浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
Published： 07 March 2023 ，
扫 描 看 全 文
李丽，辛晓洲，唐勇，柏军华，杜永明，孙林，闻建光，仲波，吴善龙，张海龙，余珊珊，柳钦火.2023.辐射传输模型模拟与深度学习结合的高分一号卫星植被光合有效辐射吸收比例产品反演算法.遥感学报，27（3）： 700-710
Li L，Xin X Z，Tang Y，Bai J H，Du Y M，Sun L，Wen J G，Zhong B，Wu S L，Zhang H L，Yu S S and Liu Q H. 2023. Fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation inversion algorithm of GF-1 data combining radiative transfer model simulation and deep learning. National Remote Sensing Bulletin， 27（3）：700-710
植被光合有效辐射吸收比例FPAR（Fraction of absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation）是碳循环光能利用率模型中的关键参数之一。高分系列卫星的发射，为反演定量遥感产品提供了高时空分辨率的卫星遥感数据，基于高分数据的植被光合有效辐射吸收比例产品能够为生态系统碳循环的分析评估提供更加精细、精度更高的输入参数产品。本文发展了一种基于深度学习的光合有效辐射吸收比例反演方法。该方法利用SAIL（Scattering by Arbitrarily Inclined Leaves）模型模拟多种太阳入射角度、观测角度、大气条件下的植被冠层光合有效辐射吸收比例及冠层反射率，形成海量输入—输出模拟数据集，具有鲁棒性及更好的普适性；基于深度信念网络对数据集进行训练，得到高分一号（GF-1）卫星光合有效辐射吸收比例遥感反演模型。利用中国科学院怀来遥感综合试验站及黑河流域地表过程综合观测网FPAR地面站点连续观测数据对玉米作物、芦苇草地等下垫面反演的FPAR进行了对比验证，RMSE分别为0.15和0.17。本方法以辐射传输模型模拟的多维大气及地表输入—植被冠层输出作为深度学习的训练样本库，弥补了训练样本数量不足及观测数据不全带来的深度学习训练过程中的误差，从而使得模型兼具机理性和高效性。同时，反演的输入为具有太阳角度、观测角度信息的地表反射率产品，降低了输入参数获取的难度，减少输入参数误差传递的影响，有利于实现产品的业务化生产。
The Fraction of absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FPAR) is one of the key parameters in the light use efficiency model of the carbon cycle. High-spatiotemporal-resolution data have been provided for the inversion of quantitative remote sensing products since the launch of GF satellites. The FPAR products derived from GF satellite data provide precise and accurate input parameters for the analysis and evaluation of the ecosystem’s carbon cycle. In this study
a deep learning algorithm was developed to retrieve FPAR over China based on the simulated data of the radiative transfer model. The inputs are surface reflectance
cloud detection
and land cover products of GF-1 satellite data
whereas the output is FPAR. The FPAR product has a spatial resolution of 16 m and a temporal resolution of 10 days. This method uses the SAIL model to simulate output canopy FPAR and reflectance under various input variables
such as solar and observing angles and atmospheric conditions. The FPAR inversion model of GF-1 satellite data was obtained using a deep belief network. The long-term crop and grassland FPAR observation data in Huailai and Heihe were used to compare and validate the FPAR products
with a root mean square error of 0.15 and 0.17
respectively. The inversed FPAR is in good agreement with the measured FPAR in the low values
but lower than the measured FPAR in the high values. The radiative transfer model
the representativeness of the simulated data
and the preprocessing (calibration and geometric and atmospheric correction) of the GF-1 satellite data inevitably introduce some biases in the inversion process. This method uses the multidimensional atmospheric and surface variables as the input and the simulated vegetation canopy by the radiative transfer model parameters as the output. The simulated dataset
used as the training samples for deep learning
makes up for the errors in the deep learning training process caused by the insufficient number of training samples and incomplete observation data. The input of the inversion is only the surface reflectance product with the information of the sun angle and the observation angle. It lessens the difficulty of obtaining input parameters
reduces the influence of the error transmission of the input parameters
and is conducive to the realization of the commercial production of the product. The high FPAR is mainly distributed in the northeast
north
central
east
southwest
and south parts of China. The interannual variation of the FPAR time series
combined with the vegetation growing cycle and phenology
is high in spring and summer and low in autumn and winter.
