浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
Published： 07 March 2020 ，
扫 描 看 全 文
代沁伶,罗斌,郑晨,王雷光.2020.区域多尺度马尔可夫随机场的遥感影像分类.遥感学报,24(3): 245-253
Dai Q L, Luo B, Zheng C and Wang L G. 2020. Regional multiscale Markov random field for remote sensing image classification. Journal of Remote Sensing（Chinese）， 24(3): 245-253
多尺度分析技术广泛应用于高分辨率遥感影像的特征提取和建模。分解层数受制于影像的大小，下采样小波变换实现的影像多尺度表达难以描述大范围的空间模式，导致分类结果出现“胡椒盐”现象；面向对象的影像分析技术虽避免了“胡椒盐”现象，但由于仅利用了单尺度的的特征，也难以描述影像多层次的空间模式，导致分类精度较低。为改善分类结果中的“胡椒盐”现象和提高分类精度，提出了一种结合区域多尺度遥感影像分割和马尔可夫随机场的分类方法。首先，获得原始影像过分割区域，依据区域内亮度均值以及区域间的共享边界长度信息，提取影像低频和高频特征，采用该低频特征波段代替原始影像，重复分割与特征波段提取过程，形成影像的区域多尺度表达。然后，以原始图像为初始尺度，以分割区域为处理单元，以更细尺度分类结果为标记场先验，以当前高频特征建立特征场，逐层分类、投影，获得最终尺度分类结果。合成纹理影像和多光谱遥感影像的实验表明：相比于小波域多尺度建模方法和单尺度区域建模方法，本文提出的方法可以有效提高分类精度，并避免“胡椒盐”现象的产生。
Multiscale analysis technique can describe an image from different resolutions and has been widely used for extracting features and modelling of remotely sensed images. The subsampled wavelet transforms are commonly employed for establishing the multiscale representation of an image. However
the wavelet-based features cannot describe patterns with long spatial spans and often result in noisy classification results. By contrast
the object-based image analysis can create classification maps composed of compact land objects. However
features extracted from a single scale still cannot provide discriminating information for the land cover classification. To improve the classification accuracy and alleviate noisy thematic maps
a regional multiscale classification method is proposed.The proposed method consists of two main blocks
including establishing a regional multiscale image representation and classifying on the basis of Markov Random Field (MRF). In the first block
the mean shift segmentation method is employed to create initial over-segmented regions. Thereafter
a rule combining the grey values in the regions and the shared boundary lengths among regions is designed to extract the low-frequency part of an image. The current high-frequency part is obtained by subtracting the original image and the current low-frequency portion. A regional multiscale representation can be iteratively established by replacing the original image with the low-frequency part and repeating the segmenting and decomposing process. In the second block
the classification result obtained from the original image is considered the prior of the label field in the first decomposed level
and the high-frequency part in the first level models the feature field of MRF. The classification result in the first level is obtained by solving an objective function consisting of feature and label energies. By iteratively projecting the current classification result to the next level and modelling the feature field with the high-frequency part
the final classification map can be acquired in the coarsest scale.To examine the effectiveness of the proposed method
three groups (six images in total)
such as Prague textures
synthetic remote sensing textures
and QuickBird multispectral images
are adopted. The proposed regional multiscale MRF (RMRF) is compared with the Iterated Conditional Model (ICM)
Graph Cut (GC)
and Wavelet-based MRF classification methods (WMRF). Visual inspection and quantitative measurement are employed for the comparison. As GC fails to integrate the spatial information among neighbouring pixels
the classification results are dominated by the pixel spectral values. Textures or land cover patterns with complex spectral heterogeneity cannot be properly captured. WMRF provides a pixel-level multiscale representation
which is also insufficient for describing texture patterns across a large spatial span. ICM
GC and WMRF may create noisy thematic maps with different extensions when the spectral heterogeneity of a given land cover pattern is extreme. On the contrary
RMRF has a flexible framework to extract and model spatial information. RMF can capture the essential features of land objects with large spectral heterogeneity
resulting in maps with less noise.This study proposes an RMRF for classification. Experiments demonstrate that the established multiscale representation can efficiently describe texture patterns with wide spatial spans
such as land objects with complex structures. By combining the multiscale representation with MRF model
RMRF can achieve a high-precision semantic segmentation of ground objects. The adaptive estimation of the decomposition layer number and parameters of the algorithm are the on-going works.
