多尺度山地植被总初级生产力遥感估算中的误差来源解析

谢馨瑶; 李爱农; 田洁; 邬昌林

doi:10.11834/jrs.20243038

浏览量 : 0 下载量: 0 CSCD: 0 更多指标

R-PDF
PDF
导出
分享
收藏
专辑

多尺度山地植被总初级生产力遥感估算中的误差来源解析
Analysis of error sources in the multi-scale remote sensing estimation of mountain vegetation gross primary productivity
2024年页码：1-16
网络出版日期： 2024-04-01 ，
DOI： 10.11834/jrs.20243038

扫描看全文

谢馨瑶，李爱农，田洁，邬昌林.XXXX.多尺度山地植被总初级生产力遥感估算中的误差来源解析.遥感学报，XX（XX）： 1-16

Xie Xinyao，Li Ainong，Tian Jie，Wu Changlin. XXXX. Analysis of error sources in the multi-scale remote sensing estimation of mountain vegetation gross primary productivity. National Remote Sensing Bulletin， XX（XX）：1-16
谢馨瑶，李爱农，田洁，邬昌林.XXXX.多尺度山地植被总初级生产力遥感估算中的误差来源解析.遥感学报，XX（XX）： 1-16 DOI： 10.11834/jrs.20243038.

Xie Xinyao，Li Ainong，Tian Jie，Wu Changlin. XXXX. Analysis of error sources in the multi-scale remote sensing estimation of mountain vegetation gross primary productivity. National Remote Sensing Bulletin， XX（XX）：1-16 DOI： 10.11834/jrs.20243038.

摘要

山地生态系统是陆地重要的贮碳库，准确估算山地植被总初级生产力（Gross Primary Productivity，GPP）可进一步认知陆地植被对全球气候变化的反馈作用。然而，现有植被GPP遥感产品常常忽略了地形对光合作用过程的控制作用和亚像元空间异质性，分别导致了“地形误差”和“空间尺度误差”。本文以四川王朗国家级自然保护区为例，重点解析高（30 m）、中（480 m）、低（960 m）空间分辨率山地植被GPP遥感估算中的误差来源。结果表明，不同地形条件模拟下的多尺度植被GPP呈现出明显的空间差异（区域均值差距高达198

gC m

-2

-1

），说明忽略山地环境的特殊性将对GPP遥感估算结果造成较大偏差。植被GPP遥感估算地形误差随着空间分辨率的降低呈现减小的趋势，高空间分辨率下的地形误差不容忽视（区域偏差高达200

gC m

-2

-1

）。其中，未考虑水分重分配导致山地植被GPP空间分布存在较大不确定性（均方根误差为402

gC m

-2

-1

），因此土壤水分模拟精度的提升将有助于进一步改善山地高空间分辨率植被GPP遥感产品。从植被GPP遥感估算空间尺度误差的角度来说，研究发现其随着空间分辨率的降低呈现增大的趋势，中、低空间分辨率下的尺度误差均不容忽视（分别为161和210

gC m

-2

-1

）。本文建议在多尺度山地植被GPP遥感估算中，高空间分辨率产品应该重点关注地形效应，中、低空间分辨率产品应该进一步消除空间尺度误差。研究结果可为生产山地植被GPP遥感产品提供有益认知，丰富山地定量遥感理论体系，助力“双碳”目标。

Abstract

Objective Mountain ecosystems with coverage of approximately 24% of the terrestrial surface，are the key component of earth’s carbon cycle in terrestrial ecosystems. Vegetation in mountain ecosystems can regulate the energy budget via mediating the exchange of energy and substance

and thus has been regarded as an essential bio-indicator for the global climate change over the past decades. Accurate estimation of mountain vegetation gross primary productivity (GPP) plays a vital role in understanding the function of mountain ecosystems and characterizes the ecosystem responses to climate change. Due to the effect of complex mountainous conditions and the limitations from the spatial resolutions

there are obvious topographic errors and spatial scaling errors in mountain vegetation GPP estimates. Thus

it is crucial to evaluate the error sources in estimating mountain vegetation GPP across multiple spatial scales.Method In this paper

we selected the Wanglang National Nature Reserve - a typical mountainous ecosystem of southwest China as the study area. This study used an eco-hydrological model called Boreal Ecosystem Productivity Simulator (BEPS)-TerrainLab to obtain the vegetation GPP and analyze the topographic errors and spatial scaling errors at the fine

medium

and coarse spatial scales (i.e.

