浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
Published： 07 January 2021 ，
扫 描 看 全 文
刘银年.2021.高光谱成像遥感载荷技术的现状与发展.遥感学报，25（1）： 439-459
Liu Y N. 2021. Development of hyperspectral imaging remote sensing technology. National Remote Sensing Bulletin， 25（1）：439-459
高光谱成像技术可同时获取地物的几何、辐射和光谱信息，集相机、辐射计和光谱仪能力于一体，相比光学空间二维成像，可对地物进行空间和光谱三维成像，在一定的空间分辨率下，获取宽谱段范围内地物独特的连续特征光谱，对地物的精细分类和识别具有突出的优势，目前已成为对地遥感的重要前沿技术手段，在自然资源调查、生态环境监测、农林牧渔、海洋与海岸带监测等领域发挥着越来越重要的作用。随着高光谱遥感应用的深入研究，对高光谱成像遥感仪器的光谱范围、幅宽、光谱分辨率、空间分辨率、时间分辨率与定标精度等指标提出了新的要求。同时满足这些相互制约的参数指标，是国内外高光谱载荷研制中一直难以突破的技术难点。本文主要对国内外的高光谱成像遥感载荷技术进行了综述，介绍了国内外典型的机载、星载高光谱成像遥感仪器，以及近年来发射、正在研制和计划发展的星载高光谱成像载荷，并分析了这些载荷的技术方案、性能指标和应用效果；介绍了声光调谐（AOTF）、液晶调谐（LCTF）、法布里—珀罗调谐（FPTF），渐变式（LVF）和阶跃式（ISF）光楔滤光片，压缩感知光谱成像等新型分光技术，并分析了它们各自的技术优缺点以及应用于高光谱成像的可行性和现状；最后展望了高光谱成像载荷技术的发展趋势。
Hyperspectral remote sensing technology can acquire an object’s geometric
radiation
and spectral information. This technology is an important technique in Earth observations and is increasingly becoming important in applications of natural resource survey
environment and disaster monitoring
precision agriculture
oceans and costal monitoring
and urban planning. In the past decades
several advanced hyperspectral imaging systems from airborne (e.g.
AVIRIS
Hymap
OMIS
and PHI) to spaceborne (e.g.
EO-1/Hyperion and PROBA/CHRIS) platforms have been designed
built
and operated globally. On the one hand
airborne hyperspectral imager has been developed into commercial operation stage. Examples of international companies that develop airborne systems are Spectra Vista Corporation of America
Specim of Finland
and ITRES Research of Canada. On the other hand
GF-5/AHSI
which is a pioneer in Chinese spaceborne hyperspectral imager
has first realized wide spectrum
wide swath width
and high detection sensitivity. It marks a new era ever since the appearance of EO-1/Hyperion in 2000.
In the future
the outlook for hyperspectral remote sensing technique is as follows:
(1) The development of large-scale plane array detector
optical machining detection
and signal processing has improved not only the spectral resolution but also the spatial resolution and swath width of hyperspectral imaging. Hyperspectral imager’s spectrum range will cover from UV to LWIR to obtain more abundant spectral information of ground objects
all-day reflectance
and emission spectral characteristics. In addition
the integrated calibration methods of laboratory
in-orbit
and the Earth
the Sun
the Moon
the cold air
and the stars are becoming increasingly abundant and refined to ensure the application efficiency of hyperspectral imager at higher performance. The hyperspectral imaging technology with super wide width and higher resolution also puts forward higher requirements for the further development of large-scale detectors and large-aperture optics with wide working band range.
(2) The development of information
imaging
and optical processing technology has introduced new beam splitting technologies and developed the core beam splitting elements from the mature dispersion and interference type to the diversified direction. Many novel optical splitting schemes
such as Acousto-optic Tunable Filter (AOTF)
Liquid Crystal Tunable Filter (LCTF)
Linear Variable Filter (LVF)
Integrated Stepwise Filter (ISF)
Tunable Fabry-Perot Filter (TFPF) and computational spectral imaging system based on compressed sensing
are available at present. These spectroscopic image methods are still in the stage of laboratory experiments. An increasing attention has also been paid to the chip-level hyperspectral spectroscopy
which combines light splitting with photoelectric conversion.
(3) With the advances in the “artificial intelligence
” machine learning data process
such as neural network and deep learning
has become a trend with hyperspectral imaging to construct an ‘intelligent’ hyperspectral remote sensing satellite system. This technology will integrate the ability of automatic optimization of onboard load parameters and automatic real-time processing of onboard data and product generation. Meanwhile
the amount of remote sensing data obtained is explosively growing with the increase in resolution and information dimensions of hyperspectral imaging instruments. “Big data” feature is significant. Data transmission is an important issue in successfully using the effective data mining and information extraction and improving the efficiency of data compression in the future.
(4) The development of small UAV and micro-nano satellite technology has developed hyperspectral imaging toward a low-cost
flexible
integrated
and real-time technology. At present
the light and small hyperspectral imaging technology based on small UAV is greatly demanded and valuable in the fields of agricultural
forestry diseases and insect pests’ detection
target search
and rescue and relief. Micro-nano satellites have low cost and short development cycle and can conduct complex space remote sensing tasks. The combination of hyperspectral imaging and micro-nano satellite technologies will promote the integration of multi-functional structure and space exploration payload. Lightweight
integrated
and systematized hyperspectral remote sensing with space networking and all-time detection will play an important role in the future. It will provide the possibility for hyperspectral remote sensing satellites to enter the commercial field.