定量遥感反演GF-1卫星光合有效辐射吸收比例SAIL模型深度学习
quantitative remote sensing inversionGF-1FPARSAIL modeldeep learning
Baret F, Hagolle O, Geiger B, Bicheron P, Miras B, Huc M, Berthelot B, Niño F, Weiss M, Samain O, Roujean J L and Leroy M. 2007. LAI, fAPAR and fCover CYCLOPES global products derived from VEGETATION: Part 1: principles of the algorithm. Remote Sensing of Environment, 110(3): 275-286 [DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2007.02.018http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2007.02.018]
Chen J M. 1996. Canopy architecture and remote sensing of the fraction of photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by boreal conifer forests. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 34(6): 1353-1368 [DOI: 10.1109/36.544559http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/36.544559]
Chen L F, Gao Y H, Li L, Liu Q H and Gu X F. 2008. Forest NPP estimation based on MODIS data under cloudless condition. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 51(3): 331-338 [DOI: 10.1007/s11430-008-0013-8http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11430-008-0013-8]
Dawson T P, North P R J, Plummer S E and Curran P J. 2003. Forest ecosystem chlorophyll content: implications for remotely sensed estimates of net primary productivity. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24(3): 611-617 [DOI: 10.1080/01431160304984http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431160304984]
Fan W J, Liu Y, Xu X R, Chen G X and Zhang B T. 2014. A new FAPAR analytical model based on the law of energy conservation: a case study in China. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 7(9): 3945-3955 [DOI: 10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2325673http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2325673]
Gobron N, Pinty B, Mélin F, Taberner M, Verstraete M M, Robustelli M and Widlowski J L. 2007. Evaluation of the MERIS/ENVISAT FAPAR product. Advances in Space Research, 39(1): 105-115 [DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2006.02.048http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2006.02.048]
Goward S N and Huemmrich K F. 1992. Vegetation canopy PAR absorptance and the normalized difference vegetation index: an assessment using the SAIL model. Remote Sensing of Environment, 39(2): 119-140 [DOI: 10.1016/0034-4257(92)90131-3http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(92)90131-3]
Huete A R, Liu H Q, Batchily K and van Leeuwen W. 1997. A comparison of vegetation indices over a global set of TM images for EOS-MODIS. Remote Sensing of Environment, 59(3): 440-451 [DOI: 10.1016/S0034-4257(96)00112-5http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(96)00112-5]
Knyazikhin Y, Martonchik J V, Myneni R B, Diner D J and Running S W. 1998. Synergistic algorithm for estimating vegetation canopy leaf area index and fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation from MODIS and MISR data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 103(D24): 32257-32275 [DOI: 10.1029/98JD02462http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/98JD02462]
Li L, Du Y M, Tang Y, Xin X Z, Zhang H L, Wen J G and Liu Q H. 2015a. A new algorithm of the FPAR product in the Heihe river basin considering the contributions of direct and diffuse solar radiation separately. Remote Sensing, 7(5): 6414-6432 [DOI: 10.3390/rs70506414http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs70506414]
Li L, Fan W J, Du Y M, Tang Y, Xin X Z, Zhang H L and Liu Q H. 2015b. A characteristic study of crop canopy direct and diffuse fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation based on SAIL model simulation. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 51(1): 99-108
李丽, 范闻捷, 杜永明, 唐勇, 辛晓洲, 张海龙, 柳钦火. 2015. 基于SAIL模型模拟的农作物冠层直射与散射光合有效辐射吸收比例特性研究. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 51(1): 99-108 [DOI: 10.13209/j.0479-8023.2014.145http://dx.doi.org/10.13209/j.0479-8023.2014.145]
Li W J and Fang H L. 2015. Estimation of direct, diffuse, and total FPARs from Landsat surface reflectance data and ground-based estimates over six FLUXNET sites. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 120(1): 96-112 [DOI: 10.1002/2014JG002754http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014JG002754]
Li W J, Fang H L, Wei S S, Weiss M and Baret F. 2021. Critical analysis of methods to estimate the fraction of absorbed or intercepted photosynthetically active radiation from ground measurements: application to rice crops. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 297: 108273 [DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108273http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108273]
Liu L Y, Zhang X, Xie S, Liu X J, Song B W, Chen S Y and Peng D L. 2019. Global white-sky and black-sky FAPAR retrieval using the energy balance residual method: algorithm and validation. Remote Sensing, 11(9): 1004 [DOI: 10.3390/rs11091004http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs11091004]
Liu Q H，Wen J G，Zhou X，Zhao J，Li Z Y，Li X，Ma M G，Wang W Z，Liao X H，Liu S M，Fan W J，Xiao Q，ZhongB，Li J，Xin X Z，Li L，Jia L，Gao Z H，Jin J D，Liang S，Xin J，Liao C J and Wu Y R. 2023. Technique system ofremote sensing product generation and validation of GF common products. National Remote Sensing Bulletin， 27(3)：544-562