30 m

480 m

and 960 m). At the fine

medium

and coarse spatial scales

the topographic errors in estimating vegetation GPP were evaluated across four scenarios that characterize the effects of different topographic features. Spatial scaling errors were illustrated at the scales of 480 m and 960 m

respectively. Finally

the agreement index (

)

determination coefficient (

)

root mean square error (

RMSE

)

and mean bias error (

MBE

) were used to evaluate the topographic errors and spatial scaling errors in modeling mountain vegetation GPP at the fine

medium

and coarse spatial scales.Result Results showed that the multi-scale vegetation GPP estimates across different simulation conditions presented obvious spatial differences (the difference among regional mean value upped to 198

gC m

-2

-1

). The topographic errors of vegetation GPP estimates showed a decreasing trend with the decrease of spatial resolution

suggestting that more attention should be paid to high spatial resolution (the

MBE

value is 200

gC m

-2

-1

). Specifically

the error caused by ignoring the redistribution of soil water was observed to be the largest source of topographic errors. As for the spatial scaling errors

an increasing trend with the decrease of spatial resolution was found

highlight the necessity of reducing the spatial scaling errors in middle and coarse spatial resolution GPP estimates (161 and 210

gC m

-2

-1

).Conclusion During the process of generating the multi-scale mountain vegetation GPP products

it was necessary to remove the topographic effects on high spatial resolution GPP estimation. Simultaneously

attention should also be given to the spatial scaling errors of GPP products at middle and coarse spatial resolutions. Considering the obvious topographic errors caused by ignoring the water redistribution

accurate estimation of soil moisture would improve the quality of GPP products over mountainous areas

especially these products at high spatial resolution.

关键词

植被总初级生产力山地生态系统多尺度地形误差空间尺度误差

Keywords

Gross primary productivitymountain ecosystemsmultiple spatial scalestopographic errorsspatial scaling errors

references

Ahl D E, Gower S T, Mackay D S, Burrows S N, Norman J M and Diak G R. 2005. The effects of aggregated land cover data on estimating NPP in northern Wisconsin. Remote Sensing of Environment, 97(1): 1-14. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2005.02.016http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2005.02.016]

Ambroise B. 1995. TOPOGRAPHY AND THE WATER CYCLE IN A TEMPERATE MIDDLE MOUNTAIN ENVIRONMENT - THE NEED FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY EXPERIMENTS. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 73(3-4): 217-35. [DOI: 10.1016/0168-1923(94)05076-ihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(94)05076-i]

Araya Y N, Silvertown J, Gowing D J, McConway K J, Linder H P and Midgley G. 2011. A fundamental, eco-hydrological basis for niche segregation in plant communities. New Phytologist, 189(1): 253-8. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03475.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03475.x]

Aubinet M, Grelle A, Ibrom A, Rannik U, Moncrieff J, Foken T, Kowalski A S, Martin P H, Berbigier P, Bernhofer C, Clement R, Elbers J, Granier A, Grunwald T, Morgenstern K, Pilegaard K, Rebmann C, Snijders W, Valentini R and Vesala T. 2000. Estimates of the annual net carbon and water exchange of forests: The EUROFLUX methodology. Advances in Ecological Research. SAN DIEGO: ELSEVIER: 113-75

Badgley G, Anderegg L D L, Berry J A and Field C B. 2019. Terrestrial gross primary production: Using NIRV to scale from site to globe. Global Change Biology, 25(11): 3731-40. [DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14729http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14729.]

Bai J, Zhang H L, Sun R, Li X, Xiao J F and Wang Y. 2022. Estimation of global GPP from GOME-2 and OCO-2 SIF by considering the dynamic variations of GPP-SIF relationship. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 326: 15. [DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.109180http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.109180.]

Band L E, Patterson P, Nemani R and Running S W. 1993. FOREST ECOSYSTEM PROCESSES AT THE WATERSHED SCALE - INCORPORATING HILLSLOPE HYDROLOGY. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 63(1-2): 93-126. [DOI: 10.1016/0168-1923(93)90024-chttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(93)90024-c]

Bellasio R, Maffeis G, Scire J S, Longoni M G, Bianconi R and Quaranta N. 2005. Algorithms to account for topographic shading effects and surface temperature dependence on terrain elevation in diagnostic meteorological models. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 114(3): 595-614. [DOI: 10.1007/s10546-004-1670-6http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10546-004-1670-6]

Bi W J, He W, Zhou Y L, Ju W M, Liu Y B, Liu Y, Zhang X Y, Wei X N and Cheng N. 2022. A global 0.05 degrees dataset for gross primary production of sunlit and shaded vegetation canopies from 1992 to 2020. Scientific Data, 9(1). [DOI: 10.1038/s41597-022-01309-2http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01309-2]

Cao R Y, Chen Y, Shen M G, Chen J, Zhou J, Wang C and Yang W. 2018. A simple method to improve the quality of NDVI time-series data by integrating spatiotemporal information with the Savitzky-Golay filter. Remote Sensing of Environment, 217: 244-57. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2018.08.022http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.08.022]