Many new principles
schemes
and technologies are being implemented and applied in hyperspectral imaging. The integrated acquisition and processing ability of multiple information is also greatly enhanced. The hyperspectral load is gradually developing in the direction of large field of view
large relative aperture
high resolution
and high quantification. The cost of hyperspectral remote sensing technology will be greatly reduced with its continuous development and maturity. The commercial application of this technology will also be an important direction of future development.
遥感高光谱成像遥感载荷技术宽谱宽幅高分辨率
remote sensinghyperspectral imagingremote sensing payloadwide spectrumwide swath widthhigh resolution
Accettura A G, Bruno C, Casotto S and Marzari F. 2004. Mission to mars using integrated propulsion concepts: considerations, opportunities, and strategies. Acta Astronautica, 54(7): 471-486 [DOI: 10.1016/S0094-5765(03)00208-Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0094-5765(03)00208-X]
Achal S, McFee J E, Ivanco T and Anger C. 2007. A thermal infrared hyperspectral imager (tasi) for buried landmine detection//Proceedings Volume 6553, Detection and Remediation Technologies for Mines and Minelike Targets XII. Orlando, Florida, United States: SPIE: 655316 [DOI: 10.1117/12.720453]
Asner G P and Heidebrecht K B. 2003. Imaging spectroscopy for desertification studies: comparing AVIRIS and EO-1 Hyperion in Argentina drylands. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41(6): 1283-1296 [DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2003.812903http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2003.812903]
August Y, Vachman C, Rivenson Y and Stern A. 2013. Compressive hyperspectral imaging by random separable projections in both the spatial and the spectral domains. Applied Optics, 52(10): D46-D54 [DOI: 10.1364/ao.52.000d46http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/ao.52.000d46]
Babey S K and Anger C D. 1993. Compact airborne spectrographic imager (CASI): a progress review//Proceedings Volume 1937, Imaging Spectrometry of the Terrestrial Environment. Orlando, FL, United States: SPIE: 152-163 [DOI: 10.1117/12.157052http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.157052]
Barnsley M J, Settle J J, Cutter M A, Lobb D R and Teston F. 2004. The PROBA/CHRIS mission: a low-cost smallsat for hyperspectral multiangle observations of the Earth surface and atmosphere. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42(7): 1512-1520 [DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2004.827260http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2004.827260]
Bessho K, Date K, Hayashi M, Ikeda A, Imai T, Inoue H, Kumagai Y, Miyakawa T, Murata H, Ohno T, Okuyama A, Oyama R, Sasaki Y, Shimazu Y, Shimoji K, Sumida Y, Suzuki M, Taniguchi H, Tsuchiyama H, Uesawa D, Yokota H and Yoshida R. 2016. An introduction to Himawari-8/9—Japan’s new-generation geostationary meteorological satellites. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, 94(2): 151-183 [DOI: 10.2151/jmsj.2016-009http://dx.doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2016-009]
Brady D J and Gehm M E. 2006. Compressive imaging spectrometers using coded apertures//Proceedings Volume 6246, Visual Information Processing XV. Orlando (Kissimmee), Florida, United States: SPIE: 62460A [
DOI 10.1117/12.667605]
Candes E J and Tao T. 2006. Near-optimal signal recovery from random projections: universal encoding strategies? IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 52(12): 5406-5425 [DOI: 10.1109/tit.2006.885507http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tit.2006.885507]
Chen R, Gao C, Wu X W, Zhou S Y, Hua J F and Ding L. 2019. Application of FY-4 atmospheric vertical sounder in weather forecast. Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 38(3): 285-289 [DOI: 10.11972/j.issn.1001-9014.2019.03.005http://dx.doi.org/10.11972/j.issn.1001-9014.2019.03.005]
Cheng Y B, Zarco-Tejada P J, Riaño D, Rueda C A and Ustin S L. 2006a. Estimating vegetation water content with hyperspectral data for different canopy scenarios: relationships between AVIRIS and MODIS indexes. Remote Sensing of Environment, 105(4): 354-366 [DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2006.07.005http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.07.005]
Cheng Y F, Gamon J A, Fuentes D A, Mao Z Y, Sims D A, Qiu H L, Claudio H, Huete A and Rahman A F. 2006b. A multi-scale analysis of dynamic optical signals in a Southern California chaparral ecosystem: a comparison of field, AVIRIS and MODIS data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 103(3): 369-378 [DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2005.06.013http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2005.06.013]
Chrien T G, Chovit C and Miller, P J. 1993. Imaging spectrometer using a liquid crystal tunable filter//Proceedings Volume 1937, Imaging Spectrometry of the Terrestrial Environment. Orlando, FL, United States: SPIE: 256-261 [DOI: 10.1117/12.157062http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.157062]
Cocks T, Jenssen R, Stewart A, Wilson I and Shields T. 1998. The HyMapTM airborne hyperspectral sensor: the system, calibration and performance//Presented at 1st EARSEL Workshop on Imaging Spectroscopy. Zurich: [s.n.]
