu L, Chen X, Xie S, Gao Y. 2019. Fine Land-Cover Mapping in China Using Landsat Datacube and an Operational SPECLib-Based Approach. Remote Sensing 11: 1056 [DOI: 10.3390/rs11091056http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs11091056]
Zheng C L, Jia L, Hu G C and Lu J. 2019. Earth observations-based evapotranspiration in northeastern Thailand. Remote Sensing, 11(2): 138 [DOI: 10.3390/rs11020138http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs11020138]
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621