Chen J M, Chen X and Ju W. 2013. Effects of vegetation heterogeneity and surface topography on spatial scaling of net primary productivity. Biogeosciences, 10(7): 4879-96. [DOI: 10.5194/bg-10-4879-2013http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-4879-2013]

Chen J M, Chen X Y, Ju W M and Geng X Y. 2005. Distributed hydrological model for mapping evapotranspiration using remote sensing inputs. Journal of Hydrology, 305(1-4): 15-39. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.08.029http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.08.029]

Chen J M, Ju W M, Ciais P, Viovy N, Liu R G, Liu Y and Lu X H. 2019. Vegetation structural change since 1981 significantly enhanced the terrestrial carbon sink. Nature Communications, 10. [DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-12257-8http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12257-8]

Chen J M, Liu J, Cihlar J and Goulden M L. 1999. Daily canopy photosynthesis model through temporal and spatial scaling for remote sensing applications. Ecological Modelling, 124 (2-3): 99-119. [DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3800(99)00156-8http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3800(99)00156-8]

Chen J M, Mo G, Pisek J, Liu J, Deng F, Ishizawa M and Chan D. 2012. Effects of foliage clumping on the estimation of global terrestrial gross primary productivity. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 26. [DOI: 10.1029/2010gb003996http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010gb003996]

Chen X F, Chen J M, An S Q and Ju W M. 2007. Effects of topography on simulated net primary productivity at landscape scale. Journal of Environmental Management, 85(3): 585-96. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jeiivmaii.2006.04.026http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeiivmaii.2006.04.026]

Chu H S, Luo X Z, Ouyang Z T, Chan W S, Dengel S, Biraud S C, Torn M S, Metzger S, Kumar J, Arain M A, Arkebauer T J, Baldocchi D, Bernacchi C, Billesbach D, Black T A, Blanken P D, Bohrer G, Bracho R, Brown S, Brunsell N A, Chen J Q, Chen X Y, Clark K, Desai A R, Duman T, Durden D, Fares S, Forbrich I, Gamon J A , Gough C M, Griffis T, Helbig M, Hollinger D, Humphreys E, Ikawa H, Iwata H Ju Y, Knowles J F, Knox S H, Kobayashi H, Kolb T, Law B, Lee X H, Litvak M, Liu H P, Munger J W, Noormets A, Novick K, Oberbauer S F, Oechel W, Oikawa P, Papuga S A, Pendall E, Prajapati P, Prueger J, Quinton W L, Richardson A D, Russell E S, Scott R L, Starr G, Staebler R, Stoy P C, Stuart-Haentjens E, Sonnentag O, Sullivan R C, Suyker A, Ueyama M, Vargas R, Wood J D and Zona D. 2021. Representativeness of Eddy-Covariance flux footprints for areas surrounding AmeriFlux sites. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 301: 15. [DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108350http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108350]

Deng F, Chen J M, Plummer S, Chen M Z and Pisek J. 2006. Algorithm for global leaf area index retrieval using satellite imagery. Ieee Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 44(8): 2219-29. [DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2006.872100http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2006.872100]

Dozier J and Frew J. 1990. RAPID CALCULATION OF TERRAIN PARAMETERS FOR RADIATION MODELING FROM DIGITAL ELEVATION DATA. Ieee Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 28(5): 963-9. [DOI: 10.1109/36.58986http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/36.58986]

Ershadi A, McCabe M F, Evans J P and Walker J P. 2013. Effects of spatial aggregation on the multi-scale estimation of evapotranspiration. Remote Sensing of Environment, 131: 51-62. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.12.007https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.12.007]

Farquhar G D, Caemmerer S V and Berry J A. 1980. A BIOCHEMICAL-MODEL OF PHOTOSYNTHETIC CO2 ASSIMILATION IN LEAVES OF C-3 SPECIES. Planta, 149(1): 78-90. [DOI: 10.1007/bf00386231http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00386231]

Fang H L. 2021. Scaling effects of the true and effective Leaf Area Index (LAI And LAIe) and Clumping Index (CI). Journal of Geo-information Science, 23(7): 1155-1168

方红亮. 2021. 真实和有效叶面积指数及聚集指数的尺度效应. 地球信息科学学报, 23(7): 1155-68 [DOI:10.12082/dqxxkx.2021.200609http://dx.doi.org/10.12082/dqxxkx.2021.200609]

Gond Valery, Fayolle A, Pennec A, Cornu G, Mayaux P, Camberlin P, Doumenge C, Fauvet N and Gourlet-Fleury S. 2013. Vegetation structure and greenness in Central Africa from Modis multi-temporal data. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 368(1625). [DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0309http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0309]

Gonsamo A, Chen J M, Price D T, Kurz W A, Liu J, Boisvenue C, Hember R A, Wu C Y and Chang K H. 2013. Improved assessment of gross and net primary productivity of Canada's landmass. Journal of Geophysical Research-Biogeosciences, 118(4): 1546-60. [DOI: 10.1002/2013JG002388http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2013JG002388]