Cong R, Wang Y K, Chen G, Cai Q Y, Zhou S, Jiang L, Liu D Q and Xu B Z. 2019. Methods for suppressing multi-order transmission peaks of tunable Fabry-Perot filter. Acta Optica Sinica, 39(3): 0323003
丛蕊, 王义坤, 陈刚, 蔡清元, 周晟, 蒋林, 刘定权, 徐宝帧. 2019. Fabry-Perot可调谐滤波器多级透射峰的抑制方法. 光学学报, 39(3): 0323003 [DOI: 10.3788/AOS201939.0323003http://dx.doi.org/10.3788/AOS201939.0323003]
Corson M R, Korwan D R, Lucke R L, Snyder W A and Davis C O. 2008. The hyperspectral imager for the coastal ocean (HICO) on the international space station//Proceedings of 2008 2008 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Boston, MA: IEEE: IV-101-IV-104 [DOI: 10.1109/IGARSS.2008.4779666http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2008.4779666]
Cui T W, Ma Y and Zhang J. 2003. The development and applications of the airborne hyperspectral remote sensing. Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 18(2): 118-122
崔廷伟, 马毅, 张杰. 2003. 航空高光谱遥感的发展与应用. 遥感技术与应用, 18(2): 118-122 [DOI: 10.11873/j.issn.1004-0323.2003.2.118http://dx.doi.org/10.11873/j.issn.1004-0323.2003.2.118]
Dong X F, Gan F P, Li N, Yan B K, Zhang L, Zhao J Q, Yu J C, Liu R Y and Ma Y N. 2020. Fine mineral identification of GF-5 hyperspectral image. Journal of Remote Sensing, 24(4): 454-464
董新丰, 甘甫平, 李娜, 闫柏琨, 张磊, 赵佳琪, 于峻川, 刘镕源, 马燕妮. 2020. 高分五号高光谱影像矿物精细识别. 遥感学报, 24(4): 454-464 [DOI: 10.11834/jrs.20209194http://dx.doi.org/10.11834/jrs.20209194]
Duarte M F, Davenport M A, Takhar D, Laska J N, Sun T, Kelly K F and Baraniuk R G. 2008. Single-pixel imaging via compressive sampling. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 25(2): 83-91 [DOI: 10.1364/cosi.2014.ctu2c.2http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/cosi.2014.ctu2c.2]
Fabry C and Perot A. 1897. Sur les franges des lames minces argentées et leur application à la mesure de petites épaisseurs d’air. Ann. Chim. Phys., 12: 459-501.
Fu A, Zhang H D, Zhang X Y, Sang H S, Zhang T Y and Xie C S. 2013. A tunable liquid crystal Fabry-Perot hyperspectral imaging device in mid-infrared wavelength range//Proceedings Volume 8917, MIPPR 2013: Multispectral Image Acquisition, Processing, and Analysis. Wuhan, China: SPIE: 891704 [DOI: 10.1117/12.2032159]
Gendrin A, Mangold N, Bibring J-P, Langevin Y, Gondet B, Poulet F, Bonello G, Quantin C, Mustard J, Arvidson R and LeMouélic S. 2005. Sulfates in Martian layered terrains: the OMEGA/mars express view. Science, 307(5715): 1587-1591 [DOI: 10.1126/science.1109087http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1109087]
Graff D L and Love S P. 2014. Adaptive hyperspectral imaging with a MEMS-based full-frame programmable spectral filter//Proceedings Volume 9101, Next-Generation Spectroscopic Technologies VII. Baltimore, Maryland, United States: SPIE: 910111 [DOI: 10.1117/12.2051436]
Green R O, Pieters C, Mouroulis P, Eastwood M, Boardman J, Glavich T, Isaacson P, Annadurai M, Besse S, Barr D, Buratti B, Cate D, Chatterjee A, Clark R, Cheek L, Combe J, Dhingra D, Essandoh V, Geier S, Goswami J N, Green R, Haemmerle V, Head J, Hovland L, Hyman S, Klima R, Koch T, Kramer G, Kumar A S K, Lee K, Lundeen S, Malaret E, McCord T, McLaughlin S, Mustard J, Nettles J, Petro N, Plourde K, Racho C, Rodriquez J, Runyon C, Sellar G, Smith C, Sobel H, Staid M, Sunshine J, Taylor L, Thaisen K, Tompkins S, Tseng H, Vane G, Varanasi P, White M and Wilson D. 2011. The Moon Mineralogy Mapper (M3) imaging spectrometer for lunar science: instrument description, calibration, on‐orbit measurements, science data calibration and on‐orbit validation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 116(E10): E00G19 [DOI: 10.1029/2011JE003797http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011JE003797]
Gupta N. 2003. Hyperspectral and Polarization Imaging Applications of Acousto-Optic Tunable Filters. Paris: WCU: 345-348.