高分辨率遥感影像分类区域分割马尔可夫随机场多尺度模型
high resolution remote sensingimage classificationsregional segmentationMarkov random fieldmultiscale model
Benediktsson J A, Pesaresi M and Amason K. 2003. Classification and feature extraction for remote sensing images from urban areas based on morphological transformations. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41(9): 1940-1949 [DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2003.814625http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2003.814625]
Besag J. 1986. On the statistical analysis of dirty pictures. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 48(3): 259-279 [DOI: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1986.tb01412.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1986.tb01412.x]
Blaschke T. 2010. Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 65(1): 2-16 [DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.06.004http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.06.004]
Boykov Y, Veksler O and Zabih R. 2001. Fast approximate energy minimization via graph cuts. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 23(11): 1222-1239 [DOI: 10.1109/34.969114http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/34.969114]
Chang C C and Lin C J. 2011. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2(3): 27 [DOI: 10.1145/1961189.1961199http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1961189.1961199]
Cohen J. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1): 37-46 [DOI: 10.1177/001316446002000104http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104]
Comaniciu D and Meer P. 2002. Mean shift: a robust approach toward feature space analysis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 24(5): 603-619 [DOI: 10.1109/34.1000236http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/34.1000236]
Gislason P O, Benediktsson J A and Sveinsson J R. 2006. Random forests for land cover classification. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(4): 294-300 [DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2005.08.011http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2005.08.011]
Gong P, Li X and Xu B. 2006. Interpretation theory and application method development for information extraction from high resolution remotely sensed data. Journal of Remote Sensing, 10(1): 1-5
宫鹏, 黎夏, 徐冰. 2006. 高分辨率影像解译理论与应用方法中的一些研究问题. 遥感学报, 10(1): 1-5） [DOI: 10.11834/jrs.20060101http://dx.doi.org/10.11834/jrs.20060101]
Gong P. 2009. Some essential questions in remote sensing science and technology. Journal of Remote Sensing, 13(1): 1-23
宫鹏. 2009. 遥感科学与技术中的一些前沿问题. 遥感学报, 13(1): 1-23） [DOI: 10.11834/jrs.20090101http://dx.doi.org/10.11834/jrs.20090101]
Huang X, Zhang L P and Li P X. 2007. An adaptive multiscale information fusion approach for feature extraction and classification of IKONOS multispectral imagery over urban areas. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 4(4): 654-658 [DOI: 10.1109/LGRS.2007.905121http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2007.905121]
Li N, Huo H and Fang T. 2010. A novel texture-preceded segmentation algorithm for high-resolution imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 48(7): 2818-2828 [DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2010.2041462http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2010.2041462]
Li S Z. 2009. Markov Random Field Modeling in Image Analysis. 3rd ed. London: Springer-Verlag
Long J, Shelhamer E and Darrell T. 2015. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation//Proceedings of 2015 Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Boston, MA, USA: IEEE: 3431-3440 [DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298965http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298965]
Malfait M and Roose D. 1997. Wavelet-based image denoising using a Markov random field a priori model. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 6(4): 549-565 [DOI: 10.1109/83.563320http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/83.563320]
Marmanis D, Schindler K, Wegner J D, Galliani S, Datcu M and Stilla U. 2018. Classification with an edge: improving semantic image segmentation with boundary detection. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 135: 158-172 [DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.11.009http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.11.009]
Mikeš S, Haindl M, Scarpa G and Gaetano R. 2015. Benchmarking of remote sensing segmentation methods. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 8(5): 2240-2248 [DOI: 10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2416656http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2416656]
Moser G, Serpico S B and Benediktsson J A. 2013. Land-cover mapping by Markov modeling of spatial-contextual information in very-high-resolution remote sensing images. Proceedings of the IEEE, 101(3): 631-651 [DOI: 10.1109/JPROC.2012.2211551http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2012.2211551]
Noda H, Shirazi M N and Kawaguchi E. 2002. MRF-based texture segmentation using wavelet decomposed images. Pattern Recognition, 35(4): 771-782 [DOI: 10.1016/S0031-3203(01)00077-2http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0031-3203(01)00077-2]
Wang L G, Dai Q L, Xu Q Z and Zhang Y. 2015. Constructing hierarchical segmentation tree for feature extraction and land cover classification of high resolution MS imagery. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 8(5): 1946-1961 [DOI: 10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2428232http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2428232]
Wang L G, Cao X W, Zheng Y L and Dai Q L. 2018. Multi-scale feature extraction of hyperspectral image with guided filtering. Journal of Remote Sensing, 22(2): 293-303
王雷光, 曹小汪, 郑雅兰, 代沁伶. 2018. 高光谱影像的引导滤波多尺度特征提取. 遥感学报, 22(2): 293-303） [DOI: 10.11834/jrs.20186439http://dx.doi.org/10.11834/jrs.20186439]
Yu Q Y and Clausi D A. 2008. IRGS: Image segmentation using edge penalties and region growing. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 30(12): 2126-2139 [DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2008.15http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2008.15]
Zhang G and Ma Z M. 2010. An approach of using gabor wavelets for texture feature extraction. Journal of Image and Graphics, 15(2): 247-254
张刚, 马宗民. 2010. 一种采用Gabor小波的纹理特征提取方法. 中国图象图形学报, 15(2): 247-254） [DOI: 10.11834/JIG.20100210http://dx.doi.org/10.11834/JIG.20100210]
Zhang L and Ji Q. 2010. Image segmentation with a unified graphical model. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 32(8): 1406-1425 [DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2009.145http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2009.145]
Zheng C and Wang L G. 2015. Semantic segmentation of remote sensing imagery using object-based markov random field model with regional penalties. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 8(5): 1924-1935 [DOI: 10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2361756http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2361756]
Zheng C, Zhang Y and Wang L G. 2017. Semantic segmentation of remote sensing imagery using an object-based Markov random field model with auxiliary label fields. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 55(5): 3015-3028 [DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2017.2658731http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2017.2658731]
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621