Govind A, Chen J M, McDonnell J, Kumari J and Sonnentag O. 2011. Effects of lateral hydrological processes on photosynthesis and evapotranspiration in a boreal ecosystem. Ecohydrology, 4(3): 394-410. [DOI: 10.1002/eco.141http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eco.141]

Govind A, Chen J M, Margolis H, Ju W M, Sonnentag O and Giasson M. 2009. A spatially explicit hydro-ecological modeling framework (BEPS-TerrainLab V2.0): Model description and test in a boreal ecosystem in Eastern North America. Journal of Hydrology, 367(3-4): 200-16. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.01.006http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.01.006]

He L M, Chen J M, Gonsamo A, Luo X Z, Wang R, Liu Y and Liu R G. 2018. Changes in the Shadow: The Shifting Role of Shaded Leaves in Global Carbon and Water Cycles Under Climate Change. Geophysical Research Letters, 45(10): 5052-61. [DOI: 10.1029/2018gl077560http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2018gl077560]

He L M, Chen J M, Liu J N, Zheng T, Wang R, Joiner J, Chou S R, Cheng B, Liu Y, Liu R G and Rogers C. 2019. Diverse photosynthetic capacity of global ecosystems mapped by satellite chlorophyll fluorescence measurements. Remote Sensing of Environment, 232: 10. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111344http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111344]

Hengl T, de Jesus J M, Heuvelink G B M, Gonzalez M R, Kilibarda M, Blagotic A, Shangguan W, Wright M N, Geng X Y, Bauer-Marschallinger B, Guevara M A, Vargas R, MacMillan R A, Batjes N H, Leenaars J G B, Ribeiro E, Wheeler I, Mantel S and Kempen B. 2017. SoilGrids250m: Global gridded soil information based on machine learning. Plos One, 12(2). [DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169748http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169748]

Henry M, Picard N, Trotta C, Manlay R J, Valentini R, Bernoux M and Saint-Andre L. 2011. Estimating Tree Biomass of Sub-Saharan African Forests: a Review of Available Allometric Equations. Silva Fennica, 45(3): 477-569. [DOI: 14214/sf. 38http://dx.doi.org/14214/sf.38]

Huang P, Zhao W and Li A N. 2017. The Preliminary Investigation on the Uncertainties Associated With Surface Solar Radiation Estimation in Mountainous Areas. IEEE Geoscience & Remote Sensing Letters, 14(7): 1071-5. [DOI: 10.1109/LGRS.2017.2696973http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2017.2696973]

Huang W, Zhang L P, Furumi S, Muramatsu K, Daigo M and Li P X. 2010. Topographic effects on estimating net primary productivity of green coniferous forest in complex terrain using Landsat data: a case study of Yoshino Mountain, Japan. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 31(11): 2941-57. [DOI: 10.1080/01431160903140829http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431160903140829]

Huang X J, Zheng Y, Zhang H, Lin S R, Liang S L, Li X Q, Ma M G and Yuan W P. 2022. High spatial resolution vegetation gross primary production product: Algorithm and validation. Science of Remote Sensing, 100049. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srs.2022.100049https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srs.2022.100049]

Huntzinger D N, Schwalm C, Michalak A M, Schaefer K, King A W, Wei Y, Jacobson A, Liu S, Cook R B, Post W M, Berthier G, Hayes D, Huang M, Ito A, Lei H, Lu C, Mao J, Peng C H, Peng S, Poulter B, Riccuito D, Shi X, Tian H, Wang W, Zeng N, Zhao F and Zhu Q. 2013. The North American Carbon Program Multi-Scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project - Part 1: Overview and experimental design. Geoscientific Model Development, 6(6): 2121-33. [DOI: 10.5194/gmd-6-2121-2013http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-2121-2013]

Jarvis P G. 1976. INTERPRETATION OF VARIATIONS IN LEAF WATER POTENTIAL AND STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE FOUND IN CANOPIES IN FIELD. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 273(927): 593-610. [DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1976.0035http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1976.0035]

Julien Y, Sobrino J A and Verhoef W. 2006. Changes in land surface temperatures and NDVI values over Europe between 1982 and 1999. Remote Sensing of Environment, 103(1): 43-55. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2006.03.011http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.03.011]

Jung M. 2019. The FLUXCOM ensemble of global land-atmosphere energy fluxes. Scientific Data, 6(74). [DOI: 10.1038/s41597-019-0076-8http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0076-8]

Kana T M, Geider R J and Critchley C. 1997. Regulation of photosynthetic pigments in micro-algae by multiple environmental factors: a dynamic balance hypothesis. New Phytologist, 137(4): 629-38. [DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1997.00857.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.1997.00857.x]

Kapos V, Rhind J, Edwards M, Price M, Ravilious C and Butt N. 2000. Developing a map of the world's mountain forests. Forests in sustainable mountain development: a state of knowledge report for 2000. Task Force For. Sustain. Mt. Dev. :4-19.