Gupta N, Dahmani R, Gottlieb M S, Denes L J, Kaminsky B and Metes P. 1999. Hyperspectral imaging using acousto-optic tunable filters//Proceedings Volume 3718, Automatic Target Recognition IX. Orlando, FL, United States: SPIE [DOI: 10.1117/12.359988http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.359988]
Hofer S, Kaufmann H J, Stuffler t, Penné B, Schreier G, Müller A, Eckardt A, Bach H, Benz U C and Haydn R. 2007. EnMAP Hyperspectral Imager: an advanced optical payload for future applications in Earth observation programs//Proceedings Volume 6366, Remote Sensing for Environmental Monitoring, GIS Applications, and Geology VI. Stockholm, Sweden: SPIE: 115-120 [DOI: 10.1117/12.690608http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.690608]
Hörig B, Kühn F, Oschütz F and Lehmann F. 2001. Hymap hyperspectral remote sensing to detect hydrocarbons. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 22(8): 1413-1422 [DOI: 10.1080/01431160010013450http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431160010013450]
Hu B L, Sun D X and Liu Y N. 2018a. A novel method to remove fringes for dispersive hyperspectral VNIR imagers using back-illuminated CCDs. Remote Sensing, 10(1): 79 [DOI: 10.3390/rs10010079http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs10010079]
Hu B L, Zhang J, Cao K Q, Hao S J, Sun D X and Liu Y N. 2018b. Research on the etalon effect in dispersive hyperspectral VNIR imagers using back-illuminated CCDs. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 56(9): 5481-5494 [DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2018.2818258http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2018.2818258]
Itten K I, Dell’Endice F, Hueni A, Kneubühler M, Schläpfer D, Odermatt D, Seidel F, Huber S, Schopfer J, Kellenberger T, Bühler Y, D’Odorico P, Nieke J, Alberti E and Meuleman K. 2008. APEX - the hyperspectral ESA airborne prism experiment. Sensors, 8(10): 6235-6259 [DOI: 10.3390/s8106235http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s8106235]
Ji Y. 2006. Development of near space vehicle. International Aviation, (9): 84-85
季艳. 2006. 国外临近空间飞行器技术发展概述. 国际航空, (9): 84-85
Kittle D, Choi K, Wagadarikar A and Brady D J. 2010. Multiframe image estimation for coded aperture snapshot spectral imagers. Applied Optics, 49(36): 6824-6833 [DOI: 10.1364/ao.49.006824http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/ao.49.006824]
Korablev O, Bertaux J L, Fedorova A, Fonteyn D, Stepanov A, Kalinnikov Y, Kiselev A, Grigoriev A, Jegoulev V, Perrier S, Dimarellis E, Dubois J P, Reberac A, Van Ransbeeck E, Gondet B, Montmessin F and Rodin A. 2006. SPICAM IR acousto-optic spectrometer experiment on Mars Express. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 111(E9): E09S03 [DOI: 10.1029/2006JE002696http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JE002696]
Korablev O, Fedorova A, Bertaux J L, Stepanov A V, Kiselev A, Kalinnikov Y K, Titov A Y, Montmessin F, Dubois J P, Villard E, Sarago V, Belyaev D, Reberac A and Neefs E. 2012. SPICAV IR acousto-optic spectrometer experiment on Venus Express. Planetary and Space Science, 65(1): 38-57 [DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2012.01.002http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2012.01.002]
Krishna G, Sahoo R N, Pradhan S, Ahmad T and Sahoo P M. 2018. Hyperspectral satellite data analysis for pure pixels extraction and evaluation of advanced classifier algorithms for LULC classification. Earth Science Informatics, 11(2): 159-170 [DOI: 10.1007/s12145-017-0324-4http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12145-017-0324-4]
Krutz D, Venus H, Eckardt A, Walter I, Sebastian I, Reulke R, Günther B, Zender B, Arloth S, Williges C, Lieder M, Neidhardt M, Grote U, Schrandt F and Wojtkowiak A. 2018. DESIS - DLR earth sensing imaging spectrometer//Satoh S, eds. Image and Video Technology. Wuhan: Springer: 356-368 [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-92753-4_28http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92753-4_28]
Labate D, Ceccherini M, Cisbani A, De Cosmo V, Galeazzi C, Giunti L, Melozzi M, Pieraccini S and Stagi M. 2009. The PRISMA payload optomechanical design, a high performance instrument for a new hyperspectral mission. Acta Astronautica, 65(9/10): 1429-1436 [DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2009.03.077http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2009.03.077]
Li D Z. 2014. Radar Coincidence Imaging Technique Research. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology. (李东泽. 2014. 雷达关联成像技术研究. 长沙: 国防科学技术大学)
Li X Y, Fan H S, Pan S L, Jiang X H and Wu J Q. 2019. Zhuhai-1 Hyperspectral satellite data and applications. Satellite Application, (8): 12-18
李先怡, 范海生, 潘申林, 蒋晓华, 吴佳奇. 2019. 珠海一号高光谱卫星数据及应用概况. 卫星应用, (8): 12-18
Li Z Z, Yang R H, Dang F X, Du P J, Zhang X F, Tan B X, Zhao H J and Su H J. 2012. A review on the geological applications of hyperspectral remote sensing technology//Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS). Shanghai: IEEE: 1-4 [DOI: 10.1109/whispers.2012.6874235http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/whispers.2012.6874235]
Liu W J, Hu C Z, Jiang P P, Wu B and Shen Y H. 2015. Ultra-high-resolution spectrometry incorporating two-dimension dispersing spectrometer and tunable fabry-perot filter. Acta Optica Sinica, 35(6): 063007