柳钦火，闻建光，周翔，赵坚，李增元，李新，马明国，王维真，廖小罕，刘绍民，范闻捷，肖青，仲波，李静，辛晓洲，李丽，贾立，高志海，金家栋，梁师，邢进，廖楚江，吴一戎.2023.高分遥感共性产品生成和真实性检验技术体系.遥感学报，27(3)：544-562 [DOI：10.11834/jrs.20235022http://dx.doi.org/10.11834/jrs.20235022]
Liu S M, Li X, Xu Z W, Che T, Xiao Q, Ma M G, Liu Q H, Jin R, Guo J W, Wang L X, Wang W Z, Qi Y, Li H Y, Xu T R, Ran Y H, Hu X L, Shi S J, Zhu Z L, Tan J L, Zhang Y and Ren Z G. 2018. The Heihe integrated observatory network: a basin-scale land surface processes observatory in China. Vadose Zone Journal, 17(1): 180072 [DOI: 10.2136/vzj2018.04.0072http://dx.doi.org/10.2136/vzj2018.04.0072]
Liu S M, Xu Z W, Wang W Z, Jia Z Z, Zhu M J, Bai J and Wang J M. 2011. A comparison of eddy-covariance and large aperture scintillometer measurements with respect to the energy balance closure problem. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15(4): 1291-1306 [DOI: 10.5194/hess-15-1291-2011http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1291-2011]
Lu C L, Wang R and Yin H. 2014. GF-1 satellite remote sensing characters. Spacecraft Recovery and Remote Sensing, 35(4): 67-73
陆春玲, 王瑞, 尹欢. 2014. “高分一号”卫星遥感成像特性. 航天返回与遥感, 35(4): 67-73 [DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-8518.2014.04.009http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-8518.2014.04.009]
Myneni R B, Hoffman S, Knyazikhin Y, Privette J L, Glassy J, Tian Y, Wang Y, Song X, Zhang Y, Smith G R, Lotsch A, Friedl M, Morisette J T, Votava P, Nemani R R and Running S W. 2002. Global products of vegetation leaf area and fraction absorbed PAR from year one of MODIS data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83(1/2): 214-231 [DOI: 10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00074-3http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00074-3]
Pinty B, Lavergne T, Widlowski J L, Gobron N and Verstraete M M.2009. On the need to observe vegetation canopies in the near-infrared to estimate visible light absorption. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113(1): 10-23 [DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2008.08.017http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.08.017]
Rahman M M, Lamb D W and Stanley J N. 2015. The impact of solar illumination angle when using active optical sensing of NDVI to infer FAPAR in a pasture canopy. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 202: 39-43 [DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.12.001http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.12.001]
Roujean J L and Breon F M. 1995. Estimating PAR absorbed by vegetation from bidirectional reflectance measurements. Remote Sensing of Environment, 51(3): 375-384 [DOI: 10.1016/0034-4257(94)00114-3http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(94)00114-3]
Sellers P J. 1985. Canopy reflectance, photosynthesis and transpiration. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 6(8): 1335-1372 [DOI: 10.1080/01431168508948283http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431168508948283]
Sellers P J, Tucker C J, Collatz G J, Los S O, Justice C O, Dazlich D A and Randall D A. 1994. A global 1°×1° NDVI data set for climate studies. Part 2: the generation of global fields of terrestrial biophysical parameters from the NDVI. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 15(17): 3519-3545 [DOI: 10.1080/01431169408954343http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431169408954343]
Steven M D, Malthus T J, Baret F, Xu H and Chopping M J. 2003. Intercalibration of vegetation indices from different sensor systems. Remote Sensing of Environment, 88(4): 412-422 [DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2003.08.010http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2003.08.010]
Tao X, Liang S L and He T. 2013. Estimation of fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation from multiple satellite data//Proceedings of 2013 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Melbourne: IEEE: 3072-3075 [DOI: 10.1109/IGARSS.2013.6723475http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2013.6723475]
Tian D F, Fan W J and Ren H Z. 2020. Progress of fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation retrieval from remote sensing data. Journal of Remote Sensing, 24(11): 1307-1324
田定方, 范闻捷, 任华忠. 2020. 植被光合有效辐射吸收比率遥感研究进展. 遥感学报, 24(11): 1307-1324 [DOI: 10.11834/jrs.20208498http://dx.doi.org/10.11834/jrs.20208498]
Tian Y, Dickinson R E, Zhou L, Zeng X, Dai Y, Myneni R B, Knyazikhin Y, Zhang X, Friedl M, Yu H, Wu W and Shaikh M. 2004. Comparison of seasonal and spatial variations of leaf area index and fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Common Land Model. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 109(D1): D01103 [DOI: 10.1029/2003JD003777http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003777]
Verhoef W. 1984. Light scattering by leaf layers with application to canopy reflectance modeling: the SAIL model. Remote Sensing of Environment, 16(2): 125-141 [DOI: 10.1016/0034-4257(84)90057-9http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(84)90057-9]
Xiao Z Q, Liang S L, Sun R, Wang J D and Jiang B. 2015. Estimating the fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation from the MODIS data based GLASS leaf area index product. Remote Sensing of Environment, 171: 105-117 [DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2015.10.016http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.10.016]
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621