Kljun N, Calanca P, Rotach M W and Schmid H P. 2015. A simple two-dimensional parameterisation for Flux Footprint Prediction (FFP). Geoscientific Model Development, 8(11): 3695-713. [DOI: 10.5194/gmd-8-3695-2015http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3695-2015]

Lasslop G, Reichstein M, Papale D, Richardson A D, Arneth A, Barr A, Stoy P and Wohlfahrt G. 2010. Separation of net ecosystem exchange into assimilation and respiration using a light response curve approach: critical issues and global evaluation. Global Change Biology, 16(1): 187-208. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02041.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02041.x]

Leishman M R and Westoby M. 1994. THE ROLE OF LARGE SEED SIZE IN SHADED CONDITIONS - EXPERIMENTAL-EVIDENCE. Functional Ecology, 8(2): 205-14. [DOI: 10.2307/2389903http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2389903]

Li A N, Bian J H, Yin G F, Jin H A, Zhao W, Zhang Z J, Nan X and Lei G B. 2018. Study on retrieving key ecological parameters in mountainous regions by remote sensing methods and evaluating their spatio-temporal representativeness. Advances in Earth Science, 33(2): 141-151

李爱农, 边金虎, 尹高飞, 靳华安, 赵伟, 张正健, 南希, 雷光斌. 2018. 山地典型生态参量遥感反演建模及其时空表征能力研究. 地球科学进展, 33(2): 141-51 [DOI: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2018.02.0141http://dx.doi.org/10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2018.02.0141]

Li A N, Bian J H, Zhang Z J, Zhao W and Yin G F. 2016a. Progresses, opportunities, and challenges of mountain remote sensing research. Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(5): 1199–1215

李爱农, 边金虎, 张正健, 赵伟, 尹高飞. 2016a. 山地遥感主要研究进展、发展机遇与挑战. 遥感学报, 20(5): 1199-1215 [DOI:10.11834/jrs.20166227http://dx.doi.org/10.11834/jrs.20166227]

Li A N, Yin G F, Jin H A, Bian J H and Zhao W. 2016b. Principles and Methods for the Retrieval of Biophysical Variables in Mountainous Areas. Remote Sensing Technology and Applications, 31(1): 1-11

李爱农, 尹高飞, 靳华安, 边金虎, 赵伟. 2016b. 山地地表生态参量遥感反演的理论、方法与问题. 遥感技术与应用, 31(1): 1-11 [DOI: 10.11873/j.issn.1004-0323.2016.1.0001http://dx.doi.org/10.11873/j.issn.1004-0323.2016.1.0001]

Li X W. 2015. Retrospect, Prospect and Innovation in Quantitative Remote Sensing. Journal of Henan University (Nature Science), 35(4): 49-56

李小文. 2005. 定量遥感的发展与创新. 河南大学学报(自然科学版), 35(4): 49-56 [DOI:10.15991/j.cnki.411100.2005.04.012http://dx.doi.org/10.15991/j.cnki.411100.2005.04.012]

Li X, Ma M G, Wang J, Liu Q, Che T, Hu Z Y, Xiao Q, Liu Q H, Su P X, Chu R Z, Jin R, Wang W Z and Ran Y H. 2008. Simultaneous Remote Sensing and Ground-based Experiment in the Heihe River Basin: Scientific Objectives and Experiment Design. ADVANCES IN EARTH SCIENCE, 23(9): 897-914

李新, 马明国, 王建, 刘强, 车涛, 胡泽勇, 肖青, 柳钦火, 苏培玺, 楚荣忠, 晋锐, 王维真, 冉有华. 2008. 黑河流域遥感—地面观测同步试验:科学目标与试验方案. 地球科学进展, 23(9): 897-914 [DOI: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2008.09.0897http://dx.doi.org/10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2008.09.0897]

Liang S L, Bai R, Chen X N, Cheng J, Fan W J, He T, Jia K, Jiang B, Jiang L M, Jiao Z T, Liu Y B, Ni W J, Qiu F, Song L L, Sun L, Tang B H, Wen J G, Wu G P, Xie D H, Yao Y J, Yuan W P, Zhang Y G, Zhang Y Z, Zhang Y T, Zhang X T, Zhao T J and Zhao X. 2020. Review of China’s land surface quantitative remote sensing development in 2019. Journal of Remote Sensing (Chinese), 24(6): 618-671