柳文娟, 胡澄之, 姜培培, 吴波, 沈永行. 2015. 结合二维分光光谱仪与可调谐法布里—珀罗干涉仪的超高分辨率光谱测量技术研究. 光学学报, 35(6): 063007 [DOI: 10.3788/AOS201535.0630007http://dx.doi.org/10.3788/AOS201535.0630007]
Liu Y, Yuan X, Suo J L, Brady D J and Dai Q H. 2019a. Rank minimization for snapshot compressive imaging. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 41(12): 2990-3006 [DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2018.2873587http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2018.2873587]
Liu Y N, Ding X Z and Li Z Z. 2015. Specification design of hyperspectral imaging remote sensor used in geosciences. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences, 40(8): 1295-1300
刘银年, 丁学专, 李志忠. 2015. 面向地学应用的高光谱遥感器指标体系设计. 地球科学-中国地质大学学报, 40(8): 1295-1300 [DOI: 10.3799/dqkx.2015.109http://dx.doi.org/10.3799/dqkx.2015.109]
Liu Y N, Sun D X, Cao K Q, Liu S F, Chai M Y, Liang J and Yuan J. 2020a. Evaluation of GF-5 AHSI on-orbit instrument radiometric performance. Journal of Remote Sensing, 24(4): 352-359
刘银年, 孙德新, 曹开钦, 刘书锋, 柴孟阳, 梁建, 原娟. 2020a. 高分五号可见短波红外高光谱相机在轨辐射性能评估. 遥感学报, 24(4): 352-359 [DOI: 10.11834/jrs.20209258http://dx.doi.org/10.11834/jrs.20209258]
Liu Y N, Sun D X, Hu X N, Liu S F, Cao K Q, Chai M Y, Liao Q J, Zuo Z Q, Hao Z Y, Duan W B, Zhou W Y N, Zhang J and Zhang Y. 2020b. Development of visible and short-wave infrared hyperspectral imager onboard GF-5 satellite. Journal of Remote Sensing, 24(4): 333-344
刘银年, 孙德新, 胡晓宁, 刘书锋, 曹开钦, 柴孟阳, 廖清君, 左志强, 郝振贻, 段微波, 周魏乙诺, 张静, 张营. 2020b. 高分五号可见短波红外高光谱相机设计与研制. 遥感学报, 24(4): 333-344 [DOI: 10.11834/jrs.20209196http://dx.doi.org/10.11834/jrs.20209196]
Liu Y N, Sun D X, Hu X N, Liu S H, Gan F P and Ge S L. 2019. Observation capability and application prospect of the advanced hyperspectral imager. Areospace Shanghai, 36(S2): 99-105
刘银年, 孙德新, 胡晓宁, 刘思含, 甘甫平, 葛曙乐. 2019. 可见短波红外高光谱相机有效载荷观测能力及应用前景. 上海航天, 36(S2): 99-105 [DOI: 10.19328/j.cnki.1006-1630.2019.S.016http://dx.doi.org/10.19328/j.cnki.1006-1630.2019.S.016]
Liu Y N, Sun D X, Hu X N, Ye X, Li Y D, Liu S F, Cao K Q, Chai M Y, Zhou W Y N, Zhang J, Zhang Y, Sun W W and Jiao L L. 2019b. The advanced hyperspectral imager: aboard China's gaofen-5 satellite. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 7(4): 23-32 [DOI: 10.1109/MGRS.2019.2927687http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MGRS.2019.2927687]
Liu Y N, Xue Y Q, Wang J Y and Shen M M. 2002. Operational modular imaging spectrometer. Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 21(1): 9-13
刘银年, 薛永祺, 王建宇, 沈鸣明. 2002. 实用型模块化成像光谱仪. 红外与毫米波学报, 21(1): 9-13 [DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9014.2002.01.003http://dx.doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1001-9014.2002.01.003]
Loizzo R, Guarini R, Longo F, Scopa T, Formaro R, Facchinetti C and Varacalli G. 2018. Prisma: the Italian hyperspectral mission//Proceedings of 2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Valencia: IEEE: 175-178 [DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2009.03.077http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2009.03.077]
Love S P. 2009. Programmable matched filter and Hadamard transform hyperspectral imagers based on micromirror arrays. Proc//Proceedings Volume 7210, Emerging Digital Micromirror Device Based Systems and Applications. San Jose, California, United States: SPIE: 721007 [DOI: 10.1117/12.808060]
Love S P and Graff D L. 2014. Full-frame programmable spectral filters based on micromirror arrays. Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS, 13(1): 011108 [DOI: 10.1117/1.JMM.13.1.011108http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMM.13.1.011108]
Lu Y F, Cai Z J, Guo P L, Su Y F and Wu J H. 2018. An automatic cavity-length stabilizing and monitoring system for tunable Fabry-Perot filter//Proceedings Volume 10827, Sixth International Conference on Optical and Photonic Engineering (icOPEN 2018).
Shanghai, China: SPIE: 108270I [DOI: 10.1117/12.2501033http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2501033]
Lucey P G, Horton K A, Williams T J, Hinck K, Budney C, Rafert B and Rusk T B. 1993. SMIFTS: a cryogenically cooled, spatially modulated imaging infrared interferometer spectrometer//Proceedings Volume 1937, Imaging Spectrometry of the Terrestrial Environment. Orlando, FL, United States: SPIE: 129-141 [DOI: 10.1117/12.157050http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.157050]
Ma G X, Xue Y Q and Li G F. 2008. Satellite remote sensing for haze monitoring in Pearl River delta region. Science and Technology Review, 26(16): 72-76
马国欣, 薛永祺, 李高丰. 2008. 珠江三角洲地区的灰霾监控与卫星遥感. 科技导报, 26(16): 72-76 [DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7857.2008.16.016http://dx.doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-7857.2008.16.016]
Ma Y P, Zhang W and Liu D X. 2012. Characteristics of hyperspectral reconnaissance and threat to ground military targets. Aerospace Shanghai, 29(1): 37-40, 59
麻永平, 张炜, 刘东旭. 2012. 高光谱侦察技术特点及其对地面军事目标威胁分析. 上海航天, 29(1): 37-40, 59 [DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1630.2012.01.008http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-1630.2012.01.008]
Maestro M M, Paringit E C, Viray F A, Calvo J S, Ishida T, Takahashi Y, Kurihara J, Vergel K and Magallon B P. 2016. Determina on of the pre-launch image- processing techniques for Liquid Crystal Tunable Filter (LCTF) for PHL-Microsat DIWATA-1//Proceedings of the 37th Asian Conference on Remote Sensing. Colombo, Sri Lanka