梁顺林, 白瑞, 陈晓娜, 程洁, 范闻捷, 何涛, 贾坤, 江波, 蒋玲梅, 焦子锑, 刘元波, 倪文俭, 邱凤, 宋柳霖, 孙林, 唐伯惠, 闻建光, 吴桂平, 谢东辉, 姚云军, 袁文平, 张永光, 张玉珍, 张云腾, 张晓通, 赵天杰, 赵祥. 2020. 2019年中国陆表定量遥感发展综述. 遥感学报, 24(6): 618-671 [DOI: 10.11834/jrs.20209476http://dx.doi.org/10.11834/jrs.20209476]

Liu L Y. 2014. Simulation and correction of spatialscaling effects for leaf area index. Journal of Remote Sensing, 18(6): 1158-68

刘良云. 2014. 叶面积指数遥感尺度效应与尺度纠正. 遥感学报, 18(6): 1158-68 [DOI: 10.11834/jrs.20144103http://dx.doi.org/10.11834/jrs.20144103]

Liu L Y and Song B W. 2022. Calculating the carbon sequestration rate of terrestrial ecosystems: methods, progress and challenges. Trans Atmos Sci, 45(3): 321-331

刘良云, 宋博文. 2022. 陆地生态系统固碳速率立体监测方法:进展与挑战. 大气科学学报, 45(3): 321-31 [DOI: 10.13878/j.cnki.dqkxxb.20220303002http://dx.doi.org/10.13878/j.cnki.dqkxxb.20220303002]

Liu Y, Zhou Y, Ju W, Wang S, Wu X, He M and Zhu G. 2014. Impacts of droughts on carbon sequestration by China's terrestrial ecosystems from 2000 to 2011. Biogeosciences, 11(10): 2583-99. [DOI: 10.5194/bg-11-2583-2014http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-2583-2014]

Liu Y B, Xiao J F, Ju W M, Zhu G L, Wu X C, Fan W L, Li D Q and Zhou Y L. 2018. Satellite-derived LAI products exhibit large discrepancies and can lead to substantial uncertainty in simulated carbon and water fluxes. Remote Sensing of Environment, 206: 174-88. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.12.024http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.12.024]

Mizoguchi Y, Miyata A, Ohtani Y, Hirata R and Yuta S. 2009. A review of tower flux observation sites in Asia. Journal of Forest Research, 14(1): 1-9. [DOI: 10.1007/s10310-008-0101-9http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10310-008-0101-9]

Novick K A, Biederman J A, Desai A R, Litvak M E, Moore D J P, Scott R L and Torn M S. 2018. The AmeriFlux network: A coalition of the willing. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 249: 444-56. [DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.10.009http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.10.009]

Perez-Ramos I M, Cambrolle J, Hidalgo-Galvez M D, Matias L, Montero-Ramirez A, Santolaya S and Godoy O. 2020. Phenological responses to climate change in communities of plants species with contrasting functional strategies. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 170. [DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2019.103852http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2019.103852]

Reichstein M, Falge E, Baldocchi D, Papale D, Aubinet M, Berbigier P, Bernhofer C, Buchmann N, Gilmanov T, Granier A, Grunwald T, Havrankova K, Ilvesniemi H, Janous D, Knohl A, Laurila T, Lohila A, Loustau D, Matteucci G, Meyers T, Miglietta F, Ourcival J M, Pumpanen J, Rambal S, Rotenberg E, Sanz M, Tenhunen J, Seufert G, Vaccari F, Vesala T, Yakir D and Valentini R. 2005. On the separation of net ecosystem exchange into assimilation and ecosystem respiration: review and improved algorithm. Global Change Biology, 11(9): 1424-39. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001002.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001002.x]

Robinson N P, Allred B W, Smith W K, Jones M O, Moreno A, Erickson T A, Naugle D E and Running S W. 2018. Terrestrial primary production for the conterminous United States derived from Landsat 30 m and MODIS 250 m. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation, 4(3): 264-80. [DOI: 10.1002/rse2.74http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rse2.74]

Running S, Mu Q and Zhao M. 2015. MOD17A2H MODIS/Terra Gross Primary Productivity 8-Day L4 Global 500m SIN Grid V006 [Data set]. NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD17A2H.006https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD17A2H.006]

Simic A, Chen J M, Liu J and Csillag F. 2004. Spatial scaling of net primary productivity using subpixel information. Remote Sensing of Environment, 93(1-2): 246-58. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2004.07.008http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2004.07.008]

Slevin D, Tett S F B, Exbrayat J F, Bloom A A and Williams M. 2017. Global evaluation of gross primary productivity in the JULES land surface model v3.4.1. Geoscientific Model Development, 10(7): 2651-70. [DOI: 10.5194/gmd-10-2651-2017http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2651-2017]

Sprintsin M, Chen J M, Desai A and Gough C M. 2012. Evaluation of leaf-to-canopy upscaling methodologies against carbon flux data in North America. Journal of Geophysical Research-Biogeosciences, 117. [DOI: 10.1029/2010jg001407http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010jg001407]