Mahmoud K, Park S and Lee D H. 2018. Development of a new linearly variable edge filter (LVEF)-based compact slit-less mini-spectrometer. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 972: 012026 [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/972/1/012026http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/972/1/012026]
Makisara K, Meinander M, Rantasuo M, Okkonen J, Aikio M and Sipola K. 1993. Airborne imaging spectrometer for applications (AISA)//Proceedings of IGARSS '93-IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Tokyo: IEEE: 479-481 [DOI: 10.1109/IGARSS.1993.322291http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.1993.322291]
Mauser W. 2003. The airborne visible/infrared imaging spectrometer AVIS-2-multiangular und hyperspectral data for environmental analysis//Proceedings of 2003 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Toulouse: IEEE: 2020-2022 [DOI: 10.1109/IGARSS.2003.1294326http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2003.1294326]
Michael S. 2006. Fixed-wing unmanned aircraft are air force's best near-space option. Defense Daily, 229(30)
Michel S, Gamet P and Lefevre-Fonollosa M J. 2011. HYPXIM — A hyperspectral satellite defined for science, security and defence users//Proceedings of the 3rd Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS). Lisbon, Portugal: IEEE: 1-4 [DOI: 10.1109/whispers.2011.6080864http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/whispers.2011.6080864]
Murchie S, Arvidson R, Bedini P, Beisser K, Bibring J P, Bishop J, Boldt J, Cavender P, Choo T, Clancy R T, Darlington E H, Des Marais D, Espiritu R, Fort D, Green R, Guinness E, Hayes J, Hash C, Heffernan K, Hemmler J, Heyler G, Humm D, Hutcheson J, Izenberg N, Lee R, Lees J, Lohr D, Malaret E, Martin T, McGovern J A, McGuire P, Morris R, Mustard J, Pelkey S, Rhodes E, Robinson M, Roush T, Schaefer E, Seagrave G, Seelos F, Silverglate P, Slavney S, Smith M, Shyong W J, Strohbehn K, Taylor H, Thompson P, Tossman B, Wirzburger M and Wolff M. 2007. Compact reconnaissance imaging spectrometer for mars (CRISM) on mars reconnaissance orbiter (MRO). Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 112(E5): E05S03 [DOI: 10.1029/2006JE002682http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JE002682]
Natale V G, Kafri A, Tidhar G A, Chen M, Feingersh T, Sagi E, Cisbani A, Baroni M, Labate D, Nadler R, Leizer A, Signorile S, Tempesta P, Magliozzi M L, Catallo C and Pietropaolo A. 2013. SHALOM — Space-borne hyperspectral applicative land and ocean mission//Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS). Gainesville, FL: IEEE: 1-4 [DOI: 10.1109/WHISPERS.2013.8080667http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/WHISPERS.2013.8080667]
Nink S, Hill J, Buddenbaum H, Stoffels J, Sachtleber T and Langshausen J. 2015. Assessing the suitability of future multi- and hyperspectral satellite systems for mapping the spatial distribution of norway spruce timber volume. Remote Sensing, 7(9): 12009-12040 [DOI: 10.3390/rs70912009http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs70912009]
Peón J, Recondo C, Fernández S, Calleja F, De Miguel E and Carretero L. 2017. Prediction of topsoil organic carbon using airborne and satellite hyperspectral imagery. Remote Sensing, 9(12): 1211 [DOI: 10.3390/rs9121211http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs9121211]
Pearlman J S, Barry P S, Segal C C, Shepanski J, Beiso D and Carman S L. 2003. Hyperion, a space-based imaging spectrometer. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41(6): 1160-1173 [DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2003.815018http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2003.815018]
Qi W C, Zhang X, Wang N, Zhang M and Cen Y. 2019. A spectral-spatial cascaded 3d convolutional neural network with a convolutional long short-term memory network for hyperspectral image classification. Remote Sensing, 11(20): 2363 [DOI: 10.3390/rs11202363http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs11202363]
Sakamoto Y, Sugimura N, Fukuda K, Kuwahara T, Yoshida K, Kurihara J, Fukuhara T and Takahashi Y. 2016. Development and flight results of microsatellite bus system for RISING-2. Transactions of the Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 14(30): Pf_89-Pf_96 [DOI 10.2322/tastj.14.pf_89]
Sang B, Schubert J, Kaiser S, Mogulsky V, Neumann C, Förster K P, Hofer S, Stuffler T, Kaufmann H, Müller A, Eversberg T and Chlebek C. 2008. The EnMAP hyperspectral imaging spectrometer: instrument concept, calibration, and technologies//Proceedings Volume 7086, Imaging Spectrometry XIII. San Diego, California, United States: SPIE: 708605 [DOI: 10.1117.12.794870]
Schaepman M E, Jehle M, Hueni A, D'Odorico P, Damm A, Weyermann J, Schneider F D, Laurent V, Popp C, Seidel F C, Lenhard K, Gege P, Küchler C, Brazile J, Kohler P, De Vos L, Meuleman K, Meynart R, Schläpfer D, Kneubühler M and Itten K I. 2015. Advanced radiometry measurements and Earth science applications with the Airborne Prism Experiment (APEX). Remote Sensing of Environment, 158: 207-219 [DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2014.11.014http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.11.014]