Stroppiana D, Antoninetti M and Brivio P A. 2014. Seasonality of MODIS LST over Southern Italy and correlation with land cover, topography and solar radiation. European Journal of Remote Sensing, 47: 133-52. [DOI: 10.5721/EuJRS20144709http://dx.doi.org/10.5721/EuJRS20144709]

Sun Q L, Feng X F, Yong G and Li B L. 2015. Topographical effects of climate data and their impacts on the estimation of net primary productivity in complex terrain: A case study in Wuling mountainous area, China. Ecological Informatics, 27: 44-54. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2015.02.003http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2015.02.003]

Tramontana G, Jung M, Schwalm C R, Ichii K, Camps-Valls G, Raduly B, Reichstein M, Arain M A, Cescatti A, Kiely G, Merbold L, Serrano-Ortiz P, Sickert S, Wolf S and Papale D. 2016. Predicting carbon dioxide and energy fluxes across global FLUXNET sites with regression algorithms. Biogeosciences, 13(14): 4291-313. [DOI: 10.5194/bg-13-4291-2016http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-4291-2016]

van Loon M P, Schieving F, Rietkerk M, Dekker S C, Sterck F and Anten N P R. 2014. How light competition between plants affects their response to climate change. New Phytologist, 203(4): 1253-65. [DOI: 10.1111/nph.12865http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.12865]

van Zyl J J. 2001. The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM): A breakthrough in remote sensing of topography. Acta Astronautica, 48(5-12): 559-65. [DOI: 10.1016/s0094-5765(01)00020-0http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0094-5765(01)00020-0]

Wigmosta M S, Vail L W and Lettenmaier D P. 1994. A DISTRIBUTED HYDROLOGY-VEGETATION MODEL FOR COMPLEX TERRAIN. Water Resources Research, 30(6): 1665-79. [DOI: 10.1029/94wr00436http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/94wr00436]

Xie X Y and Li A N. 2020a. An Adjusted Two-Leaf Light Use Efficiency Model for Improving GPP Simulations Over Mountainous Areas.Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 125(13): e2019JD031702. [DOI: 10.1029/2019jd031702http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2019jd031702]

Xie X Y and Li A N. 2020b. Development of a topographic-corrected temperature and greenness model (TG) for improving GPP estimation over mountainous areas. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 295: 108193. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108193https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108193]

Xie X Y, Li A N and Jin H A. 2018. The simulation models of the forest carbon cycle on a large scale: a review. ACTA ECOLOGICA SINICA, 38(1): 41-54

谢馨瑶, 李爱农, 靳华安. 2018. 大尺度森林碳循环过程模拟模型综述. 生态学报, 38(1): 41-54 [DOI: 10.5846/stxb201612122550http://dx.doi.org/10.5846/stxb201612122550]

Xie X Y, Li A N, Jin H A, Tan J B, Wang C B, Lei G B, Zhang Z J, Bian J H and Nan X. 2019. Assessment of five satellite-derived LAI datasets for GPP estimations through ecosystem models. Science of The Total Environment, 690: 1120-30. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.516https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.516]

Xie, X Y, Li A N, Tan J B, Jin H A, Nan X, Zhang Z J, Bian J H and Lei G B. 2020a. Assessments of gross primary productivity estimations with satellite data-driven models using eddy covariance observation sites over the northern hemisphere. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 280: 107771. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107771https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107771]

Xie X Y, Li A N, Tan J B, Lei G B, Jin H A and Zhang Z J. 2020b. Uncertainty analysis of multiple global GPP datasets in characterizing the lagged effect of drought on photosynthesis. Ecological Indicators, 113: 106224. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106224https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106224]

Xie X Y, Chen J M, Gong P and Li A N. 2021a. Spatial Scaling of Gross Primary Productivity Over Sixteen Mountainous Watersheds Using Vegetation Heterogeneity and Surface Topography. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 126(5): e2020JG005848. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG005848https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG005848]

Xie X Y, Li A N, Guan X B, Tan J B, Jin H A and Bian J H. 2021b. A practical topographic correction method for improving Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer gross primary productivity estimation over mountainous areas. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 103: 102522. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2021.102522https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2021.102522]

Xie X Y, Li A N, Jin H A, Bian J H, Zhang Z J and Nan X. 2021c. Comparing Three Remotely Sensed Approaches for Simulating Gross Primary Productivity over Mountainous Watersheds: A Case Study in the Wanglang National Nature Reserve, China. Remote Sensing, 13(18): 3567. [DOI: 10.3390/rs13183567http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs13183567]

Xie X Y, Li A N, Chen J M, Guan X B and Leng J Y. 2022a. Quantifying Scaling Effect on Gross Primary Productivity Estimation in the Upscaling Process of Surface Heterogeneity. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 127(7): e2021JG006775. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JG006775https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JG006775]