Schmit T J, Griffith P, Gunshor M M, Daniels J M, Goodman S J and Lebair W J. 2017. A closer look at the ABI on the GOES-R series. Bulletin of the American Meterorological Society, 98(4): 681-698 [DOI: 10.1175/bams-d-15-00230.1http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-15-00230.1]
Seidel F C, Stavros E N, Cable M L, Green R and Freeman A. 2018. Imaging spectrometer emulates Landsat: a case study with Airborne Visible Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) and Operational Land Imager (OLI) data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 215: 157-169 [DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2018.05.030http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.05.030]
Shan Y H, Peng L and Sun Z H. 2006. Research of U. S. intellience, surveillance and reconnaissance systems. Journal of the National Defence University, (5): 91-92. (单月晖, 彭莉, 孙振华. 2006. 美军情报监视侦察系统发展研究. 国防大学学报(外军研究), (5): 91-92)
Shi Z D, Fang L and Zhou C X. 2014. Dispersive element based on grating and tunable Fabry-Perot filter in miniature spectrometer. Applied Optics, 53(1): 76-81 [DOI: 10.1364/AO.53.000076http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.53.000076]
Shingu H, Homma K, Kurosaki H, Suzuki T and Yamamoto H. 2003. Field observation of surface conditions using LCTF spectropolarimeter//Proceedings Volume 5017, Sensors and Camera Systems for Scientific, Industrial, and Digital Photography Applications IV. Santa Clara, CA, United States: SPIE [DOI: 10.1117/12.476782http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.476782]
Stuhlmann R, Rodriguez A, Tjemkes S, Aminou D M, Stark H and Schumann W. 2009. MTG-IRS: status, specifications and technical concept//Fourier Transform Spectroscopy 2009. Vancouver Canada: OSA [DOI: 10.1364/FTS.2009.FMC1http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/FTS.2009.FMC1]
Sun T and Kelly K 2009. Compressive sensing hyperspectral imager//Computational Optical Sensing and Imaging. San Jose, California United States: OSA [DOI: 10.1364/COSI.2009.CTuA5http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/COSI.2009.CTuA5]
Svedhem H, Titov D V, McCoy D, Lebreton J P, Barabash S, Bertaux J L, Drossart P, Formisano V, Häusler B, Korablev O, Markiewicz W J, Nevejans D, Pätzold M, Piccioni G, Zhang T L, Taylor F W, Lellouch E, Koschny D, Witasse O, Eggel H, warhaut M, Accomazzo A, Rodriguez-Canabal J, Fabrega J, Schirmann T, Clochet A and Coradini M. 2007. Venus express—the first European mission to Venus. Planetary and Space Science, 55(12): 1636-1652 [DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2007.01.013http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2007.01.013]
Tanii J, Iwasaki A, Kawashima T and Inada H. 2012. Results of evaluation model of Hyperspectral Imager Suite (HISUI)//Proceedings of 2012 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Munich: IEEE: 131-134 [DOI: 10.1109/IGARSS.2012.6351619http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2012.6351619]
Tanii J, Kashimura O, Ito Y and Iwasaki A. 2016. Flight model performances of HISUI hyperspectral sensor onboard ISS (International Space Station)//Proceedings Volume 10000, Sensors, Systems, and Next-Generation Satellites XX. Edinburgh, United Kingdom: SPIE: 100000A [DOI: 10.1117/12.2243846http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2243846]
Tao C N, Zhu H Z, Sun P, Wu R M and Zheng Z R. 2020. Hyperspectral image recovery based on fusion of coded aperture snapshot spectral imaging and RGB images by guided filtering. Optics Communications, 458: 124804 [DOI: 10.1016/j.optcom.2019.124804http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2019.124804]
Tong Q X, Xue Y Q and Zhang L F. 2014. Progress in hyperspectral remote sensing science and technology in China over the past three decades. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 7(1): 70-90 [DOI: 10.1109/JSTARS.2013.2267204http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2013.2267204]
Tong Q X, Zhang B and Zhang L F. 2016. Current progress of hyperspectral remote sensing in China. Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(5): 689-707
童庆禧, 张兵, 张立福. 2016. 中国高光谱遥感的前沿进展. 遥感学报, 20(5): 689-707 [DOI: 10.11834/JRS.20166264http://dx.doi.org/10.11834/JRS.20166264]
Transon J, D’Andrimont R, Maugnard A and Defourny P. 2018. Survey of hyperspectral earth observation applications from space in the sentinel-2 context. Remote Sensing, 10(2): 157 [DOI: 10.3390/rs10020157http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs10020157]
Tripathi M K and Govil H. 2019. Evaluation of AVIRIS-NG hyperspectral images for mineral identification and mapping. Heliyon, 5(11): e02391 [DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02931http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02931]
van Wagtendonk J W, Root R R and Key C H. 2004. Comparison of AVIRIS and Landsat ETM+ detection capabilities for burn severity. Remote Sensing of Environment, 92(3): 397-408 [DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2003.12.015http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2003.12.015]
Vane G. 1987. First results from the airborne visible/infrared imaging spectrometer (AVIRIS)//Proceedings Volume 0834, Imaging Spectroscopy II. San Diego, CA, United States: SPIE: 127-143 [DOI: 10.1117/12.942296http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.942296].
Vane G, Goetz A F H and Wellman J B. 1984. Airborne imaging spectrometer: a new tool for remote sensing. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, GE-22(6): 546-549 [DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.1984.6499168http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.1984.6499168]
Veraverbeke S, Stavros E N and Hook S J. 2014. Assessing fire severity using imaging spectroscopy data from the Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) and comparison with multispectral capabilities. Remote Sensing of Environment, 154: 153-163 [DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2014.08.019http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.08.019]
Wagadarikar A, John R, Willett R and Brady D. 2008. Single disperser design for coded aperture snapshot spectral imaging. Applied Optics, 47(10): B44-B51 [DOI: 10.1364/ao.47.000b44http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/ao.47.000b44]
Wan L M, Lin Y Y, Zhang H S, Wang F, Liu M F and Lin H. 2020. GF-5 hyperspectral data for species mapping of mangrove in Mai Po, Hong Kong. Remote Sensing, 12(4): 656 [DOI: 10.3390/rs12040656http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs12040656]
Wang J, Zhou W and Yao L B. 2012. Review of current techniques and trends on foreign imaging reconnaissance. Journal of Naval Aeronautical and Astronautical University, 27(2): 199-204
王捷, 周伟, 姚力波. 2012. 国外成像侦察技术现状及发展趋势. 海军航空工程学院学报, 27(2): 199-204 [DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1522.2012.02.019http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-1522.2012.02.019]
Wang J Y and Xue Y Q. 1992. 64-Band airborne imaging spectrometer. Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 11(3): 181-188
王建宇, 薛永祺. 1992. 64波段机载成象光谱仪. 红外与毫米波学报, 11(3): 181-188
Wang J Y and Xue Y Q. 1998. Airborne imaging spectrometers developed in China//Proceedings Volume 3502, Hyperspectral Remote Sensing and Application. Beijing, China: SPIE [DOI: 10.1117/12.317776http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.317776]
Wang Y. 2015. Study of spectral imaging system based on filter. Changchun:
Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences 王颖. 2015. 滤光片型光谱成像技术研究. 长春: 中国科学院研究生院(长春光学精密机械与物理研究所))
Wang Y M, Jia J X, He Z P and Wang J Y. 2016. Key technologies of advanced hyperspectral imaging system. Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(5): 850-857
王跃明, 贾建鑫, 何志平, 王建宇. 2016. 若干高光谱成像新技术及其应用研究. 遥感学报, 20(5): 850-857 [DOI: 10.11834/jrs.20166206http://dx.doi.org/10.11834/jrs.20166206]
Wei L Q, Xiao X Z, Wang Y M, Zhuang X Q and Wang J Y. 2017. Research on the shortwave infrared hyperspectral imaging technology based on Integrated Stepwise filter. Infrared Physics and Technology, 86: 90-97 [DOI: 10.1016/j.infrared.2017.08.023http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infrared.2017.08.023]
Williams F L. 2003. The spectral characterization of the Cross-track Infrared Sounder (CrIS) engineering model: updated methodology and initial test results//Proceedings Volume 5152, Infrared Spaceborne Remote Sensing XI. San Diego, California, United States: SPIE [DOI: 10.1117/12.508543http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.508543]
Xiao X Z. 2015. Research of Stepwise Integrated Filter Based Infrared Spectral Imaging. Shanghai:
Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences 肖喜中. 2015. 基于阶跃集成滤光片分光的红外光谱成像技术研究. 上海: 中国科学院研究生院(中国科学院上海技术物理研究所))
Xu Y, Xie S B, Liang J, Sun D X, Qi N M and Liu Y N. 2020. A novel method to remove interference fringes for hyperspectral SWIR imagers. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 58(11): 7580-7588. [DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2020.2981640http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2020.2981640]
Yan C X. 2013. TG-1 hyperspectral imager. China Science and Technology Achievements, (11): 82-83 (颜昌翔. 2013. 天宫一号高光谱成像仪. 中国科技成果, (11): 82-83) [DOI: 10.3772/j.issn.1009-5659.2013.11.033]
Yarbrough S, Caudill T R, Kouba E T, Osweiler V, Arnold J, Quarles R, Russell J, Otten III L J, Jones B A, Edwards A, Lane J, Meigs A D, Lockwood R B and Armstrong P. 2002. MightySat II.1 hyperspectral imager: summary of on-orbit performance//Proceedings Volume 4480, Imaging Spectrometry VII. San Diego, CA, United States: SPIE: 186-197 [DOI: 10.21236/ada430883http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada430883]
Yuan J W, Wu C, Du B, Zhang L P and Wang S G. 2020. Analysis of landscape pattern on urban land use based on GF-5 hyperspectral data. Journal of Remote Sensing, 24(4): 465-478
袁静文, 武辰, 杜博, 张良培, 王树根. 2020. 高分五号高光谱遥感影像的城市土地利用景观格局分析. 遥感学报, 24(4): 465-478 [DOI: 10.11834/jrs.20209252http://dx.doi.org/10.11834/jrs.20209252]
Yuan X K. 2004. Present and future status of space microwave imaging radar. Space Electronic Technology, (1): 1-6, 14
袁孝康. 2004. 空间微波成像雷达的发展现状与未来. 空间电子技术, (1): 1-6, 14
Zhang Y. 2016. Optical Technology of Long-wave Infrared Hyperspectral Imaging. Shanghai:
Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences 张营. 2016. 长波红外高光谱成像仪光学技术研究. 上海: 中国科学院研究生院(中国科学院上海技术物理研究所)
Zhao X, Xiao Z Q, Kang Q, Li Q and Fang L. 2010. Overview of the Fourier transform hyperspectral imager (HSI) boarded on HJ-1A satellite//Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Honolulu, HI: IEEE: 4272-4274 [DOI: 10.1109/IGARSS.2010.5649250http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2010.5649250]
Zheng Q B and Wei J. 2004. Medium Resolution Imaging Spectro-radiometer (MRIS) on SZ-3 Spacecraft. Hangzhou: Chinese Society of Optics, Zhejiang Optical Society, Zhejiang University. (郑亲波, 危峻. 2004. SZ-3中分辨率成像光谱仪//大珩先生九十华诞文集暨中国光学学会2004年学术大会论文集. 杭州: 中国光学学会, 浙江省光学会, 浙江大学)
Zhu W, Wang X, Huang Y, Du P J and Tan K. 2020. Reweighted sparsity regularized deep nonnegative matrix factorization with total variation toward hyperspectral unmixing. Journal of Remote Sensing, 24(4): 401-416
祝伟, 王雪, 黄岩, 杜培军, 谭琨. 2020. 重加权稀疏和全变差约束下的深度非负矩阵分解高光谱解混. 遥感学报, 24(4): 401-416 [DOI: 10.11834/jrs.20209193http://dx.doi.org/10.11834/jrs.20209193]
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621