Xie X Y, Tian J, Wu C L, Li A N, Jin H A, Bian J H, Zhang Z J, Nan X and Jin Y. 2022b. Long-term topographic effect on remotely sensed vegetation index-based gross primary productivity (GPP) estimation at the watershed scale. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 108: 102755. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2022.102755https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2022.102755]

Xie X Y, Li A N, Tian J, Wu C L and Jin H A. 2023. A fine spatial resolution estimation scheme for large-scale gross primary productivity (GPP) in mountain ecosystems by integrating an eco-hydrological model with the combination of linear and non-linear downscaling processes. Journal of Hydrology, 616: 128833. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128833https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128833]

Yan G J, Wang T X, Jiao Z H, Mu X H, Zhao J and Chen L. 2016. Topographic radiation modeling and spatial scaling of clear-sky land surface longwave radiation over rugged terrain. Remote Sensing of Environment, 172: 15-27. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2015.10.026http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.10.026]

Yu G R, Fu Y L, Sun X M, Wen X F and Zhang L M. 2006. Research Progress and Development Ideas of China Terrestrial Ecosystem Flux Observation and Research Network (ChinaFLUX). Science in China Ser. D Earth Sciences, (S1): 1-21

于贵瑞, 伏玉玲, 孙晓敏, 温学发, 张雷明. 2006. 中国陆地生态系统通量观测研究网络(ChinaFLUX)的研究进展及其发展思路. 中国科学. D辑:地球科学, (S1): 1-21

Yuan W P, Cai W W, Liu D and Dong W J. 2014. Satellite-based Vegetation Production Models of Terrestrial Ecosystem: An Overview. ADVANCES IN EARTH SCIENCE, 29(5): 541-50

袁文平, 蔡文文, 刘丹, 董文杰. 2014. 陆地生态系统植被生产力遥感模型研究进展. 地球科学进展, 29(5): 541-50 [DOI: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2014.05.0541http://dx.doi.org/10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2014.05.0541]

Yuan W P, Lin S R and Wang X Y. 2022. Progress of studies on satellite-based terrestrial vegetation production models in China. Progress in Physical Geography-Earth and Environment, 46(6): 889-908. [DOI: 10.1177/03091333221114864http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03091333221114864]

Yuan W P, Liu S G, Yu G R, Bonnefond J M, Chen J Q, Davis K, Desai A R, Goldstein A H, Gianelle D, Rossi F, Suyker A E and Verma S B. 2010. Global estimates of evapotranspiration and gross primary production based on MODIS and global meteorology data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114(7): 1416-31. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2010.01.022http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.01.022]

Zhang S H, Li X G, She J F and Peng X M. 2019. Assimilating remote sensing data into GIS-based all sky solar radiation modeling for mountain terrain. Remote Sensing of Environment, 231: 15. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111239http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111239]

Zhang Y, Xiao X M, Wu X C, Zhou S, Zhang G L, Qin Y W and Dong J W. 2017. Data Descriptor: A global moderate resolution dataset of gross primary production of vegetation for 2000-2016. Scientific Data, 4. [DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.165http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.165]

Zhang Y Q, Kong D D, Gan R, Chiew F H S, McVicar T R, Zhang Q and Yang Y T. 2019. Coupled estimation of 500 m and 8-day resolution global evapotranspiration and gross primary production in 2002-2017. Remote Sensing of Environment, 222: 165-82. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2018.12.031http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.12.031]

Zhao W, Li A N, Zhang Z J, Bian J H, Jin H A, Yin G F, Nan X and Lei G B. 2016. A Study on Land Surface Temperature Terrain Effect over Mountainous Area based on Landsat 8 Thermal Infrared Data. REMOTE SENSING TECHNOLOGY AND APPLOCATION, 31(1): 63-73

赵伟, 李爱农, 张正健, 边金虎, 靳华安, 尹高飞, 南希, 雷光斌. 2016. 基于Landsat8热红外遥感数据的山地地表温度地形效应研究. 遥感技术与应用, 31(1): 63-73 [DOI: 10.11873/j.issn.1004-0323.2016.1.0063http://dx.doi.org/10.11873/j.issn.1004-0323.2016.1.0063]

Zhao W, Sanchez N, Lu H and Li A N. 2018. A spatial downscaling approach for the SMAP passive surface soil moisture product using random forest regression. Journal of Hydrology, 563: 1009-24. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.081http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.081]

Zhou Y, Zhu Q, Chen J M, Wang Y Q, Liu J, Sun R and Tang S. 2007. Observation and simulation of net primary productivity in Qilian Mountain, western China. Journal of Environmental Management, 85(3): 574-84. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.04.024http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.04.024]

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

暂无数据